Haven't used pedals other than tuner & muff before and I could use the benefit of some collective TB experience. I'm just gonna list the pedals I'm assembling onto a board powered by a One Spot, and you tell me the order in which they belong: Boss tuner - obviously 1st Big Muff Deluxe Diamond Bass Comp Jr. Donner Octaver MXR M81 preamp Broughton HPF (on it's way from Canada) Are there different sequences for different purposes, or is it a hard & fast order? I've searched (cursorily) and found conflicting answers. I expect to get a few conflicting answers here but at least they'll be from guys who have real-world experience doing what I do. Thanks! I'll post pics when I get it sorted out.
OK, I'm already dizzy from the array of responses in that thread. Everyone does it differently! I'm gonna have to experiment and come up with my own answers. I guess I was just being lazy.
Starting to look like there's a lot less rhyme or reason to it. For every bassist who has a reason for doing it one way, theres another dude saying the opposite. Tuner first, that's all I know. We spend so much $ on these things, I'm starting to think I was better off going cowboy as it were. Total joykiller. Anybody wanna buy some stupid pedals?
Naw, I think you have a fun project on your hands. The joy is in the experimenting. I suggest tuner, hpf, to start. Get those working and sounding good. Then experiment by adding and testing the others one at a time starting with the pre, octaver, muff. Test them separately after the HPF to determine what sounds good to you. Then combinations. Based on your testing you'll figure out what works for you. What I do remember is that the octaver tracks better when it is placed after the HPF. What I also remember is that some add an additional HPF/LPF last to clean up after the effect pedals. Also, Placing the pre at the end may allow you to utilize it"s eq to smooth things out as well. Let us know how it goes.
Sigh. That project is not something a guy like me looks forward to. I honestly thought there was a cut and dried method that everyone adhered to. I know I'm in the minority around here but I'm not a luthier/electrician/engineer. I'm frankly not that educated. I'm a pretty damn good bass player - been playing in bands since 1983. That's what I did instead of getting a HS diploma. I'm the idiot savant who can drive the car, but don't ask me to rebuild the carburetor.
Messing with this order for now. Can't really test at full volume because neighbors. I miss the studio more today than usual. I'll try the octaver after the HPF next.
Messing with this order for now. Can't really test at full volume because neighbors. I miss the studio more today than usual. I'll try the octaver after the HPF next...
My vote would be: Tuner-> HPF -> Comp -> Octave -> Muff -> Preamp. Octaves respond better to a cleaner signal, so having the HPF and then Comp before it not only keeps the Octave from trying to manipulate sub-lows (because of the HPF), but the HPF keeps the comp from compressing those same inaudible sub-lows, so now the signal going from the comp to the octave has a nice, even signal from string to string going into it. Also, it looks like you have the Muff before the Octave. My octave is analog (not sure about yours), and therefore putting dirt/fuzz before is problematic for me. YMMV. Thank you for coming to my TB talk