"a) many people have 5K to spend on a bow and don't think that's an excessive amount of money;
b) the Glasser company is doing very, very well, has been in business for a very, very long time, are not fools, and would not design a product which did not sell;
c) unless you've actually played with this bow, you might want to reserve judgment until you do."
All true... but...
a) $5K is not "excessive" but as Arcus has found out the hard way, most people are VERY hesitant to spend any more than 1/2 that on a cf bow... and the market price point for cf bows (Karrbow, Gage, Lucchi, etc) seems to peak at @$1K -$1.5, especially with good (Finale) and ok (Yita etc) cf bows available for a third of the price;
a1) I've tried several $4K and $5K bows (Lucchi, Halsey, etc) and "settled" for some in the $2k -$3K range (Prochownik, Marco Pasquino, Milan Oubrecht) that were every bit as good, if not better.
It seemed to me (which is why I was so stunned in the first place) that the "extra" two or three grand was a factor of the maker's name, marketability, hand-crafted quality, and, especially, resale/retained value.
Even if the bow was stunning on a Lipkins/Rubino etc level, I can't see it holding its value; so I have to say that marketing strategy escapes me, unless (as when VW did its Phaeton etc) the point is to say, "wow - Glasser makes a $5K bow!" and get people talking about (but ultimately not buying) the product;
b) the Glasser company has been doing well for a long time based on student level bows and, more recently, improved cf bows in the under $500.00 (I had one of their "braided" cf bows for a while and it was quite good, actually); again my only point was not to question the quality of the bow as much as to ask what were they thinking in their strategy.
Louis