• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

35" scale length + Fretless + You = ?

I have large-ish hands, so 35" + Fretless + me = A OK. The ability to lower your action further without buzz more than makes up for the added difficulty of intonation.

However, I'll have my cake and eat it too: my six-string fretless is a faux 36" scale. It has an extender after the bridge which basically gives it the same taughtness (and ridiculously low action) as a 36", but on a 34" scale neck.
 
Swimming Bird said:
However, I'll have my cake and eat it too: my six-string fretless is a faux 36" scale. It has an extender after the bridge which basically gives it the same taughtness (and ridiculously low action) as a 36", but on a 34" scale neck.

Anything after the breaking point of the nut or bridge has absolutely no affect on tension. It may change the perceived "feel" of the string, but it is no more taught.
 
Swimming Bird said:
I have large-ish hands, so 35" + Fretless + me = A OK. The ability to lower your action further without buzz more than makes up for the added difficulty of intonation.

I've got large hands too. When people say they like short scale basses, people instantly assume you have small hands. I mean, I'm no stanley Clarke, it's jsut the tension the 35" sale basses produces that I hate!
 
I've been playing 34" scale too long I guess. I have a Lakland 55-02 fretless that I rarely play because I don't like the 35" scale. I find when reading tunes I have to pay attention, with 34" I'm on auto pilot. I don't want to think about the adjustment while playing. I would like to try an F Bass fretless to see how the 34.5" scale is. They sure have a sweet sound from what I've heard.