Thank you for your re-writing your feedback, Quadzilla. I appreciate and respect your take on the events.
However, I do disagree with the timeline of events, the condition of the instrument, it's frets, it's action, and what was stated that I "wanted no part of". You shipped the instrument back before I could answer all of your messages to me. I refunded the full purchase price immediately upon arrival and videoed myself playing as I normally play.
As full disclosure and to allow others to decide for themselves should they care to do so, the actual transcript of the transaction can be found in screen captured form at the link below. Also note, I am a luthier and bass tech, as disclosed in my profile and my discourse with Quadzilla.
(click the image to zoom in after the jump)
https://darrenmichaelsbass.files.wordpress.com/2015/11/fredyankefellow.jpg
My negative feedback on Quadzilla, which was posted before he left his negative feedback on me, can be found under his trading profile as a link cannot be shared here. It includes a video of me playing the bass before it was sold and a clip of me playing the bass immediately upon it's return. At the time of this posting, Quadzilla's and my initial back and forth about the negative feedback I left for the sale is in the comments there as well. Talkbass moderators may deem it necessary to alter that.
Also necessary for inclusion—upon leaving feedback for the sale to Quadzilla, I received a message from him to my private email account which he only had access to due to the sales transaction. I emailed him back indicating that I will be including his message on Talkbass to which he replied "Have at it." His entire email is quoted in the following,
Fred Yankellow (aka Quadzilla) said, "I'm 99.7% certain that the negative feedback you left me will have 0% chance of preventing anyone on talkbass dealing with me. You quite obviously are the angry one. Get some meds man (or get back on them). You obviously have some issues....."
Lastly, to address the pictures of the bass's frets with the paper.
1)This is a piece of copy paper in the photo, not a metal feeler gauge or other object that could not be torn, cut, or otherwise manipulated to look like it's underneath a fret.
2)Bound fretboards do not have a fret tang all the way to the binding. The tang is in the middle of the fret and cut short of binding as to not crack the binding.
3)Knowing the information about bound fretboards, take a close look at the other photo Quadzilla sent me (note the different angle and that it is not included in his feedback). The photo is below this bullet point. If you draw an imaginary line following the edge of the binding under the fret and follow the angle of the paper, you'll notice the paper is NOT crossing the intersection of these two lines as that's where the tang is seated into the fretboard. To restate: in the middle of the fret where the binding meets the board, there is a tang seated in the wood that keeps the paper from going further. This is a seated fret. Remember once again that Quadzilla did not include this photo in the feedback above, but it was in his messages to me.
http://i241.photobucket.com/albums/ff175/Quadzilla69/New/20151105_130326_zpsnfc6moz5.jpg
I feel I politely and respectfully made my case. Decide for yourself should you feel inclined to so.
Quadzilla, I wish you well in your future endeavors and harbor no ill will towards you. Be well and may peace be with you.
Darren Michaels
However, I do disagree with the timeline of events, the condition of the instrument, it's frets, it's action, and what was stated that I "wanted no part of". You shipped the instrument back before I could answer all of your messages to me. I refunded the full purchase price immediately upon arrival and videoed myself playing as I normally play.
As full disclosure and to allow others to decide for themselves should they care to do so, the actual transcript of the transaction can be found in screen captured form at the link below. Also note, I am a luthier and bass tech, as disclosed in my profile and my discourse with Quadzilla.
(click the image to zoom in after the jump)
https://darrenmichaelsbass.files.wordpress.com/2015/11/fredyankefellow.jpg
My negative feedback on Quadzilla, which was posted before he left his negative feedback on me, can be found under his trading profile as a link cannot be shared here. It includes a video of me playing the bass before it was sold and a clip of me playing the bass immediately upon it's return. At the time of this posting, Quadzilla's and my initial back and forth about the negative feedback I left for the sale is in the comments there as well. Talkbass moderators may deem it necessary to alter that.
