tremendously stupid question, please humour me...

Discussion in 'Effects [BG]' started by strangemusic, Jun 20, 2005.

  1. I was searching the forum the other day, and kept coming upon a myriad of people in the Effects forum spelling the word "looper" as "loooper", with three o's in it.

    Why the heck? Is this intentional or am I just crazy?
  2. my GODS! that was fast, thank you super...

    *bows head in mock shame*
  3. Its all in the name ;)
  4. prob guys...i had that same problem too!
  5. NJL


    Apr 12, 2002
    San Antonio
    so did i and then i finally bought a loooper!

  6. xan


    Sep 10, 2004
    Perth, Australia
    ...although - a loooper is a looper too :)
  7. Matt Till

    Matt Till

    Jun 1, 2002
    Edinboro, PA
    I would have assumed typos ahoy.
  8. i didn't know that looopers had looping!
  9. Bryan R. Tyler

    Bryan R. Tyler TalkBass: Usurping My Practice Time Since 2002 Staff Member Administrator Gold Supporting Member

    May 3, 2002
    They don't. Looopers don't offer loopng capabilites- they aren't effects pedals; they are only signal chain controlers.
  10. thats what i thought...what do you mean by that xan?
  11. xan


    Sep 10, 2004
    Perth, Australia
    hehe forget it i was just playing with words.. 'loop' in the sense that it creates a effects loop. maybe i should just delete that post to save confusion..
  12. lol sorry about that! i get it now!
  13. so, using said looper device, I could accomplish a setup of this type?

    Bass>Tuner>Loooper>(Loop with distortion in it)/(Clean channel with Bass Xciter and maybe Chorus in it)>Amp

    or is there a better way to route it?
  14. TaySte_2000


    Jun 23, 2001
    Manchester, UK
    Endorsing Artist: Mojohand, Subdecay, Overwater, Matamp
    Yeah get a tuner out on the looper so you can silently tune, and your tuner isn't in you signal path.

    Bass>Loooper>(Loop with distortion in it)/(Clean channel with Bass Xciter and maybe Chorus in it)/(Tuner Mute to Tuner)>Amp