I took mine to all kinds of gigs, form rock clubs to wineries, outdoor family art venues, to huge festival stages, and anywhere in between.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
No - the similarity is only superficial.I believe that's pretty much the same as the original Rivoli, just his signature model. Sort of lilke calling a Clapton Stratocaster a Clapton.
Nope, the LP Signature has a "[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]"; as for the Jack Casady Signature, according to the man himself (while he calls it a Gibson in the passage the context seem to point to the Epiphone model*) it "is a true hollow body. It has a light pine fluted block that's about a five eighths of an inch in depth attached to the back of the body but there's an actual space between that and the top of about three quarters of an inch so that the fluted block there dampens it enough to keep it from feeding back but it still has an acoustic quality".Entirely Solid
Right - I actually meant hollow - wrote the wrong word, must have been having a moment. I've fixed my original post.Nope, the LP Signature has a "[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]"; as for the Jack Casady Signature, according to the man himself (while he calls it a Gibson in the passage the context seem to point to the Epiphone model*) it "is a true hollow body. It has a light pine fluted block that's about a five eighths of an inch in depth attached to the back of the body but there's an actual space between that and the top of about three quarters of an inch so that the fluted block there dampens it enough to keep it from feeding back but it still has an acoustic quality".
*Also, IIRC - and I admit I might not - some owners here have confirmed these construction details; in case Casady is referring to the original in the above description, it at least confirms the latter's semi-hollow nature; I do believe this is also the case for the Epi model, but I'm not sure about what differences, if any, are there construction-wise between the two.
Oops. Darn it, I should have guessed it was the case.Right - I actually meant hollow - wrote the wrong word, must have been having a moment.
I don't know what I'd call it, it's not a traditional semihollow or full hollow, because of that reinforcement running along the back - the top isn't "carrying" the string tension like it is on a full hollow. But it's certainly way "more hollow" than a traditional semihollow (which are solid all the way from the neck to the bridge, with hollows only on the side). With the Jack, most of the top, except for the bridge area itself, is free floating to vibrate.Nope, the LP Signature has a "[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]"; as for the Jack Casady Signature, according to the man himself (while he calls it a Gibson in the passage the context seem to point to the Epiphone model*) it "is a true hollow body. It has a light pine fluted block that's about a five eighths of an inch in depth attached to the back of the body but there's an actual space between that and the top of about three quarters of an inch so that the fluted block there dampens it enough to keep it from feeding back but it still has an acoustic quality".
*Also, IIRC - and I admit I might not - some owners here have confirmed these construction details; in case Casady is referring to the original in the above description, it at least confirms the latter's semi-hollow nature; I do believe this is also the case for the Epi model, but I'm not sure about what differences, if any, are there construction-wise between the two.
Oh, ok, so the block is sort of L-shaped (when seen/imagined from the side) and does touch the top starting from the bridge area, is that right? (Or, alternatively, it's detached from it also behind the bridge and shaped somewhat like this guy:I don't know what I'd call it, it's not a traditional semihollow or full hollow, because of that reinforcement running along the back - the top isn't "carrying" the string tension like it is on a full hollow. But it's certainly way "more hollow" than a traditional semihollow (which are solid all the way from the neck to the bridge, with hollows only on the side). With the Jack, most of the top, except for the bridge area itself, is free floating to vibrate.
Yeah, it's almost "shallow U shaped, I think - in that it connects all the way from the neck base block to the bridge block along the back. It can't be a true full hollowbody with a post bridge, of course, those studs have to go into something solid. Most true full hollows have floating bridges that fall off when you take the strings off, like an archtop jazz guitar or classical strings.Oh, ok, so the block is sort of L-shaped (when seen/imagined from the side) and does touch the top starting from the bridge area, is that right? (Or, alternatively, it's detached from it also behind the bridge and shaped somewhat like this guy:
"˨".)
Yeah, I'd call it near-hollow or something like that. Do you (guys) know if there are differences between the original LP signature and the JC in this respect?
I can't decide, I love every bass in this thread so far, and just about every hollow I've seen. Something about that big round tone gets me, and of course they're beautiful.
What do you think of the Dean Cabbie, pilgrim? I've always thought the styling on those was sooooo cool, but have never heard/played one
I'd call it hollow because ALL acoustic instruments have stuff inside. The block is acting as an acoustic "buffer" increasing the air pressure (when vibrating) beneath the bridge but not supporting it or causing it to not resonate - it's akin to putting one of those gummy things drummers use nowadays for mutes on the top - it remains an acoustic instrument, just with a bit of resonance damping - like any good acoustic instrument (or speaker cabinet).I don't know what I'd call it, it's not a traditional semihollow or full hollow, because of that reinforcement running along the back - the top isn't "carrying" the string tension like it is on a full hollow. But it's certainly way "more hollow" than a traditional semihollow (which are solid all the way from the neck to the bridge, with hollows only on the side). With the Jack, most of the top, except for the bridge area itself, is free floating to vibrate.
I love my Cabbie, I have the same bass without the paint job in a teal color as well. Someone on here put some TV Jones pickups in theirs, sounded huge.I can't decide, I love every bass in this thread so far, and just about every hollow I've seen. Something about that big round tone gets me, and of course they're beautiful.
What do you think of the Dean Cabbie, pilgrim? I've always thought the styling on those was sooooo cool, but have never heard/played one
A drummer friend of mine uses Maxi Pads An old roommate of his always got freebies in the mail so she gave them to him. Worked a charm....it's akin to putting one of those........things drummers use nowadays for mutes on the top - it remains an acoustic instrument, just with a bit of resonance damping
Yes I did, and yes it does.I love my Cabbie, I have the same bass without the paint job in a teal color as well. Someone on here put some TV Jones pickups in theirs, sounded huge.
Love it! Couldn't remember who had it, didn't go searching. That's the color I have, and I have the TV Jones, but they're for another project....Yes I did, and yes it does.
![]()