Recent content by tubenutq5

I am no longer allowed to comment on this subject. I have been warned so that is good enough for me. You win.

But all you are stating is hearsay and anecdotal evidence. You could get all of those people in one room and they could swear before God that what they say is true but that will never be enough unless they do it the way the government wants it done. That would be long term legitimate studies...

Explain why you would be skeptical of a study that says that when you actually have no studies that actually say that MJ does not have a addiction potential. You would have to put both of those research papers before a peer review before anybody could really dispute the facts on either side...

Yeah I guess so but so is non-annotated undocumented info on the pro-mj side. We are still standing in the same spot. Maybe even quasi-legalization will lead to more verifiable, peer reviewed data and we can make a more solid determination on that. Agreed?

Not even an attempt? I am glad you admitted that you "would not know where to start". This is quickly becoming a personal battle between you and I. Interesting. Give me one misstatement in that post. Will that make it easier?

To Mr. TYBO, If I told you I had read a study that just "suggested" that a withdrawal syndrome for MJ had been demonstrated would you believe me? Actually the withdrawal symptoms from say hydrocodone (as an example) is not overwhelmingly noticeable. A bit of nausea and a malaise for a day or...

Sorry Jimmy that was about 1969 or so in Hawaii. It was whatever was at the party so no name. Ha-ha....

You know just when I am ready to put the fire out you start fanning the flames. Prove to me specifically where I am wrong in my last post. Can you?!

You see, buddy, you seem not to be able to make your arguments without being personal. Don't you dare attack my credibility! What do you do for a living? Mow lawns in your marijuana induced stupor? But then you might be a brain surgeon or airline pilot and that is scary. Just as an add on. Both...

Reading your words makes me think of an old biblical admonition: "Do not cast pearls before swine". In today's parlance that means you can't reason with stupid so why try. Anyway, I concede the argument because there is nothing I can do about it anyway. And "Dude your harshing my mellow"...

OK we have to come to some agreement about what the word "impairment" means. If you use most any states description of an impaired driver on alcohol it is 0.08 correct? Whether you can function as the driver of a car at that level would depend on a lot of things including BMR and how tolerant...

OK Jimmy, Correct you didn't call me any names. Others did so that was just to level the playing field. Re: which article do I want? I already outlined those parameters. None of the articles I read fell within those parameters. Hence useless info on either side of the issue. Find me some...

OK Jimmy, let's roll. Ground rules: 1. you don't call me names and I won't call you names. In other words civilized. Capice? 2. As I concede that you know way more than I do about tube-driven amps you must give me credit for having a degree in Pharmacy and 35 years...

No Jimmy I am not a cop. I am a retired pharmacist. You are making the same mistake about the word "impaired" as the other guy did. A general term meaning incapable of performing certain tasks because of outside interference. Like drugs. Yes I know the difference between stimulants and...