Would you do it without the vocoder/whatever vocal effect?
Assume a band with a wide variety of covers, or a band that does such material...
Effect starts 2:20
We did this song in a previous project that broke up before playing out. We sounded GREAT (and my bassline was way funkier).
Now we don't have that keyboard (it wasn't mine) that provides that vocoder/whatever vocal effect (the ones I provide aren't as elaborate), and I don't want to purchase anything that would provide it, as it would be imo too costly for one song.
Singer just won't cooperate, insists that it's just not right without it.
I told him "Do you really think the dancers would flee the dance floor in disgust when that part of the song came up and there was no vocoder effect?"
I'm not winning the argument
, so I'm just wondering what y'all think... who's right?
Now understand that the opinions here won't likely change his mind, but if it's positive enough in my favor, I might just show it to him.
Thanks in advance for your opinions.
Assume a band with a wide variety of covers, or a band that does such material...
Effect starts 2:20
We did this song in a previous project that broke up before playing out. We sounded GREAT (and my bassline was way funkier).
Now we don't have that keyboard (it wasn't mine) that provides that vocoder/whatever vocal effect (the ones I provide aren't as elaborate), and I don't want to purchase anything that would provide it, as it would be imo too costly for one song.
Singer just won't cooperate, insists that it's just not right without it.
I told him "Do you really think the dancers would flee the dance floor in disgust when that part of the song came up and there was no vocoder effect?"
I'm not winning the argument
Now understand that the opinions here won't likely change his mind, but if it's positive enough in my favor, I might just show it to him.
Thanks in advance for your opinions.
Last edited:
