• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

2008 MIA Fender Jazz Rosewood vs Maple Fretboard

2008 MIA Jazz Bass Maple vs Rosewood Fretboard

  • Sunburst Maple Fretboard

    Votes: 121 48.2%
  • Sunburst Rosewood Fretboard

    Votes: 130 51.8%

  • Total voters
    251
I've only played the maple sunburst version of the 2008 MIA Jazz's and was blown away by how nice it felt and the sounds are like this bass came from heaven. So I'm thinking about getting a sunburst model but I'm still not sure what neck to get. I think the rosewood fretboard looks more traditional than the maple, but the maple looks beautiful too.

Tonally is there any difference between maple and the rosewood model?

What is your opinion on the looks of the maple or rosewood sunburst?
 
IME rosewood has a warmer tone and maple has a nice high end pop to it. It's only slight, I think the body wood would have more of an impact on the tonal quality of the instrument. I like maple boards for the feel but for tone I don't notice a difference.
 
I have a new rosewood model and am loving it as they did a very nice job of buffing the rosewood. But the maple is really nice as its actually finished as well and is quite glossy. Tone wise, I think the difference is pretty minimal. Try a few out in a store and decide what apeals to you more. You can't go wrong either way!
 
There is a tonal difference - I have owned 3 MIA Fender P basses with rosewood, and now own a 2008 with maple. The tonal difference is very slight, but noticeable. Maple is slightly more trebley than rosewood. I don't know about rosewood being warmer, warmer is a matter of opinion since sound doesn't have a temperature. Either way, no one but you will notice a difference in sound. I prefer the feel of rosewood, but maple ain't bad at all. Buy for looks, and in that case, with 3TS and a tort pickguard, the only possible answer is rosewood!!
 
There is a tonal difference - I have owned 3 MIA Fender P basses with rosewood, and now own a 2008 with maple. The tonal difference is very slight, but noticeable. Maple is slightly more trebley than rosewood. I don't know about rosewood being warmer, warmer is a matter of opinion since sound doesn't have a temperature.

By warmer I mean more of a low to low mid response as opposed to high mid and treble.
 
I am skeptical that there is any non-audiophile difference tonal difference between the two.

Pick one based on the color you prefer =)

As I recall, there was a recent poll that supports the lack of significant tonal difference.

+1 on the pick one based on your color preference, the difference between maple and rosewood is primarily cosmetic.

Personally I like rosewood with sunburst.
 
I actually am fortunate enough to have scored one of each of the 2008 models. Both are 3ts, one with maple and the other rosewood. I bought a rosewood one and then a fellow Tb'er had one for sale and we made a trade for another bass I had. I have had them a short time and I really like both.

I do personaly like the rosewood. It does seem a bit thicker/ darker. The maple is a bit bighter. But they do have different sets of strings. Roto's on the rosewood, the maple has Blue Steels. Both are great basses and in my opinion worth the bucks to get one.
 
Honestly, when I did that Maple vs Rosewood test, I couldn't hear a difference until I recorded the examples. But the results were so close that I realized it probably didn't matter in all but the most absolutely nit-picky situations. A subtle change of right-hand position could result in stronger tonal differences than fingerboard wood. In the end, I ended up choosing to use basses with rosewood fingerboards because I like the unfinished feel over the glossy maple boards.
So my recommendation is pick the one that FEELS better and use your right hand position or a bit of EQ to dial in some low mids or some high end however you like it.
 
I've got a Jazz Deluxe with a maple board and a Jazz Deluxe V with a pau ferro board, both MiA. The pau ferro is noticeably brighter than the maple, i.e. has a heavier load of treble. The other factor to throw in the mix is that the maple board is finished, which will remove higher frequencies, so maybe that's why the pau ferro guitar is brighter, but who can say for certain some other small difference in construction isn't in play. I've had lots of rosewood boards and generally agree that they're less bright than finished maple, which jibes with theory, but who knows if there aren't other construction factors and inconsistencies affecting the tone? The only safe bet is to a/b the guitars you're interested in to make sure there isn't a tonal issue that can't be compensated for via your rig.

I now, however, stay away from rosewood entirely, but only because it requires much more maintenance (twice a year, as opposed to once in ten years or never) than ebony, pau ferro, or finished maple, and other less common options. So for me, convenience is a big factor since most quality instruments sound pretty good. Rick is an exception because the rosewood is finished, but the Rick sound isn't very versatile.

I've always considered the "feel" thing to be b.s. I mean, is there anyone here whose fingers contact the fretboard of a fretted instrument when your fingers are moving? Don't the strings get in the way?
 
Coming from the hard rock, ****ing the ***k out of your strings with a plectrum perspective I find it's alot easier to tell. Granted though when playing mellower music it's not as apparent. I still think I can notice a difference though (I worked out the rosewood/maple blind test thing a while ago fairly easily). I wouldn't call maple board a "bright" sound though.

The feel thing is more about how solid the fretboard feels against the string then your fingers for me. Maybe it's just me being a bit sloppy and not having great technique, but there's always a bit of finger that comes in contact with the board and I prefer the feel of maple. Guitars are a different issue cos I quite like rosewood then, but I generally prefer the solid sounds and feel of maple for bass.

What kind of sunburst is this Jazz anyway? I personally reckon that maple only really works with burst if it's got the old amber lacquer finish kinda vibe going on.
 
Even if people believe that there's little-to-no audible difference between the two (which I dispute) I can "feel" the difference between maple and rosewood in the way a bass resonates against my body as I'm playing.

...but beyond that, I simply like both the tone and the "feel" of maple more than rosewood and generally think it looks better with most finishes. There are certainly a few where rosewood is the better choice - I can't imagine a Spector with a maple board, which certainly make up for the lack there by having either complete bodies or large parentages in some models. However, generally I prefer a maple 'boar, if given the choice would choose it, and if ever get the opportunity for a "custom" bass would include it.