Hey guys, Why on Earth is Warwick praised all over these forums, but at the same time everyone says they (Thumbs and other product lines) suffer from serious neck-dive, the basses are too heavy, and anything post '96 or so sucks? How can a bass company be regarded as highly as those who have been consistent with their product, and produce crap? I know there have been a lot of Warwick threads on why this, and why that, but I failed to find one where this issue has been addressed? I'm seriously considering getting a Thumb NT, but if it's commonly known that Warwick has not made a good Thumb in several years, forget it. I'll get something else. And what of this neck-dive problem? It's obvious that it's been a problem for years, but nothing has been done about it. Has Warwick addressed this to their customer base? I'm not knocking Warwick, because I do like their products. That is aside from their cheap-ass plate cover on the back. But I want to really know why all of you here love their products, but tell everyone who would like to purchase one to try and find one a decade old. I'm pretty synonymous with being a thread killer around here for some reason. It's either because I'm percieved as a dick or I just don't create interesting enough posts. But seriously guys, I'd like you to discuss this. Thanks.