so, I've been in this band for about a third of it's existence, founded by two cousins, guitarists.
At one point it was a singer who played bass/keys, two guitarists (who sang a bit), and a drummer.
The most long standing lineup has been virtuoso lead singer (no other instrument), two guitarists (sing more than they used to), bassist (me, I sing lead and harmony), and drummer.
So, a 5 piece.
One of the founding cousins has been jamming with a keyboard player he really wants to try out with us. I guess this keyboard player learned a bunch of our material and is one of his close friends.
As far as the idea of having a keyboard sound in our band, that's really not an issue for me. It might be a tight squeeze on some of our stages, but I certainly don't object. I don't see it being a huge value add, but I don't object. And I'm sure he's good... the member in question has a good ear.
What I do object to is a 5 way split becoming a 6 way split when it comes to finances.
Despite having a reputation of one of the better, if not best, cover bands in the area, it's been really hard to get compensated fairly lately. I'm not gonna use exact numbers because I'm sure we do better than some people but really, a 3 hour gig is 5-6 hours of work and the more it gets divided up the less feasible it is, especially factoring in travel.
The thing is, I know I'm not the only one in the band who feels this way, but I don't want to go having a bunch of private conversations with band members to gang up about it, and I also don't feel qualified to be the big stick in the mud about it, but I don't know if I can afford dedicating as much time to the band as I do if the money keeps going down.
Part of me hopes it will just work itself out... we'll jam, realize it's impractical, and move forward...I suggested we jam with him and reserve him for things like weddings but the more I talk to the founder/cousin about it, the more it seems like he really wants to bring him on and also feels a personal loyalty to him.
What the heck do I do? We all really get along well and are pretty democratic about it all.
At one point it was a singer who played bass/keys, two guitarists (who sang a bit), and a drummer.
The most long standing lineup has been virtuoso lead singer (no other instrument), two guitarists (sing more than they used to), bassist (me, I sing lead and harmony), and drummer.
So, a 5 piece.
One of the founding cousins has been jamming with a keyboard player he really wants to try out with us. I guess this keyboard player learned a bunch of our material and is one of his close friends.
As far as the idea of having a keyboard sound in our band, that's really not an issue for me. It might be a tight squeeze on some of our stages, but I certainly don't object. I don't see it being a huge value add, but I don't object. And I'm sure he's good... the member in question has a good ear.
What I do object to is a 5 way split becoming a 6 way split when it comes to finances.
Despite having a reputation of one of the better, if not best, cover bands in the area, it's been really hard to get compensated fairly lately. I'm not gonna use exact numbers because I'm sure we do better than some people but really, a 3 hour gig is 5-6 hours of work and the more it gets divided up the less feasible it is, especially factoring in travel.
The thing is, I know I'm not the only one in the band who feels this way, but I don't want to go having a bunch of private conversations with band members to gang up about it, and I also don't feel qualified to be the big stick in the mud about it, but I don't know if I can afford dedicating as much time to the band as I do if the money keeps going down.
Part of me hopes it will just work itself out... we'll jam, realize it's impractical, and move forward...I suggested we jam with him and reserve him for things like weddings but the more I talk to the founder/cousin about it, the more it seems like he really wants to bring him on and also feels a personal loyalty to him.
What the heck do I do? We all really get along well and are pretty democratic about it all.