I read a definition here, today, which was different from what I looked up from the experts at Quora, and also different from my own rule of thumb (which is admittedly eccentric). The wizards of Quora say a singer is someone who sings, but a vocalist is a really good singer. That anyone can be a singer but a vocalist is another level entirely. I think that maybe there ought to be more of an unarguable difference than that.
Hi sears Etymology[edit] Borrowed from Old French vocal, borrowed from Latin vōcālis. Doublet of vowel. (source: Wiktionary) A vocalist is a singer who had French (or Latin) at school! greetings Wise(b)ass
I am totally fine with them being synonymous. The distinction I made in my mind was that a vocalist is a singer + microphone. I was thinking, wouldn't it be nice to repurpose "vocalist" to mean, someone who plays the microphone? Bing was more of a vocalist; guys like Van Morrison and Springsteen are more singers. Singers can fill a hall without amplification by using proper singing technique. I doubt Justin Timberlake can -- not to take anything away from his artistry. You can be both singer and vocalist. Someone like Whitney Houston comes to mind. Anyway, enough raving.
I consider vocalist to be a more generic term. For example I consider someone doing Cookie Monster vocals in a metal band to be a vocalist but not a singer. It’s not something I’m super picky about though. It’s not like people calling a kick drum a bass drum for example (they are two completely different instruments that aren’t even played with the same limbs lol)
Both are a special breed that need much attention. They usually have a sore throat for several months of the year and can be incredibly deaf and require more monitor than any normal human can tolerate. Both are one in the same.