TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
popped in the Tung-sol's last night. These are great tubes and fairly similar the the EH 12ax7.
They are a bit warmer/fatter sounding, a bit thicker mids/bottom, but still has upper mid clarity like the EH. The EH has a bit less bottom and a bit tighter/more controlled lows. The Tunsols are more "tubey" sounding. While they are warmer/tubey sounding, they still have great clarity, more so then the JJ's.
As it is right now, I have 1 Tungol 12ax7 in the Preamp section, and the EH 12ax7 in the Driver section. This is the best combination I've found so far. It yields a very clear, but warm/tubey tone. More controlled tone then stock and less boomy. More clarity in the upper mids as well.
Anyone who doesn't want to spend lots of coin on a tube exploration, but wants more clarity/articulation and less bottom bloom (tighter bottom), all the while having fat/warm mids, I highly recommend the Tung-sol 12ax7 in the pre, and EH 12ax7 in the driver section.
An advice: replace the two Russian 12AX7 tubes with a vintage Mullard yellow label in the leftmost socket and a Tung Sol grey plated from the early 60’ies with square halo getter in the other slot … then you’ll be in the bass Nirvana
I have replaced the two original Mesa 12AX7 tubes, so my settings are probably different. The vintage Mullard in the leftmost socket improves dramatically the lows and harmonics, while the Tung Sol in the other socket increases the overall sound presence and smooths the highs.
The one closest to the front panel is the preamp tube. The one closer to the middle is the MOSFET driver.
I have owned my WalkAbout for years now. It still impresses me, so I am quite biased on the lmii vs WalkAbout [kinda like Apples vs Oranges (Oranges will always win in CA & Fl, but Apples will never lose in WA)].
Any how for those who don't care about that, but want more "usable volume".
First roll the tubes in this case. JJ ECC83s allround I recommend these; because the ECC83 has clean sound and low microphonics. If you want more gain and never over drive. Or are willing to swap tube more often due to occational microphonics. Drop a JJ ECC803 in the 2nd postion, this is a long plate Hi-Fi tube. That usually ranks with the highest gain ratings on current production tubes. I've run Sovtek LPS and loved them, but position one killed them.
While the Tung Sol reissue results intrigue me and sound like what I'd like, I *really like* the newer long plate sovteks that came in my blackface walkabout.
I may have to order some of the Tung's at some point anyhoo...more clarity is always better, for me.
thx!
Are these the same tubes that are in the new blackface model?
http://www.tubedepot.com/so-12ax7lps.html
I happened to play one in a WA Scout at GC the other day and was surprised how much rounder and tighter it sounded compared to my silverface WA. I've had the Tung Sol reissues in there for a while now which definitely have more clarity and tighten things up some. But that blackface sounded amazing. I switched back to the stock Russian 2's, which brought back the darker mid-focused tone, but still grindy and looser in the bottom. Could be the GC effect with carpeted walls and other sound absorbing elements going on, but I figure for the price it's worth trying out if they're the same as what's in the blackface.
Thanks!
Zombie thread! Wah!