The 2 Pro also is all-tube.Whoops didnt realize he was talking about the non-pro. I forgot about those there's not too many around.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
The 2 Pro also is all-tube.Whoops didnt realize he was talking about the non-pro. I forgot about those there's not too many around.
Well the good thing is that there's no bad decision.Hey guys, thank you all for all the info and opinions! Buy them both seems the way to go . Unfortunately my wallet disagrees. Some people tried talking me out of getting an all-tube amp and that's not going to happen. Sure amps like Markbass are great, they really are, but that's not what I'm looking for. There's something to an all-tuber that you just cannot get from a SS or hybrid. It's like the slogan from Harley-Davidson: "If I have to explain, you wouldn't understand". And I already own a hybrid (Genz Benz Streamliner 900). My dilemma has sorted itself out. The SVT II is sold . Guess I'm going to get the V-4B then. BTW, I think I was going to get it anyway even if the SVT II was still available... Or I could always get an SVT CL or Heritage . Doh!
KN,Howdy folks,
I want to get an all-tube amp again and kinda had my mind set on the Ampeg V-4B. However, I accidently stumbled upon a used SVT-II (non-pro) that looks really interesting. Now I don't know which one to get. I play mostly in bars and small clubs (<100 seats) and I wonder if the SVT-II may be a little overkill. Also, how do they compare in sound? I plan to use it for classic rock/funk. The SVT-II would probably be very clean because I can't really crank it up. I do have a Darkglass Vintage Tubes and COG Pedals Fuzz (on the way) for the dirt. The cabs I use are Bergantino's (HT112 and HT112ER). Maybe I'll switch to an Ampeg cab also (later). I play passive Fender basses. So my question is, which amp would you pick and why? Thanks for the advice.
KN
Try the Ampeg BA-210v2. It is 450 watts and designed like a monitor that fires at you at a 60 degree angle like a floor wedge. If you need more volume just add another cab and the amp switches from 350 to 450 watts to give you the needed juice. It has all of the classic Ampeg tones and controls and you don't have to hire a road crew to move it for every gig. It will fill any club or medium stage. If you need more than that run it through the pa system. It really changed things for me in a positive way. It might for you too, since you seem to like that sound a lot, as do I. Good luck!Howdy folks,
I play mostly in bars and small clubs (<100 seats) and I wonder if the SVT-II may be a little overkill. Also, how do they compare in sound? I plan to use it for classic rock/funk. The SVT-II would probably be very clean because I can't really crank it up. I do have a Darkglass Vintage Tubes and COG Pedals Fuzz (on the way) for the dirt. The cabs I use are Bergantino's (HT112 and HT112ER). Maybe I'll switch to an Ampeg cab also (later). I play passive Fender basses. So my question is, which amp would you pick and why? Thanks for the advice.
KN
Hi First off I have a killer MusicMan Stingry bass. Killer... I had a V4B head. it was huge and heavy but it sounded beautiful. it was too heavy so I sold it :-( I got an Acoustic 450 head and a 15" cabinet an got most of that classic Acoustic sound with plenty of power. Even though solid state it is musical and not so heavy. But have been pondering either an Ampeg or Mesa Boogie pre-amp pedal and then can marry those good EQs and versatility to a power amp and either 2x10 or 1 15 cabinet. Super versatile especially for recording and light enough to get up and down on stairs. But if you have roadies load up with the SVT and 8x10 cabinets to make them sweat. Remember Tone is King!Howdy folks,
I want to get an all-tube amp again and kinda had my mind set on the Ampeg V-4B. However, I accidently stumbled upon a used SVT-II (non-pro) that looks really interesting. Now I don't know which one to get. I play mostly in bars and small clubs (<100 seats) and I wonder if the SVT-II may be a little overkill. Also, how do they compare in sound? I plan to use it for classic rock/funk. The SVT-II would probably be very clean because I can't really crank it up. I do have a Darkglass Vintage Tubes and COG Pedals Fuzz (on the way) for the dirt. The cabs I use are Bergantino's (HT112 and HT112ER). Maybe I'll switch to an Ampeg cab also (later). I play passive Fender basses. So my question is, which amp would you pick and why? Thanks for the advice.
