• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

New Gibson Explorer Longscale

TBird1958

As a matter of fact....I am your Queen!
Staff member
Gold Supporting Member
Mar 13, 2008
18,898
142,252
Seattle Washington
Disclosures
Endorsing Artist Mike Lull T Bass pickups, The Bass Shop, Seattle WA.
Just thought I'd post some thoughts about the new long scale Explorer Gibson has just released.
First, it's big - Like Thunderbird size but the body is thicker and has a very solid feel ,and it features a set neck, using one of my straps adjusted for a 'Bird I found the bass comfortable on my shoulder at about 10lbs and that while the headstock is small the neck will seek level if you let go. Shortening the strap really didn't change this either and I'm a bit surprised by it since the fin on the upper 'bout is so big, for me it would not be an issue because of how my right arm arm and hand rest on the bass when I'm playing - the headstock is smaller than a modern 'Bird. I found the neck to be a pretty comfy fit for my smallish hands, not quite as much taper from the high to low frets as a 'Bird, but same width at the nut and just a bit thicker in cross section. With good reason we and others have slagged Gibson on QC, but this bass is really nice, the finish is flawless and nicely done, I've looked it over very carefully and found no bad spots - It just doesn't photograph too well, anyway, the craftsmanship on this example is notably good - Kudos Gibson! The factory set up is certainly acceptable even to my fussiness, were I picking this bass up and playing it in a store I'd be favorably impressed, a few small adjustments to suit my hands and I'd be happy. Fret ends are dressed nicely and all appear well seated too. So I finally had sometime to really enjoy playing this bass - what a pleasant surprise! Since I'm primarily a pick player I started there, with everything dimed using a .73 Dunlop the bass has a great tone - Think of The Fixx on "Red Sky at Night". The position of the neck pup gives it a nice bass tone without mudiness, while the bridge pup tends to accentuate upper mids. Soloing the pups with a pick left me knowing I'd never just use the bridge pup - too thin, not enough bass, a bit of the neck pup is needed for a useful tone. The neck pup solo'd was a nice surprise with good usable tone and variation based on hand placement, note decay is almost 7ender like, I suspect the set neck may have something to do with that too. Overall with a pick I like this bass a lot. I'm not much of a fingerstyle player, with the band only two songs require it, at home however I make it a point to keep my chops and strength up so I tried the bass seated on a stool with the lower bout on my right leg, it's very comfortable and handles well. I found that backing off the neck pup a little gave a nice tone and again a bit quicker note decay and the neck pup solo'd was again very pleasing, full rounded tone and good variations can be had by shifting your right hand position.

So what didn't I like? Well, first the mixed black and chrome hardware, I don't know the reasons since the bass could be done all one way or the other as Gibson is doing the chrome TB Plus, or conversly all black. I also think a pickgard would look great too, along with a pup selector switch . For most I think the bass's limitations would be based on it's outward appearance, not it's tonal abilities - it may not look like it belongs at church or country gig, perfect for that Scorpions tribute band tho :p

Some pics
1325445880.jpg

1325445852.jpg

1325445931.jpg

1325446035.jpg


Body thickness
1325445898.jpg


The test rig
1325446103.jpg


Nice tonal variation from shifting your right hand position
1325446115.jpg

1325446129.jpg


How you know it's at my house.
1325282731.jpg
 
I had an Gibson Explorer back in the 80's (go figure,right) Anyway, I really loved that bass but sold it do to economic reasons. It always played well and at the time my taste in different bass tones was non-existant. If it went to 11 and had some balls it was good. (I know there are a lot of jokes begging to be added to this line, but I'll resist.)I'm glad to see Gibson building this bass again. If I had the extra coin I might give another a run. If nothing else I'm still left with my explorer tatoo.
 
Thanks for the detailed write up Mark! I'm surprised at the 1.5" nut width- I figured it would be wider, more like an Epi bird. I do think it is a bit confused on whether it wants to be chrome or black. I think if I liked the sound of the stock pups, I'd at least add some silver top knobs and maybe some chrome trim rings for the pups.

Does the neck angle away from the body like a T-bird, or are they pretty much straight or in line with each other?
 
Thanks for the detailed write up Mark! I'm surprised at the 1.5" nut width- I figured it would be wider, more like an Epi bird. I do think it is a bit confused on whether it wants to be chrome or black. I think if I liked the sound of the stock pups, I'd at least add some silver top knobs and maybe some chrome trim rings for the pups.

Does the neck angle away from the body like a T-bird, or are they pretty much straight or in line with each other?


I like the 1.5" nut width too, tho the neck is a bit thicker in cross section than a Gibson 'Bird - I found it comfortable to play, much better for me than the two Epi's I'd tried out some time back. I really think a black or chrome option for the hardware would be nice, as would a PG. And yes, the neck does angle away from the body like a 'Bird.
@ Baird6869 It is similar to a contemporary 'Bird in tone but pup placement and the set neck give you some differences and notably quicker note decay.