• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

My 74 jazz Bass is not reliced, it's just old.

In this age when distressing an instrument has become an art form, there are still some cool distressed instruments out there that are just plain old. Since I first posted pictures of my 74 Jazz Bass, there have been several fellow TalkBassers who just can't believe that it can actually be in it's current condition entirely from age. Don't hate, aprreciate. Here is the story;

I bought my 74 Jazz in the late 80s at a Detroit pawn shop for $250. It was already pretty beat up when I got it. In the 20 odd years that I have had it, more and more paint has fallen off of it (it is almost a process like rust, once it starts, you can't stop it). The only wear that I can point to and recall the instant that it happened is the pattern above the pickgaurd, along the top body contour. I took it to my luthier about two years ago to have some work done. For some reason he put tape on the body, and when he pulled the tape off a great deal of the finish came off with it. For a split second I contemplated getting angry, but I quickly figured that if the paint was that loose, it was bound to fall off anyway (and besides, it's not like the finish was immaculate in the first place). Everything else is strictly from age and use.

I gigged with it for about a year in the mid 90s, I suppose a good deal of wear happened in that time, but nothing that I can point to and say, "That is when that happened." I have had several necks on it, and for most of it's life it has had a 1977 fretless Precision neck on it. The current neck is from 1973. The pickguard is not original, I never had the original pickguard.

I don't much like taking it out of the house anymore. My playing aside, it is the sweetest sounding bass that I have ever heard. If I could only have one instrument, this would be the one.

DSCN1875.jpg

DSCN1878.jpg


Here it is with a 1976 fretted Precision neck that is currently on my 73 LPB Jazz
DSCN0363.jpg

74jazzbody.jpg


Here is the part that the tape took off. I can't remember how worn it was before that happened. None of the wear on the bass is worn to the wood, just to the undercoat (you might notice that the worn parts are still shiny). That is something that the reliced instruments always seem to get wrong.
DSCN1889.jpg


There is much cool checking and cracking that is hard to capture on camera. Here is a try.
DSCN1936.jpg



If you want to hear the bass (with the fretless neck), go to Link Removed (if I'm not supposed to do this, just let me know). The first 3 songs feature it.

Thanks for taking a look,

Peace
 
IMG_0974.jpg


IMG_0977.jpg


IMG_0968.jpg


IMG_0969.jpg


IMG_0971.jpg


i need to get some better pics of my baby, but it's a '68 Jazz with a '74 neck. most of the wear was already there when i bought it about 5 years ago, but i've definitely added a fair amount myself (most notably some buckle rash and the deep indent between the pickups. i pick-scratched my way through the finish and into the wood over the course of its life with me. Rock & Roll is unforgiving. it's much deeper than it was at the time these pics were taken.).

i love the look of reliced instruments, but there's something about natural wear that just gets me.
 
In this age when distressing an instrument has become an art form, there are still some cool distressed instruments out there that are just plain old. Since I first posted pictures of my 74 Jazz Bass, there have been several fellow TalkBassers who just can't believe that it can actually be in it's current condition entirely from age. Don't hate, aprreciate. Here is the story;

I bought my 74 Jazz in the late 80s at a Detroit pawn shop for $250. It was already pretty beat up when I got it. In the 20 odd years that I have had it, more and more paint has fallen off of it (it is almost a process like rust, once it starts, you can't stop it). The only wear that I can point to and recall the instant that it happened is the pattern above the pickgaurd, along the top body contour. I took it to my luthier about two years ago to have some work done. For some reason he put tape on the body, and when he pulled the tape off a great deal of the finish came off with it. For a split second I contemplated getting angry, but I quickly figured that if the paint was that loose, it was bound to fall off anyway (and besides, it's not like the finish was immaculate in the first place). Everything else is strictly from age and use.

I gigged with it for about a year in the mid 90s, I suppose a good deal of wear happened in that time, but nothing that I can point to and say, "That is when that happened." I have had several necks on it, and for most of it's life it has had a 1977 fretless Precision neck on it. The current neck is from 1973. The pickguard is not original, I never had the original pickguard.

I don't much like taking it out of the house anymore. My playing aside, it is the sweetest sounding bass that I have ever heard. If I could only have one instrument, this would be the one.

DSCN1875.jpg

DSCN1878.jpg


Here it is with a 1976 fretted Precision neck that is currently on my 73 LPB Jazz
DSCN0363.jpg

74jazzbody.jpg


Here is the part that the tape took off. I can't remember how worn it was before that happened. None of the wear on the bass is worn to the wood, just to the undercoat (you might notice that the worn parts are still shiny). That is something that the reliced instruments always seem to get wrong.
DSCN1889.jpg


There is much cool checking and cracking that is hard to capture on camera. Here is a try.
DSCN1936.jpg



If you want to hear the bass (with the fretless neck), go to Link Removed (if I'm not supposed to do this, just let me know). The first 3 songs feature it.

Thanks for taking a look,

Peace


I do not like beat up looking instruments like this however if you're tellin the truth (not saying you're lying but damn thats beat up) I will give you mad props, you at least legitmately earned the battle scars on yours and didn't pay to have someone make the bass look like that.
 
Reliced? Don't care.

It looks great and you love it. that's all that counts. For me, the reliced issue comes into play when you resell it. If you (the seller) misrepresent the damage as wear and tear instead of a relice, then that's just dishonest.
 
What have you been doing to it! Honestly. Nobody could get a bass looking like that with 'natural w&t'... nobody. I've had my '62 Jazz since 74 and I thought it was beaten up when I bought it.

Link Removed

It looks new compared to yours. ***?

Nice BTW.

What about Jaco? His bass was pretty banged up, even more than mine (have you seen the condition it was in before it became what it looks like now?). Like I stated, it was already beat when I got it, and it has been an ongoing process in the length of my ownership, like rust. I am not against artificially aged instruments, but that is something I would do to a new instrument to make it look old, not an old instrument to make it look old. That, I would want to preserve.

I am actually a very light player and don't put much wear on my instruments, but this one has a mind of it's own, just looking at it makes paint fall off.