1. Please take 30 seconds to register your free account to remove most ads, post topics, make friends, earn reward points at our store, and more!  
     
    TalkBass.com has been uniting the low end since 1998.  Join us! :)

Thumb 4 versus Thumb 5

Discussion in 'Basses [BG]' started by Jsonnenblick, Dec 1, 2000.


  1. Hi. I bought a used Warwick Thumb 5 bolt-on about a month ago, and am wondering whether I should try trading for a 4. The differences are narrower string spacing on the 5, and the fact that the "neck" pu on the 5 is far, far closer to the bridge than the neck pu on the 4.

    I haven't been in a store that had both a thumb 4 and a thumb 5 simultaneously, so I can't compare easily.

    Your thoughts? Specifically, does the 4 get closer to a Fender J tone? It's hard to get the sort of boosted mids on the 5 that a Fender gets when one pu is rolled off a bit, I guess because the pu's are too close together. . .

    FWIW, the Thumb 5 does have a kiiillllliing B string!

    . . . but so does my other 5, a custom J-style with EMG's and a Modulus graphite neck.
     
  2. I have a Thumb 5 NT, and also a Thumb 4 NT. The 5 is much heavier (by just over a pound), is somewhat neck-heavy, and also feels not unlike a base-ball bat, but has great tone (I use Elixirs). The Thumb 4 feels much nicer, is lighter, has a much more comfortable neck (not unlike a Rickenbacker), and also has a great tone (Pyramid Golds).

    Hope this helps -

    - Wil

    (for pics see: http://www.k1wd.com/music/bass/bass.htm )
     
  3. Deano Destructo

    Deano Destructo Music Man/Upton addict. Hasn't slept since 1979. Supporting Member

    Dec 10, 2000
    Seattle, WA.
    Warwick has also just realeased the option of wider necks on both the Thumb4 and 5 for about $160.00 or so(as if there not rich enough). Just thoughtyou'd like to know.