It just makes no sense to me that, given the political, cultural, and economic differences between SoCal (defined roughly as everything south of the Tehachapi Mountains) and the rest of the state, that the state of California should exist in its current form. What do y'all think? We wouldn't have to change the flag if we put two sparsely populated and culturally identical states like the Dakotas together, either. (Inspired by a post on the "Annoying Trends" thread.) P.S.: mods, is this considered political? Shunt it off to the Lobby if you think it is.