So a friend and I are interested in starting a duo group. We would both sing while I play bass and acoustic guitar (not at the same time obviously) and he would play acoustic guitar and electric guitar all depending on the songs and arrangements. We're also considering some drum machine stuff, but I don't think it will be necessary. This group will be primarily for building repertoire, playing out, having fun, and maybe making a few bucks. Now for some questions that maybe some of you can answer.. How much can we expect to be paid for just a duo gig? We should have a decently full sound with both of us playing and singing, but we're not gonna be as fun as a 6 piece party band. We'll probably be playing gigs in our small hometown and around the Toledo and Columbus metropolitan areas. How would some of you think I should shape my tone to make the bass sound good with just an acoustic or electric? I know I can do this myself after messing around, but advice never hurts. And if anyone has additional advice or stories on this type of gig don't hesitate to share!
i joined a group like that when someone i knew was offered a contract from a coffee shop chain. it didnt pay alot but was farily okay i would say for some two guys starting off as a semi-pro musicians. since those were coffee shop gigs; 30W combo for bass, 15 combo for guitar and a 100W combo for vocals were seriously more than enough but that would depend on the size of the venue and how loud you want to be right? regarding the tone, as they say, use your ear and eq is your friend we always made sure our sets were fun, we used to take requests for songs rather even ask if any one wanted a special song and we never went too loud as we were playing a coffee shop and not a rock gig in a bar
I don't think you need to settle for less money (at least on a per-player basis) than a full size band. In fact, you might be able to settle for more. But perhaps instead of thinking about competing directly with larger bands, you could turn your format into an advantage. The advantage is that you are not carrying all the baggage of a full size band. My genre is jazz, so I often get called to play duo with a guitarist or pianist. In the jazz scene, solo or duo acts often work their way into smaller venues where the owner can't afford, or doesn't want the volume level, of a full band. Of course those gigs might pay lower, but you might still come out ahead on a per-player basis. And, if you can manage to downsize your gear -- especially to the point of cramming everything into a small car -- then you might not mind taking some gigs that would not even make sense for a bigger band. With a quick load-in, you can take weekday night gigs without cutting into anybody's day job. I suggest that you should get your tunes down on paper, in a format that a competent side-man can follow. Of course there are players who specialize in this kind of work. Even a so called "jazz" player will often take gigs in any genre. This gives you the option of expanding the band with a bassist and drummer when the venue and pay scale justify it.
If you have strong vocals and a good repertoire, this is a nice format for gigs where low volume is a plus. Around a decent market, you should be able to pull at least $250 per man for corporates, wedding rehearsal dinners, graduation and college reunion events, etc.
Would it sound better to just stick with bass and acoustic guitar? Originally we discussed some songs where he would play electric guitar and some songs where I would play acoustic and different combinations. Songs with two acoustics etc. but I think although this would be cool it would be unnecessary. What do you guys think? I'm also mainly a jazz player. This is for expanding my playing cause when I get out of college I don't really expect to make a living on jazz much less completely on music even though I guess that's the goal. I'm now doing jazz stuff, in a classic rock band, and then we're gonna try and do this and hopefully I can get some steady gigs.
I suggest just trying it both ways, and see how it plays in Peoria. I suspect that acoustic plus bass will give a reasonably full sound. And of course, bass is what really makes it happen. Versatility will certainly benefit you. I play with a guitarist who does it all -- rock, acoustic, jazz, etc. Also, for casuals, clients will often favor a band that can start out with some nice light dinner music, then morph into dance music later on, often with the addition of players who show up just for the dance portion. This avoids them having to deal with multiple entertainment providers. Also, perish the thought that you eventually end up with a day job, but being able to play genres that don't require a 2-hour load in, or touring, might help you balance multiple income sources later on. Versatility also gets you around the typical problem that rock bands face, which is that they quickly saturate their own local markets.