Hey Jerrold, good to see you on here! Farace, I'd bet that you fixed it. If it noises up again, I'd bet a second cleaning would fix it for good. Pretty excellent detective work!
Still no noise; the loudest sound in the room was the refrigerator, even with the volume cranked, and no noise from tapping components. I buttoned her up and called her good to go. Thanks to everyone for all the help, and again, apologies for this being in a biasing thread (but I really thought at first it was going to be that).
I had the fuzz distortion on my 2003 svt3 pro, got rid of it now just fine tuning to 25mV. Now it seems one MOSFET is considerably higher than the others. At this stage im currently at: Back 3.1 5.5 18.5 3.2 2.3 6.5 1.7 10.0 is this difference too high (18mV to 10)?
Double-check the resistance of all of the resistors that you are measuring the voltage across. One or two may have shifted up in value giving a false reading.
Something as simple as cleaning connectors as part of a regular maintenance program can go a long way. Good to hear that it worked out.
Can someone put me in the right thread. Been trying to find one for my svt 4 pro. When I power the amp up I get static noise even with the mute button pushed in with nothing plugged in to the amp. Driving me crazy!!
On my SVT-6 Pro, exact same setup, I did actually adjust the lower bias pot. I went too far, admittedly, and I got a nice puff of smoke from the heatsink. After opening up the heatsink and taking the upper circuit board off, I realized there was an additional blue pot, that looks identical to the first bias pot. So now I'm confused as to which pot should have been adjusted. I'll be able to test and repair the circuit board. It doesn't actually look like anything got significantly cooked. I'll simply have to test each component. I'm thinking now that I should have adjusted the upper blue pot to change the bias. So when I adjusted the lower pot, it increased the wrong circuit flow causing the overheat. Is that correct?
You know, this may sound crazy, but if it were my amp and I was bound and determined to work on it myself, I would at least find out what the trimpot I'm about to adjust does before I adjust it. This is a textbook example of costing yourself more money by trying to save money.
True, but let's focus on the solution, not the problem. If I had the money, I'd take it to someone, but I don't. There's no other option.
Herein lies the problem... it's virtually IMPOSSIBLE to focus on a solution if you can't correctly identify the problem. This is "troubleshooting 101" in a nutshell. I agree with Jimmy 100% on this one.
The SVT-6PRO is complicated. Unfortunately, you'll need test equipment to service this amp. It operates in bridged mode only but the two halves can be un-linked for servicing and testing. There are two bias pots AP1 for channel 1 [+]half, and AP2 for channel 1 [-] half. The pots should be labeled so you can see which one you turned. There are ten IFRP-240R power transistors in each half. A lot to check out.
Bridge mode amps require even more involved test procedures, and sometimes there are offset and symmetry controls depending on the specific circuit topology used. On these kinds of amps, often even qualified experienced techs will refer back to the paperwork to avoid accidental destruction.
I can totally relate to saving money, but you will spend more money trying to fix it yourself than taking it to a tech. You already smoked it once, and that may not even be the problem.
This is exactly the information I needed AND it collaborates with my findings. I've done my checking. The 5 MOSFETs on the Blue Dot AP1 side were fried and the causation of the smoke. All other components are working. It's a $20 fix. So after replacing these, it's obvious that AP1 will adjust The 5 Blue Dot IFRP's. AP2 I'm sure will then adjust the Red Dot side. Essentially these are the two identical SVT-3 amps, which once bridged, make the SVT-6. So for further diagnostics, which resistors and I'm checking to identify the individual bias amount? Would it be the The pairs of green ceramic resistors on each side? There are paper resistors running between the MOSFETS, which is what I originally tested. I think that was my problem. The current traveling from these bridged resistors was giving me the AVERAGE current between both sides. So the 21mV rating, while seeming tolerable, could easily reflect that one side might be working optimally at 25mV, but the other side might have been running at 16 or 17mV, hypothetically. Who knows, but I'll have to wait for the MOSFET's to come in before I can know more. Can someone please confirm my hypothesis that these paper resistors running between the two sides are simply used for bridging and would therefore reflect an average current AND that testing the pairs of green ceramic resistors on each side will give me the reading of the two bias adjustments independently?
Here are some related products that TB members are talking about. Clicking on a product will take you to TB’s partner, Primary, where you can find links to TB discussions about these products. Browser not compatible