• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

All things EMG active! (And yes, the 9 vs 18v too)

Hello fellow bassfolk🤟🤓

Ok soooooo, I am what I would consider a now long time devotee to EMG (multiple basses with EMG and also now over 30 basses converted) I have become a bit knowledgable about certain things so I would like to offer some help to those using/considering EMG and even some (dare I say it) personal opinions based on experinece and also create a bit if a “hub”.
I have now used every single piece of active gear (most multiple times over) EMG makes for bass in a wide variety of combinations, so here goes…..I will start with the 9v vs 18v thing and sharing my fave pickups and setup with EMG.
(Now, if you think its useful to tell me threads already exist covering any and all of these topics? Save your time, head over to another thread and share that wisdom with someone else.)

So the answer to the topic I have seen debated back and forth, does 18v make a difference? The answer is a resounding YES! Now let me clarify this, some pickups and setups the difference is more noticeable than with others however in every case the difference is there. And yes, it is head room, or maybe more easily explainable as enhanced or uncapped performance as far as someone who might not understand what headroom is.

One of my fave things is the EMG original P. I love it just on its own without any tone, just a volume, or with the BTC control set to the ON/ON position on the internal dip switches so the treble is not a treble it’s more a high mid boost at around 2.5k.

Anyway, so running this in either scenario with just a 9v is meaty and chunky and has those extended highs and lows we all love or hate from EMG. But the beast is chained, capped….when you dig in or slap or play with a bit of energy the “compressed” effect as most like to refer to it kicks in. It’s literally just the pre amp doing its best to produce the transients you are hitting it with but it just doesn’t have the juice or “head room” to do so. Now, one of my students plays very lightly, so with him I did the experiment of swapping from 9 to 18 also as a test and guess what? There was also a difference in the fundamental tone. So here come these magic words….colourful, open, untethered….even in this case the sound just got slightly richer, deeper, broader. It’s not a night and day scenario which is why some people still say they hear no difference but it is certainly discernible, no doubt.

As you strat to add other pickups in the circuit and start using pre amps and boosting and cutting it tends to also make a big difference in the “open” sense of the sound.

Now to address a few more things.
1: The X series
2: The sterile/compressed/scooped comments that EMG seem to get slugged with

1: I do not consider the X series at 9v to be the same as the classic at 18v. I must now add an opinion and matter of taste, I much prefer all the pickups in original format over the X series. It’s just my taste. Now, let’s talk the P pickup again. The X pickup on 9v does have the more “open” sound, not so “compressed” as the classic at 9v, which is similar to the classic at 18v however to my ears they are tonaly quite different and they are of lesser output. Oh, btw, another common misconception is adding the extra 9v makes the pickup louder or the batteries last longer….those are both false and untrue.

2: EMG pickups are all different, obviously, so let’s again look at the P but can be said for many of their offerings. I see lots of the scooped/sterile/compressed comments.
So one by one:
-Scooped: no, not the case. Yes, more treble and bass than many P bass pups on the market but the old idea, it’s easier to take away than add? You CAN make the P sound vintage by removing or EQ’ing out some of that bottom and treble, no issue. So in this case they are not scooped at all, more like “flat response”

-Sterile: well, again, in the case of the P, more accurate might be articulate and clear….that is for sure. Sterile is again a taste thing and I think a lot of the time a misdiagnosis of the clarity/articulation combined with the extra top end. But hey, that’s just my humble opinion. One persons sterile is another’s mess.

-Compressed: Yeah, as stated above at 9v you can hit a roof when it’s pushed, which makes it sound limited and the general colour of the note at 9v has everything feeling more tighter and compact, which lends a feeling of compression. This could actually be quite useful to some players, for others a nightmare. But yes, at 9v again just in my opinion, compressed is a very valid description. Hence I only run at 18v.

Now lastly, if anyone has any questions or observations? Go for it. I have tried so many things with my EMG gear I am sure I can either help with questions or offer an opinion if desired.

My favourite pickups and setups are as follows:

1: Just a classic P with a volume and 18v.

2: Ceramic J in the bridge and a PA or P in the neck with the BTC knob and ABC balance (I don’t like volume/volume setups)

3: Ceramic J bridge and DC neck with BTC and ABC.

4: Dual DC with BTC and ABC.
 
Hello fellow bassfolk🤟🤓

Ok soooooo, I am what I would consider a now long time devotee to EMG (multiple basses with EMG and also now over 30 basses converted) I have become a bit knowledgable about certain things so I would like to offer some help to those using/considering EMG and even some (dare I say it) personal opinions based on experinece and also create a bit if a “hub”.
I have now used every single piece of active gear (most multiple times over) EMG makes for bass in a wide variety of combinations, so here goes…..I will start with the 9v vs 18v thing and sharing my fave pickups and setup with EMG.
(Now, if you think its useful to tell me threads already exist covering any and all of these topics? Save your time, head over to another thread and share that wisdom with someone else.)

So the answer to the topic I have seen debated back and forth, does 18v make a difference? The answer is a resounding YES! Now let me clarify this, some pickups and setups the difference is more noticeable than with others however in every case the difference is there. And yes, it is head room, or maybe more easily explainable as enhanced or uncapped performance as far as someone who might not understand what headroom is.