Also necessary for inclusion—upon leaving feedback for the sale to Quadzilla, I received a message from him to my private email account which he only had access to due to the sales transaction. I emailed him back indicating that I will be including his message on Talkbass to which he replied "Have at it." His entire email is quoted in the following,
Fred Yankellow (aka Quadzilla) said, "I'm 99.7% certain that the negative feedback you left me will have 0% chance of preventing anyone on talkbass dealing with me. You quite obviously are the angry one. Get some meds man (or get back on them). You obviously have some issues....."
Lastly, to address the pictures of the bass's frets with the paper.
1)This is a piece of copy paper in the photo, not a metal feeler gauge or other object that could not be torn, cut, or otherwise manipulated to look like it's underneath a fret.
2)Bound fretboards do not have a fret tang all the way to the binding. The tang is in the middle of the fret and cut short of binding as to not crack the binding.
3)Knowing the information about bound fretboards, take a close look at the other photo Quadzilla sent me (note the different angle and that it is not included in his feedback). The photo is below this bullet point. If you draw an imaginary line following the edge of the binding under the fret and follow the angle of the paper, you'll notice the paper is NOT crossing the intersection of these two lines as that's where the tang is seated into the fretboard. To restate: in the middle of the fret where the binding meets the board, there is a tang seated in the wood that keeps the paper from going further. This is a seated fret. Remember once again that Quadzilla did not include this photo in the feedback above, but it was in his messages to me.
http://i241.photobucket.com/albums/ff175/Quadzilla69/New/20151105_130326_zpsnfc6moz5.jpg
I feel I politely and respectfully made my case. Decide for yourself should you feel inclined to so.
Quadzilla, I wish you well in your future endeavors and harbor no ill will towards you. Be well and may peace be with you.
Darren Michaels
1 - The bass had several frets that were not seated. 2 or 3 of these I could actually get a piece of paper under. The paper easily fit under the frets between the fret and the fret board and I could push the paper about 1/16" into the surface of the fret board under the frets. This caused buzzing when digging in with medium finger style, especially when attempting to let a note to ring. Had to jack up the action very high to prevent buzz.
I took the bass to a very well known and reputable luthier (Mike Forester of Forester Customs). He found the same issue and told me to fix it, several frets would have to be pulled, glued, reseated and leveled. Would have cost me $175 if I had kept her. The bass was only $320, so I asked to return it.
He posted videos of him playing the bass after he got it back. I'm sure that he had the action high and played with a light touch because if you lower the action to a reasonable level (especially on the E side) and dig in at all, it buzzes and rattles.
2 - The neck pickup's output was about 1/2 of the other pickups, even when I raised the height. This should have at least ben disclosed in my humble opinion.
I sent him pictures of the paper under the frets and also told him he could even call my luthier to let him tell him his findings with the bass. He wanted no parts of it.
Because of these issues (especially the neck issues), I asked for a return and asked because of the severity of undisclosed issues, that he pickup return shipping. He refused. I offered to split shipping with him. He refused again.
Addl info:
These two pictures alone should have justified the return. There were others similar frets as well. You can clearly see the paper well under the fret under the fret board. Looking down the neck, you could see these frets raised and higher than the others. This caused buzzing and rattling on the E string with anything lower than medium action. He refused to acknowledge this and claimed that frets like this were "normal".
My luthier, Mike Forrester (who is very well known and reputable) concurred that the frets had issues and many needed to be pulled, reseated (and glued) and leveled to make it right.
Timeline from my side
I buy the bass
I receive the bass
Upon unboxing the bass, I immediately notice a fret issue and contacted the seller letting him know and also stating I was going to take it to my luthier to examine
I offer to eat the cost if the repair is not too much as I really like the bass and did want to keep it
I take it to my luthier and he confirms the frets are bad and says it will be expensive to repair ($175)
I let the seller know and ask to return. I also ask for a prepaid shipping label since the fret issue should have been disclosed.
Seller says no to shipping so I ask to split. You again say no.
I asked that since the bass was going to be in route, would the seller consider processing my refund once shipped (after I provide the tracking), because Paypal refund process can take several days.
Seller again refuses.
Very tough to work with. I would avoid.