Just want to take a quick straw poll and see what folks here think. The story: I joined up with a drummer and guitarist last February. We added a singer/rhythm guitarist about March or April and a female singer (backup and occasional lead) maybe June or so. It's a pretty good group of people and drama-free. However, since the summer I've had this running frustration with the slow pace we seem to be moving at, which mostly seems like the singer's delay learning songs and related issues. (I've complained about this previously -- http://www.talkbass.com/forum/showthread.php?t=699348&highlight= and http://www.talkbass.com/forum/showthread.php?t=665571&highlight= and http://www.talkbass.com/forum/showthread.php?t=647199&highlight=) So I started wondering if I should think about moving on. Replied to a CL ad looking for a bassist. It's a cover band doing 90s and current stuff, they say they have two venues they play pretty regularly and looking to expand to play out 3-4 times a month. It would mean picking up a full set list in a month or less with very little overlap from the old one, but mostly not very hard stuff. In an ideal world I'd like to play in both but don't realistically have the time. So what do you guys think I should go for: my old band, that I like and is familiar, but that is only limping towards playing out, or a new band, with whatever its unknown issues may be, that I could get out with almost immediately?