KN
Had a SVT(unknown age)w/810 cab in the early 80s. Loved it,BUT-it was put on stage and 50 weeks later taken off for 2 week vacation, then put back for 50 more weeks twice until gig(hotel in Miami Beach)petered out. Now doing one nighters in small venues using a Rumble 200-and my same old 1967 NR Tbird. As Slim Pickens said in Blazing Saddles:"I'm gettin' too old for this (stuff)".Because it's a classic. Had one, loved every inch of it! Except when transporting of course ;-)
Hello to you. I have been a paid bass player for 50 years. Just retired, after 36 years from being a self employed large boat mechanic, both electrical and mechanical.
I have a 1971 SVT w/810e cabinet. I rebuilt the 1971 head with new power supply caps and a few out of spec resistors. 6 months ago a friend bought just the head from me, leaving me with only the 810e cab.
I am also an audiophile, and much prefer tubes to transistors.
All that being said, I have been again gigging with the Ampeg 810e cabinet and am using my healthy Gallien Krueger 800rb head. I much prefer the sound of this cabinet with the solid state GK head.
Punch, detail, and headroom (very important) are better with a solid state amp.
There is a spec for amplifiers called the "damping factor".
What that means is that the speaker, with a vibrating voice coil, around a magnet structure, will generate back voltage.
Tube amplifiers don't do well with this back voltage, and have a damping factor of about 15-30.
A well designed solid state amplifier will have a damping factor of 80-150, or more.
This means that the solid state amplifier will "control" the cones much better than the tube unit.
I have tried many solid state and tube amps, and the GK 800rb has the best sound, to my ears. It is warm, punchy, and gets the harmonics right.
You can try an Ampeg V-4B, but I am quite sure you won't like the fact that your will quickly run out of headroom.
To gain 3 db of sound level, you have to double your power.
Best luck with your amp endevours.
Bruce, on the coast of South Carolina
Hello to you. I have been a paid bass player for 50 years. Just retired, after 36 years from being a self employed large boat mechanic, both electrical and mechanical.
I have a 1971 SVT w/810e cabinet. I rebuilt the 1971 head with new power supply caps and a few out of spec resistors. 6 months ago a friend bought just the head from me, leaving me with only the 810e cab.
I am also an audiophile, and much prefer tubes to transistors.
All that being said, I have been again gigging with the Ampeg 810e cabinet and am using my healthy Gallien Krueger 800rb head. I much prefer the sound of this cabinet with the solid state GK head.
Punch, detail, and headroom (very important) are better with a solid state amp.
There is a spec for amplifiers called the "damping factor".
What that means is that the speaker, with a vibrating voice coil, around a magnet structure, will generate back voltage.
Tube amplifiers don't do well with this back voltage, and have a damping factor of about 15-30.
A well designed solid state amplifier will have a damping factor of 80-150, or more.
This means that the solid state amplifier will "control" the cones much better than the tube unit.
I have tried many solid state and tube amps, and the GK 800rb has the best sound, to my ears. It is warm, punchy, and gets the harmonics right.
You can try an Ampeg V-4B, but I am quite sure you won't like the fact that your will quickly run out of headroom.
To gain 3 db of sound level, you have to double your power.
Best luck with your amp endevours.
Bruce, on the coast of South Carolina
Hey guys, thank you all for all the info and opinions! Buy them both seems the way to go . Unfortunately my wallet disagrees. Some people tried talking me out of getting an all-tube amp and that's not going to happen. Sure amps like Markbass are great, they really are, but that's not what I'm looking for. There's something to an all-tuber that you just cannot get from a SS or hybrid. It's like the slogan from Harley-Davidson: "If I have to explain, you wouldn't understand". And I already own a hybrid (Genz Benz Streamliner 900). My dilemma has sorted itself out. The SVT II is sold . Guess I'm going to get the V-4B then. BTW, I think I was going to get it anyway even if the SVT II was still available... Or I could always get an SVT CL or Heritage . Doh!
Huh? Where does that one come from? The original cab made for the V4B was a 215 horn loaded cab!I just hope you don't regret having the lack of headroom and all its causal effects as I and a few other posters have pointed out. No doubt the V4B is a nice amp and does sound good, but mark my words, you will run into situations where you will wonder why it's not sounding right--and 9 times out of 10 it will be needing more headroom in the amp. Just make sure to stay away from running anything larger than 12's.
