In my 30 years of getting paid to gig I've never one bothered with the IRS. From 2008-2012 I probably cleared 8k+ a year from gigs. All cash, never reported.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Save all your receipts for gear, travel, meals, mileage etc. If your share for the year is under 600 you don’t need to claim it. add a small business form to your W2 stating income and expenses Duke
If a bar pays in cash, how will the IRS - or anyone - know to whom the cash was paid? Most of the bars don’t even even ask for a signature on a receipt, they just hand over the cash…
Yeah, I guess it is just a matter of one word over another. All's I know is there is nothing to be gained by getting on the wrong side of the IRS or ASCAP/BMI. It can't be worth the pain.


You are correct sir. Keeping all income and expenditure records is the best course of action.By law, you're required to claim all income, regardless of the "$600 rule".
The $600 rule only applies if you PAY a contractor; ie another musician, less than $600 a year, and only relieves you of having to send out a 1099.
But you still want to keep track of that payment just like any other expense - I received a 2023 1099 from one venue for $6,000 since I was the one taking and distributing payments over a 10 month period. Not keen to pay taxes on others' income, I sent a 1099 to those whose annual payments totalled $600 or more. Everyone else is still shown as an expense on my income statement, which is auditable by the IRS, along with electronic banking records of Zele and Venmo transactions.
Back to the IRS requirement to claim all income, the IRS has full access to these same digital banking records; If a band leader Venmos you $599, you'd best claim it as income.
The IRS "boogieman" is far worse in myth than in reality. Many returns never get audited and very few are touched by human hands. The industry creates some of the myth in order to drive up business.
...
The idea of rotating the person who manages the tax forms, gig by gig, is an EXCEPTIONALLY BAD AND BONEHEADED idea. It's tough enough for ONE person to get this stuff right for 10-12 gigs a year. Having four people each do it two to three times a year is a recipe for foul-ups, plus of course some of them are likely to be the kind of non-detail-oriented people who show up to HR Block on April 14th at 4:30 pm with a shoebox full of paper.
...
No need to form an LLC or anything like that.
IME non-reporting seems all fine & easy to get away with... until it isn't. I have a close family member who is in a huge, tangled legal & financial mess with multiple federal and state agencies, mostly from not telling them about stuff she should have.
The idea of rotating the person who manages the tax forms, gig by gig, is an EXCEPTIONALLY BAD AND BONEHEADED idea. It's tough enough for ONE person to get this stuff right for 10-12 gigs a year. Having four people each do it two to three times a year is a recipe for foul-ups, plus of course some of them are likely to be the kind of non-detail-oriented people who show up to HR Block on April 14th at 4:30 pm with a shoebox full of paper.
Heck, I've had mistakes on tax forms and the handling of taxes come to me from BANKS with billions of dollars on deposit!
So who's going to be the person that has to chase each person in succession to do the tax stuff and do it right? Who's going to be quality control, overseeing each assigned rotation person's work, since it's all of you that'll be liable for wrong tax entries?
You'd be far better off compensating ONE band member for the trouble of managing tax forms. If that means he/she gets an extra share, I'd do that.
Unless, of course, everyone in the band is a tax accountant, in which case never mind and carry on.
Correct. I meant W-9.W-2 is for employees. You’d fill out a W-9 and the they’d send you a 1099 end of year.
Most businesses won’t send a 1099 unless they’re paying you more than $600.
I agree with this if the band is setup as a business entity, which I will never do again for a local or regional band. This may be subject for a different discussion, but IME it's been superfluous, adding cost and exposure.
OTOH, if I'm filing everything on my personal income statement, which I am, and treating everyone else whom I've paid as a contractor expense, which I do, there's no downside to different band members accepting pay for different gigs in their names and doing the same for anything they pay me.
This is actually the way it works for the local pickup and sideman scene here. I may be the BL on one gig, where one of the sidemen may a BL on another.

Doesn't this approach increase your net income, and in turn, your tax bracket? That total earned is regardless of 1099s you send out... At least I think so? Probably a good question for a CPA![]()
Net income is AFTER expenses. So no, your taxes wont be affected negatively by bringing in a lot of money as long as you have the expenses to offset it.Doesn't this approach increase your net income, and in turn, your tax bracket? That total earned is regardless of 1099s you send out... At least I think so? Probably a good question for a CPA![]()