• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join free Log in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Changing Pots - What Can I expect?

Fajah

Fajah

Apr 30, 2006
582
4
Toronto, Canada
#1
I've been searching around and got a some basic info, but I think I need something a bit more specific. At the present time, my bass is passive with an HB in the bridge and a SD Basslines stacked jazz in the neck. My bass has been a work in progress and so it didn't start out this way and still has 250k pots and a .047 cap.

I want to brighten up the tone a bit while still maintaing the bottom end and thinking of replacing the pots to 500k. Not sure which cap I should go with so a recommendation would be helpful. Is going to 500k pots the right direction for what I'm looking for and what can I basically expect tone wise if I make the change?

Thanks in advance.
 
#2
Let me ask this another way:

The wiring diagram that comes with the SD stacked jazz neck pickup shows 250k pots and a .047 cap. This is assuming one is installing two of them. However, I have the stock Douglas HB installed in the bridge. Based on this, would you;

1) Keep the 250k in for the neck. Don't know what a 500k pot would sound like.

2) Install a 500k pot for the HB.

3) Tone pot - not sure.

4) Keep or change the cap.
 
#5
Sure, try it and see. You might find that cap value a little dark for hot humbuckers like you have. A 0.02 might be less muddy when turned down.
 
#7
if you do try 500k volumes, be sure to get linear taper, as audio taper 500s will drop off way too fast from "10". (keep the tone pot audio taper regardless.)
 
#9
I've always used audio taper pots for both volume and tone controls. Three 500k pots are in the mail with a couple Sprague Orange Drop caps (.047 and .022). As soon as they arrive, the experiment will begin and this is what I plan to do:

1) Replace all the 250k pots with the 500k while leaving the existing ceramic .047 cap installed.

2) Replace the .047 with the .022 to hear the difference.

3) If I like the .022, I'll keep it. If not, I'll replace it with the Orange Drop .047.

Should be interesting and will report back when all is done.
 
#16
Diogenes said:
Are you sure about that? My experience has been that audio taper is correct for volume because volume/loudness/decible level does not follow a linear algorithm... but linear taper pots are used for tone.
Click to expand...
yep, try them and compare.

you'll find that linear volumes sweep evenly from 0 to 10, while audio volumes will drop off fast from 10. (especially higher values like 500k.)

you'll also find that linear tones do little until they're almost all the way down.

there's actually a fair number of threads about this around here; i've been making this argument for a little while, and the only pushback i ever get is from people who haven't tried it but want to quote stuff about the logarithmic nature of the ear. my response is that you don't plug basses into your ear, but into the front end of clean amplification systems (i.e., bass amps), and linear volumes just work more evenly.

so far, everyone who's tried it seems to prefer it.
 
#17
walterw said:
yep, try them and compare.

you'll find that linear volumes sweep evenly from 0 to 10, while audio volumes will drop off fast from 10. (especially higher values like 500k.)

you'll also find that linear tones do little until they're almost all the way down.

there's actually a fair number of threads about this around here; i've been making this argument for a little while, and the only pushback i ever get is from people who haven't tried it but want to quote stuff about the logarithmic nature of the ear. my response is that you don't plug basses into your ear, but into the front end of clean amplification systems (i.e., bass amps), and linear volumes just work more evenly.

so far, everyone who's tried it seems to prefer it.
Click to expand...

Well then you now have someone on your register who disagrees and prefers audio taper.;) I have retried linear volume pots many times these last few decades to see if maybe my ears have changed (believe it or not, you're not the only or first one to argue the case of linear pots) but the results are always the same. That's why I questioned your findings. My experience has been different than yours so I'll continue with whatever works for me. ;)
 
#18
Diogenes said:
Well then you now have someone on your register who disagrees and prefers audio taper.;) I have retried linear volume pots many times these last few decades to see if maybe my ears have changed (believe it or not, you're not the only or first one to argue the case of linear pots) but the results are always the same. That's why I questioned your findings. My experience has been different than yours so I'll continue with whatever works for me. ;)
Click to expand...
aha! What value pots, what kind of bass, and what didn't you like about them?
 
#19
walterw said:
aha! What value pots, what kind of bass, and what didn't you like about them?
Click to expand...

The brand names I can remember for the pots were Alpha and CTS... as for the ones I can't remember, whatever Mouser, Olsen Electronics and other local electronics stores were selling at the time. The values ran the gambit from 10k to 1M depending on what pickup configurations I was using, how I made them, what I was trying to accomplish and how I was wiring them. The basses were varied... mostly basses that I was building.

I think audio taper pots have smoother volume transitions... just as long as they're not wired "backwards" or a reverse audio pot is used when a "standard" audio pot is required.
 
#20
Diogenes said:
The values ran the gambit from 10k to 1M depending on what pickup configurations I was using, how I made them, what I was trying to accomplish and how I was wiring them.
Click to expand...
so you're saying you've never tried it, then. :D

I have noticed that with active basses things behave differently. a Marcus miller jazz for example (single coil pickups, 250k audio pots), will exibit the typical rapid dropoff in passive mode, but not nearly so much when the preamp is kicked in.

Also, when running a bunch of compression and/or distortion, audios will behave more evenly (which is why I always recommend them for guitar players doing anything other than pure jazz.)

but in the case of passive pickups, putting higher value pots in there to brighten things up will have the side effect of making the volume drop off too fast for most folks. linear volumes in this case will just work more evenly.
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom
Back