It survived, here it can be seen with Alexander in 1972.
Yes, Jeff (Dunn) figured that out later as well.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
It survived, here it can be seen with Alexander in 1972.
I’ve owned 2 gold / slab 59’s. One had a 3/59 body and a serial number of 43xxx. The other doesn’t have a body date that I can find. Serial number is 37xxxI have a gold guard/ slab body 4/59 serial # 37xxx
Here’s my 1/59 p. All the dates in the body, pots, and neck plate date the bass to 1958. But I guess because the neck is jan 59, then the bass is a 59.
I had a reissue didnt like it
Same here !I tried a Custom Shop "59" reissue. Didn't sound or feel much at all like the real thing...
Why do you think that is? I can only think of two things that would make that happen. Wood tone (Brazilian rosewood) and just age?I tried a Custom Shop "59" reissue. Didn't sound or feel much at all like the real thing...
Maybe the density of wood was different back then, especially if they were from slow growing trees found in nature.Why do you think that is? I can only think of two things that would make that happen. Wood tone (Brazilian rosewood) and just age?
Why do you think that is? I can only think of two things that would make that happen. Wood tone (Brazilian rosewood) and just age?
I believe fender never bothered to match the neck of a 59 slab or 58-59 maple. I think they made them all the same. Regardless if you get a custom shop 63, 62, 59, 58. They may have all the same neck shape? My 1959 slab is very thin. still the wide 1.75 nut but way thinner than my 1964 precision. That one has a full baseball bat neck. The cool thing about my 64 is i never had to adjust the neck. And its clear that the neck was never removed when i bought it 25 years ago. So extremely stable. To be fair, i only did micro adjustment on my 59. Maybe a 1/16 of a turn a couple time. So very stable as well. But i have no issue at all putting Jamerson labella 52-110 on the 64. It doesn;t even move at all. Its set in sone. The 59 however i don;t dare to put those on. I use the 43-104 on it.For me the main thing was the feel of the neck but also just that the tone was brighter and not as full.
I believe 1959 is correct.Do Google research on pre-CBS P Basses. My poor memory is saying that 1958 was the transactional year for 3 tone and rosewood. I'm sure that TBers will chime in.
The neck plate serial #s are meaningless because those serials and plates were also used on Telecasters and Strats.
Good luck.
58 is the transition to 3 tone sunburst. 59 is the transition from anodized pickguard to tortoise and rosewood fretboard.I believe 1959 is correct.
Do you have a thickness measurement at frets 1 and 12 on your 59 slab neck?I believe fender never bothered to match the neck of a 59 slab or 58-59 maple. I think they made them all the same. Regardless if you get a custom shop 63, 62, 59, 58. They may have all the same neck shape? My 1959 slab is very thin. still the wide 1.75 nut but way thinner than my 1964 precision. That one has a full baseball bat neck. The cool thing about my 64 is i never had to adjust the neck. And its clear that the neck was never removed when i bought it 25 years ago. So extremely stable. To be fair, i only did micro adjustment on my 59. Maybe a 1/16 of a turn a couple time. So very stable as well. But i have no issue at all putting Jamerson labella 52-110 on the 64. It doesn;t even move at all. Its set in sone. The 59 however i don;t dare to put those on. I use the 43-104 on it.
Your B-15 looks like my former '65 with the stock JBL.I believe fender never bothered to match the neck of a 59 slab or 58-59 maple. I think they made them all the same. Regardless if you get a custom shop 63, 62, 59, 58. They may have all the same neck shape? My 1959 slab is very thin. still the wide 1.75 nut but way thinner than my 1964 precision. That one has a full baseball bat neck. The cool thing about my 64 is i never had to adjust the neck. And its clear that the neck was never removed when i bought it 25 years ago. So extremely stable. To be fair, i only did micro adjustment on my 59. Maybe a 1/16 of a turn a couple time. So very stable as well. But i have no issue at all putting Jamerson labella 52-110 on the 64. It doesn;t even move at all. Its set in sone. The 59 however i don;t dare to put those on. I use the 43-104 on it.