Howdy folks,
I want to get an all-tube amp again and kinda had my mind set on the Ampeg V-4B. However, I accidently stumbled upon a used SVT-II (non-pro) that looks really interesting. Now I don't know which one to get. I play mostly in bars and small clubs (<100 seats) and I wonder if the SVT-II may be a little overkill. Also, how do they compare in sound? I plan to use it for classic rock/funk. The SVT-II would probably be very clean because I can't really crank it up. I do have a Darkglass Vintage Tubes and COG Pedals Fuzz (on the way) for the dirt. The cabs I use are Bergantino's (HT112 and HT112ER). Maybe I'll switch to an Ampeg cab also (later). I play passive Fender basses. So my question is, which amp would you pick and why? Thanks for the advice.
KN
I bought the SVT II (np) the first year it came out. (Along with the SVR 215 Isobaric speakers & built in 4 rack space)..To this day it is my only amp for jamming and gigs..drummers love the rear firing speaker..I can't comment on the other amp you are considering,but I can highly recommend the SVT II .Howdy folks,
I want to get an all-tube amp again and kinda had my mind set on the Ampeg V-4B. However, I accidently stumbled upon a used SVT-II (non-pro) that looks really interesting. Now I don't know which one to get. I play mostly in bars and small clubs (<100 seats) and I wonder if the SVT-II may be a little overkill. Also, how do they compare in sound? I plan to use it for classic rock/funk. The SVT-II would probably be very clean because I can't really crank it up. I do have a Darkglass Vintage Tubes and COG Pedals Fuzz (on the way) for the dirt. The cabs I use are Bergantino's (HT112 and HT112ER). Maybe I'll switch to an Ampeg cab also (later). I play passive Fender basses. So my question is, which amp would you pick and why? Thanks for the advice.
KN
I can give advice on the V4b as I used them when they were 1st introduced and I can tell you this much. Although I can't speak for 12's don't get this and push 15's with it. It is woefully lacking in every area that 300 watt tubes don't even grunt to do. I immediately traded my V4b for a classic SVT in the 70's and drove a combo of single 12", 2-15's and a 18"" cab. Huge difference. Playing hard rock and funk--blew the doors off everywhere I played. Talk about bone rattling bass. The V4b couldn't even do a decent job on 2-15's. And my guess is the same would apply to 12's. The answer in a nutshell--it's headroom. Deep low gut punching bass loves headroom in amplification. Some believe this does not apply to tubes, but it does, and the bigger the speaker the more critical it is. I'm not an audio engineer, but I think it has something to do with energy required to move larger voice coil's. Your never going to worry about having to drive anything with 300 watts of tube power.
Hmmm...in what ways are the new ones "junk"? Because my older Heritage SVT-CL has had not a single problem in over 4 years, even with tubes, and it sounds identical to the normal channel 1 in my 69 SVT. So I'm curious where the "junk" part comes in.I would have to agree 100% with Mike here. I've been there done that. Just can't go back to a V4B after hearing and feeling the SVT. I have a1987 Reissue limited Edition. I've had it rebuilt a few years ago. Still better than the junk coming out today, but then again I swapped in for much better parts than even when mine was new. It was about 1500 in parts and 700 labor.
if it sounds identical to your 69 SVT, then you and i are hearing different tones......I should have made it clear that the build quality isn't junk... The tone on the CL was a bit thin and crunchy. Now i think the Heritage SVT tone is considerably better and more towards my SVT sound. I would recommend that one. Do you think the Heritage and the CL sound the same? I'm curious...Tone on my SVT is very clean, round and punchy. Like I said, the parts upgrade on mine puts it into an Audiophile level of performance.Hmmm...in what ways are the new ones "junk"? Because my older Heritage SVT-CL has had not a single problem in over 4 years, even with tubes, and it sounds identical to the normal channel 1 in my 69 SVT. So I'm curious where the "junk" part comes in.
The Heritage IS a CL. Do they sound identical to the regular CL? They can, yes, but that's more a function of the tubes than the build. At any rate, I'm happy you're getting what you want out of yours. To me, there's no such thing as a bad SVT as long as it works.if it sounds identical to your 69 SVT, then you and i are hearing different tones......I should have made it clear that the build quality isn't junk... The tone on the CL was a bit thin and crunchy. Now i think the Heritage SVT tone is considerably better and more towards my SVT sound. I would recommend that one. Do you think the Heritage and the CL sound the same? I'm curious...Tone on my SVT is very clean, round and punchy. Like I said, the parts upgrade on mine puts it into an Audiophile level of performance.