• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

ADA GCS-3, Just picked one up.

My ADA GCS-3 just arrived yesterday!!
I am always looking for a new DI box as I play without an amp most of the time.
My main setup currently is a ToneHammer. Love it but the AGS sucks. (also have a sansamp BDI, Eden DI Behringer BDI).
Played around with it for a bit yesterday and I am very impressed with the sound.
One of the main reasons I wanted the GCS-3 over the GCS-2 is the headphone out. Also got a smoking deal, I got the GCS-3 for the same price that the GCS-2 sells for.
 
Any chance you have some clips or know where I can find some? I'm thinking about trying the same thing with my pedalboard for a direct rig. Does it retain the bass frequencies? Have you tried it with a five-string? Thanks.
 
I haven't heard or read any more about using a GCS-2 or 3 with or without a five string either. I'm considering ordering one from Amazon tonight to try it out and send it back if it does not sound good or their is low end loss.
 
I haven't heard or read any more about using a GCS-2 or 3 with or without a five string either. I'm considering ordering one from Amazon tonight to try it out and send it back if it does not sound good or their is low end loss.
read on another thread about someone else liking the AMT CN-1 better.
anyone else out there with experience with both? mostly wondering which one can be dialed in to retain more bass when utilized.
 
read on another thread about someone else liking the AMT CN-1 better.
anyone else out there with experience with both? mostly wondering which one can be dialed in to retain more bass when utilized.

I actually wrote both AMT and Mooer (regarding their "Tres Cab") and both wrote back stating they were designed for guitar and did not recommend using either of them for bass. But I know I've read on here at least once that someone has liked the results they got with both the ADA GCS-2 and the AMT Chameleon Cab. I don't remember if I ever wrote ADA or not.
 
Hey - Like I said in another thread I'm using a GCS-3 as my bedroom rig and I'm quite happy with it.
Not all settings work with bass but it's easy to dial in those that do. They nailed the balance between versatility and ease of use with 1 knob and 4 switches.

I don't have any samples with a 5-string yet (it does work well).
Here's what I have :

Dingwall Super Jazz (some bits in drop D) through ADA guitar preamp (which unlike the cab simulator isn't very bass-friendly)


Warwick-like Fame Baphomet tuned down to C# through Darkglass Vintage Deluxe
 
Excellent, thanks. I do remember seeing that Dingwall clip in another thread. I know this question has been asked in multiple forums. It's hard to remember who posted what and piece together the right answer. : )
 
FWIW, I got a bunch of new toys in the mail a couple of days ago to try out: Sadowsky preamp pedal, Aguilar Tone Hammer DI, Palmer PDI-09, Radial Pro48 (to try with my Tech 21 Blonde), and the ADA GCS-2. After fiddling with all of those pedals/preamps/direct boxes, running the Blonde into them, the Darkglass VMT and the Blonde into them, or just the VMT, here are my thoughts:

If you're running direct with no amp and don't have something that already has a speaker sim built in like the Tech 21 line, and you're using any kind of drive in your chain, you should most definitely pick up an ADA GCS-2 (or GCS-3 if you need the extra features). I ran the Blonde into it, bypassing the Blonde's speaker sim, and with grit it made a huge difference. It took out most of the harshness and definitely made it sound "speaker-ish." It's also a great DI and substantially boosts your signal to line level (switchable to a mic level signal too). It is a pretty flexible box with its different tone-shaping options, but there was really only one setting that sounded reasonably good on bass. It was Modern-12"-Sealed, with the mic placement tailored to taste. It didn't really color the tone much more than the Blonde already did, with the exception of a little mid-range bump. The "vintage" setting added a significant amount of hiss, so much so to make it unusable. The other options just didn't sound good. It did work well on the 5-string as well. I didn't notice any substantial low-end loss through my headphones and monitoring preamp. Ultimately, though, I decided it was really unnecessary. I can't say that it sounded any better than the Blonde's speaker sim. Just different. When I ran it without the Blonde, though, and just ran the VMT into it, it made a huuuuge difference. But that's not how I'd use it. If I had nothing but money sitting around I might buy one just to have it as an option, but it's not necessary since the Blonde has a speaker sim that is more than adequate for playing live with no amp.

On a side note, the Palmer PDI-09 seemed to do nothing much at all. I really didn't see the point. It cut the signal level pretty substantially due to its being a passive direct box. And I didn't feel that it sounded much like a speaker box. The difference between "mellow" and "normal" was fairly indistinguishable as well. Granted, it's designed as a guitar box, and it's supposed to run between an amp and cabinet not at the end of a pedal board. But the Palmer guys did tell me that I could use it at the end of a passive pedalboard. It just didn’t do anything for me. I was surprisingly disappointed. Maybe it would sound good if I was running it between my amp head and cabinet, but I don’t need it for that purpose, and I didn’t try it.

I ultimately decided to go with the Aguilar Tone Hammer in AGS mode. I tried it today at church for the first time and it absolutely killed! The Aguilar is so solid. It just gives every note I play real authority and makes it stand out. And it sounds great with the VMT as well. Very old school tubey. And if I bypass the AGS I can get a great pristine studio sound as well. I’m very happy with it. The Sadowsky sounded great too, and I love its mute option with tuner out, but mids are pretty important to me, and I opted for the Aguilar’s sweepable mid control.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HAtti