Well, I got pointed towards a guy selling an '89 Thumb for a good price. I e-mailed him, but he didn't e-mail back yet, going by his e-mail, he's from the defence force, so that may be something to do with it. I was going to take it, as it's a cheap price, but if I can't get it or onto the guy, i'm going to be looking at getting another one, or a Stage II Streamer. Both will be bought used, and pre '98 hopefully (for the thinner neck). Now, I want that nice warwick growl that I know they can both get (Thumb more-so though?) but there's a couple other factors i'd like to put in. My band is described pretty much as hard psychedelic rock, which i'd like a nice bit of growl for, and a cutting midrange/top end to really cut through, also with deep bass. Apart from the band, I'm into anything from hip-hop to jazz/latin, hard rock, heavy/metal, psych etc and a fair few solo artists. So which of the two basses is the most versatile? Also, can they get close to either ones tone, or are they too different? Feel wise, i'm after something that's low action and easy to fret and play, thin neck and a nice string spacing, not too small, not too big. Which of these two basses is going to suit me and all those styles better? Cheers.