MIM Player Plus PJ 1.6665Cool, have you got any Standard/MIM USA basses you could measure for us?
Ind. CV70s Natural 1.6245
MIM Player J 1.6735
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
MIM Player Plus PJ 1.6665Cool, have you got any Standard/MIM USA basses you could measure for us?
The difference between thinnest and thickest is like a G-string width. <heh> So yeah, not much.Thank you SharpCat! I wish I could find my calipers so I could add/compare. My guess is that even the same basses are going to vary to some degree by year, manufacturer and by country of origin.
For one, the CV 70s natural (vintage tinted) are described as soft maple. Grain on the body I have is definitely maple of some sort.
As far as I know just the natural finishes.
View attachment 5286590
Picked this one up from Fender's Black Friday sale. I don't know if it was priced so low exclusively for play members, but the discount on this was too good to ignore. The color and the gold anodized guard really grabbed me, but what I love most is the neck. As a long time jazz bass exclusive player, I've never gotten along with traditional p-bass necks. This bass has a hybrid shape between a P and a J that just fits my hand so nicely. I've done some research on these after the fact and it looks like I lucked out with the wood grain showing through the finish, and the neck tint is more golden than orangey. Also, very surprised at how good the stock pickup sounds, and how "noiseless" the bass is. I feel like I really got a steal here, other than the fact that the headstock says Squier. But you know what? This bass is so fricken cool, I'm almost proud it is a Squier!
Invalid Link Removed
View attachment 5272340
Well, having just bought a loaded new limited edition affinity PJ body from another TBer, that puts me at 2 Squier bodies, but both have Fender necks, so I can't comment on the necks. Both bodies are excellent. (Both Indonesian, BTW.) First body is a CV 70s natural Jazz in maple, and while joins between wood pieces are visible, overall the body is completely fine. Routing quality in the cavities good. The new body is a 3TS with beautiful figuring in poplar, and the joins are not visible from the top. Under the covers, the routing is rough. I think the router bit needed changing. Many burrs and even a few nearly loose chunks of wood. Shielding paint was slopped on haphazardly.Can someone please tell me what this bass lacks compared to an American Fender Precision of any year or model? This super inexpensive, but super sexy Squier just absolutely blows me away. The tone and playability are exactly what I would want in a p bass, all the hardware seems to be of good quality, unless it turns out I'm really just not picky about those things. But I'm from the "Squiers are junk for beginners…American (or Japanese) Fenders only please" generation. But this Squier has really made me rethink my life, lol. I realize I'm asking the Squier club this, and maybe I should just post a new thread asking this, but I know it has been done to death. Yet here I am.
View attachment 5291140
Can someone please tell me what this bass lacks compared to an American Fender Precision of any year or model? This super inexpensive, but super sexy Squier just absolutely blows me away. The tone and playability are exactly what I would want in a p bass, all the hardware seems to be of good quality, unless it turns out I'm really just not picky about those things. But I'm from the "Squiers are junk for beginners…American (or Japanese) Fenders only please" generation. But this Squier has really made me rethink my life, lol. I realize I'm asking the Squier club this, and maybe I should just post a new thread asking this, but I know it has been done to death. Yet here I am.
View attachment 5291140
If I think I understand what you mean, if this bass had a Fender logo on it I guess I wouldn't be having this conversation, right? It is silly that the Squier logo would bother me, and honestly it really doesn't especially with this bass. I went to my local shop last night and played some US made p basses, and nothing about them made me want to give up this Squier! It makes me smile knowing I only paid $250 for this bass directly from Fender.com. This is one of those special "everything comes together" basses, for me. I just don't get some of the comments about the lack of quality in the hardware or electronics. The tuners "seem" fine to me, but I guess time will tell. The volume and tone knobs turn smoothly with a nice feel to them. The bridge is a standard bent bridge with threaded saddles, nothing crazy here. The paint finish is well applied and smooth. The wood grain shows through just enough to be interesting. It looks like it is a two piece body, which is pretty standard on even very expensive basses. Yes, the neck has a gloss finish, but that really has never bothered me over the years. Other than the fact that I had to just take the sharp edges off the ends of the frets with a few minutes of file work, this bass would have been perfect right out of the box.Easily spot on are lacking Fender decal on headstock. Hahaha......
Congratulations! It's nice when that happens.If I think I understand what you mean, if this bass had a Fender logo on it I guess I wouldn't be having this conversation, right? It is silly that the Squier logo would bother me, and honestly it really doesn't especially with this bass. I went to my local shop last night and played some US made p basses, and nothing about them made me want to give up this Squier! It makes me smile knowing I only paid $250 for this bass directly from Fender.com. This is one of those special "everything comes together" basses, for me. I just don't get some of the comments about the lack of quality in the hardware or electronics. The tuners "seem" fine to me, but I guess time will tell. The volume and tone knobs turn smoothly with a nice feel to them. The bridge is a standard bent bridge with threaded saddles, nothing crazy here. The paint finish is well applied and smooth. The wood grain shows through just enough to be interesting. It looks like it is a two piece body, which is pretty standard on even very expensive basses. Yes, the neck has a gloss finish, but that really has never bothered me over the years. Other than the fact that I had to just take the sharp edges off the ends of the frets with a few minutes of file work, this bass would have been perfect right out of the box.
For reference on how much I'm enjoying this bass, I recently got a EBMM Stingray Special which is amazing and I've written about that in the Stingray Special club thread, but this Squier just calls to me!
I have several Squiers and have only gotten one bass where a single tuner needed replacement "out of the box"… the rest work perfectly fine and have…I just don't get some of the comments about the lack of quality in the hardware or electronics. The tuners "seem" fine to me, but I guess time will tell. The volume and tone knobs turn smoothly with a nice feel to them. The bridge is a standard bent bridge with threaded saddles, nothing crazy here. The paint finish is well applied and smooth.
I have read several times (if I understood correctly) that you have a perfect alignment of strings and pickup poles on CV60s P bass. It is not the case for me on my chinese 2012 CV60P , the 20mm strings spacing at bridge is too wide, I think that with a vintage not high mass bridge it would be better centered.
Is it possible that my pickup is not stock if yours are centered ?
Or are yours no centered ?
Thanks
edit : it works well as is I am just curious
I'll do one better at home if needed but I have this one in stock, slightly tilted but you can see the "non-centering" ?