TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Yes.
A nut replacement isn't always necessary, but if you decide you don't want to go back to a low B, it would probably be a good idea, for proper intonation and setup purposes. I have had a few basses set up this way, and plan to do so again in the not so distant future.
-Grady
what did you think? you have to replace the nut? etc.... details![]()
(But that's another thread.)Nope. I just play a 6-string and an 8-string. Looks manlier in my hands anyway.
I hear ya! And for many things that works. But for me, I was using my Carvin AC50 for blues because all the Blues Nazis got all over my case for bringing a 6 string. At first I wanted the extended upper range for solos. So I strung it EADGC and it worked out wonderfully. I didn't even bother to get a new nut. But after some time, I decided to sacrifice some of the solo stuff for the ease of whiling away the hours with the convenience of the 5 string Low B and I put it back to normal 5 string. And that is where it is for now. But if I really wanted to show some class with solos I'd have no reluctance to put the high C back on. The extended high range with 24 fret neck really does it for showing off and yet still maintains a trad look from the audience.