The first professional recording studio I ever worked in, way back in 1976, had an Acoustic 370/301 rig as their house bass amp.
Everything I have subsequently learned about A) that Acoustic 370/301 combination, B) recording bass, and C) small room acoustics, suggests that it should have been the wrong tool for the job, either completely inappropriate or, at the very least, complete overkill.
And yet, when I listen back to the tapes we made in those sessions, I cannot deny that my bass sound is infinitely better than anything I was ever able to get from the much smaller, more modest amps I used at the time. Huge, deep, thick & phat tones from a dinky POS Korean copy of a short-scale Hofner Beatle Bass. The 301 cab was close-mic'd with an AKG D12 iirc.
So if your bedroom can accomodate one -- and your neighbors can tolerate it -- I say knock yourself out.
Everything I have subsequently learned about A) that Acoustic 370/301 combination, B) recording bass, and C) small room acoustics, suggests that it should have been the wrong tool for the job, either completely inappropriate or, at the very least, complete overkill.
And yet, when I listen back to the tapes we made in those sessions, I cannot deny that my bass sound is infinitely better than anything I was ever able to get from the much smaller, more modest amps I used at the time. Huge, deep, thick & phat tones from a dinky POS Korean copy of a short-scale Hofner Beatle Bass. The 301 cab was close-mic'd with an AKG D12 iirc.
So if your bedroom can accomodate one -- and your neighbors can tolerate it -- I say knock yourself out.
Last edited: