• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join free Log in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Switching from Markbass 8x10 to Ampeg 8x10

#21
I'm thinking this one was from 2014? So would be better than the 05 year?
1000001420.jpg
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20240624_200204_Messenger.jpg
    Screenshot_20240624_200204_Messenger.jpg
    1 MB · Views: 8
  • Like
Reactions: bobyoung53, rodl2005 and DJ Bebop
#22
SocksWthSandals said:
Wanting to pull the trigger on an ampeg 8x10 (2005 I think) cabinet. I feel like the Markbass just is a bit too bright on the mids and highs and just sounds maybe a bit too muffled on the low ends. Is that a smart move? I know gone is something subjective but I have always liked the ampeg tones.

(Bonus picture of Oliver for your enjoyment)
Click to expand...

Fantastic choice! :thumbsup:
 
  • Like
Reactions: SocksWthSandals
#23
I have tested only Markbass 104HF that is more or less the half of the 108, but I get your point. While Ampeg is heavy in low mids feeling like thunder, Markbass sounds more even with clarity. The lack of clarity sometimes bother me with Ampeg and I cannot get rid of the signature sound in any way. Markbass is funny cab cutting through in the mix no matter what you do or how you adjust it. It sounds open, clear and detailed while Ampeg is like rock thunder.

Try Markbass with HPF set to 50Hz and then boost your bass and low mid tone controls to get more lows. This keeps low-lows under control and gives you more thump.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fishheadjoe, DJ Bebop, SocksWthSandals and 1 other person
#25
Personally I can't stand the tone of Ampeg 810s (or any other sealed Ampeg cabs I've tested). Poor lows. Muddy low mids. Nasal and "hollow" sounding in the higher mids. Not my thing at all. Of course this is just MY opinion, but you asked for it.;)

I've never tested a Markbass 8x10 but based on the voicing of every other Markbass cab I've played I'm pretty sure I would prefer it over the Ampeg 810. But I would prefer almost ANYHING over the Ampeg 810.:vomit:

But Markbass isn't my favorite either. Most of their cabs seem to have a rather distinct upper mid character that isn't always ideal for my tonal needs.

My seemingly endless search for the perfect cab ended with Bergantino.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: DJ Bebop, SocksWthSandals, GreyBeard and 1 other person
#27
SocksWthSandals said:
That's one thing I'm skeptical about. There is one from 07 on a marketplace I inquired about but haven't heard back yet. That one was a made in China back tag. Would that be a better option?
Click to expand...
yes, many on this TB say once the chinese started making, the muffled nonsense was in the past...I have a Heritage 810...thats the one I would recommend...starting to see a bunch on Reverb...
 
  • Like
Reactions: SocksWthSandals
#30
Thumpin6string said:
With all the bass cab choices available today, I can't see why an 810 would be considered. Too big, too heavy and I've never heard one that sounded that great. Of course, this is IMHO.
Click to expand...
Once I found the SVT 212av, I dont really bring out the 810 unless its outside unsupported gig because of the reasons you mentioned about size and weight... Different strokes for different folks...but it does feel good to me to stand in front of the fridge and play loud...I engage the "ultral low" and go....
 
  • Like
Reactions: DJ Bebop
#32
I've never been an SVT fan - they're not very snappy and a little too "wooly" for me on the low side of things. Folks that are into SVTs usually contend that it's the 810E that's the issue there. To be fair, I've never played an SVT without the 810E under it, so I can't say myself
 
#33
FugaziBomb said:
I've never been an SVT fan - they're not very snappy and a little too "wooly" for me on the low side of things. Folks that are into SVTs usually contend that it's the 810E that's the issue there. To be fair, I've never played an SVT without the 810E under it, so I can't say myself
Click to expand...
It sounds good to me, and to the bands I sit with under the 212av cab....I also have a V4b that is 1/2 the weight, and 7/8ths the tone, so I have options...BUT I am understanding the "baked in" Ampeg tone not for everyone on the SVT line...:)
 
  • Like
Reactions: FRoss6788
#35
I had a similar era Ampeg fridge. It was a pig. It was made with OSB rather than Baltic ply and had blurry horrible output. I used it with excellent condition 70s SVT and V4 heads, and even modern heads. Nothing improved it. Hauling it was only bearable due to the tilt back design, but it still weighed a whole lot more than it should have. I also owned a 70's flat back birch ply (non tilt) with original great condition speakers. The flatback cab was wonderful, even though the tilt design would have made that cab nearly perfect for my application.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gopherbassist
#36
"Personally I can't stand the tone of Ampeg 810s (or any other sealed Ampeg cabs I've tested). Poor lows. Muddy low mids. Nasal and "hollow" sounding in the higher mids. Not my thing at all. Of course this is just MY opinion, but you asked for it.;)
I've never tested a Markbass 8x10 but based on the voicing of every other Markbass cab I've played I'm pretty sure I would prefer it over the Ampeg 810. But I would prefer almost ANYHING over the Ampeg 810.:vomit:
But Markbass isn't my favorite either. Most of their cabs seem to have a rather distinct upper mid character that isn't always ideal for my tonal needs."

IMO: Almost everything tonal description in the above statement actually outlines what is required in a loud band with no FOH, in order to be heard. Sometimes, even onstage with FOH. Bedroom tonal characteristics or playing in a quiet band are a different thing. I actually prefer a fatter low end in a solo setting or with a band as long as I'm not stepping into someone else's space, sonic-ally speaking.
 
#39
SocksWthSandals said:
Wanting to pull the trigger on an ampeg 8x10 (2005 I think) cabinet. I feel like the Markbass just is a bit too bright on the mids and highs and just sounds maybe a bit too muffled on the low ends. Is that a smart move? I know gone is something subjective but I have always liked the ampeg tones.

(Bonus picture of Oliver for your enjoyment)
Click to expand...


Does the Markbass cab have yellow cone drivers in it? :laugh:
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom
Back