One of my fave things is the EMG original P. I love it just on its own without any tone, just a volume, or with the BTC control set to the ON/ON position on the internal dip switches so the treble is not a treble it’s more a high mid boost at around 2.5k.

Anyway, so running this in either scenario with just a 9v is meaty and chunky and has those extended highs and lows we all love or hate from EMG. But the beast is chained, capped….when you dig in or slap or play with a bit of energy the “compressed” effect as most like to refer to it kicks in. It’s literally just the pre amp doing its best to produce the transients you are hitting it with but it just doesn’t have the juice or “head room” to do so. Now, one of my students plays very lightly, so with him I did the experiment of swapping from 9 to 18 also as a test and guess what? There was also a difference in the fundamental tone. So here come these magic words….colourful, open, untethered….even in this case the sound just got slightly richer, deeper, broader. It’s not a night and day scenario which is why some people still say they hear no difference but it is certainly discernible, no doubt.

As you strat to add other pickups in the circuit and start using pre amps and boosting and cutting it tends to also make a big difference in the “open” sense of the sound.

Now to address a few more things.
1: The X series
2: The sterile/compressed/scooped comments that EMG seem to get slugged with

1: I do not consider the X series at 9v to be the same as the classic at 18v. I must now add an opinion and matter of taste, I much prefer all the pickups in original format over the X series. It’s just my taste. Now, let’s talk the P pickup again. The X pickup on 9v does have the more “open” sound, not so “compressed” as the classic at 9v, which is similar to the classic at 18v however to my ears they are tonaly quite different and they are of lesser output. Oh, btw, another common misconception is adding the extra 9v makes the pickup louder or the batteries last longer….those are both false and untrue.

2: EMG pickups are all different, obviously, so let’s again look at the P but can be said for many of their offerings. I see lots of the scooped/sterile/compressed comments.
So one by one:
-Scooped: no, not the case. Yes, more treble and bass than many P bass pups on the market but the old idea, it’s easier to take away than add? You CAN make the P sound vintage by removing or EQ’ing out some of that bottom and treble, no issue. So in this case they are not scooped at all, more like “flat response”

-Sterile: well, again, in the case of the P, more accurate might be articulate and clear….that is for sure. Sterile is again a taste thing and I think a lot of the time a misdiagnosis of the clarity/articulation combined with the extra top end. But hey, that’s just my humble opinion. One persons sterile is another’s mess.

-Compressed: Yeah, as stated above at 9v you can hit a roof when it’s pushed, which makes it sound limited and the general colour of the note at 9v has everything feeling more tighter and compact, which lends a feeling of compression. This could actually be quite useful to some players, for others a nightmare. But yes, at 9v again just in my opinion, compressed is a very valid description. Hence I only run at 18v.

Now lastly, if anyone has any questions or observations? Go for it. I have tried so many things with my EMG gear I am sure I can either help with questions or offer an opinion if desired.

My favourite pickups and setups are as follows:

1: Just a classic P with a volume and 18v.

2: Ceramic J in the bridge and a PA or P in the neck with the BTC knob and ABC balance (I don’t like volume/volume setups)

3: Ceramic J bridge and DC neck with BTC and ABC.

4: Dual DC with BTC and ABC.

I own a couple basses with EMGs. They have 35-P4s in the neck position and 35-CSs in the bridge position. Each one has a B-30 EQ, as well. I tried them out at 18 volts and agree with your assessment. Definitely more headroom. These two basses, one fretted and one fretless, have been my benchmark for what I look for in modern bass tone. Absolutely love the EMGs in them.

Yesterday, I ordered a PJ set to put in another bass and I plan on a Volume/Blend/Tone setup for that one. I ordered a 25k ohm blend pot but it is not the EMG ABC. In your opinion, does the ABC make enough of a difference in performance compared to a standard blend pot to justify the huge difference in cost?
 
Hey buddy
You can get a pot from EMG that’s a 25k blend dual gang with centre indent without the op amps in it, it’s cheaper and is fine if you are committed to using active pickups with it. MEC also does one. I use the ABC primarily because once I decided on the EMG pre was going to be my pre in every bass I would just buy the BTC system which is a package with the BTC pre and the ABCx which ends up dropping the price of the blend a fair bit. I am in Europe though so it’s a bit more expensive for the EMG gear and some of the more “specialised” parts are not always readily available. I would not buy the ABC seperate, it’s too expensive on its own. Both the EMG and MEC are quality pots.And yes, the ABC that comes with the system is the X version, can be used with passive/original and x (with passive it becomes an active blend hence the op amps) The straight ABC that you can buy on its own doesn’t play as well with the X series.

My second big reason for going EMG across the board (first being I love the sound) was that I swap multiple basses during a gig and use lots of effects and swapping before between active and passive and old school and new school just meant a bit of a nightmare with output volume swings and effect performance. Having the same electronics everywhere allows the tone and feel of all the different basses to come through but the output etc is much more uniform and I can set my fuzzes and drives and various other effects up accordingly.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: in tune and Wasnex
Hi JobuDRK79 - thank you for sharing your Experiences.
Can you please help me to implement my following wiring idea?

I have 2 active J-Bass pickups, 2 volume potis, a passive EMG-tone pot and the EMG BTC control (on a stacked pot)
I want to switch between the passive tone and the BTC control (in the way like active / passive). Can I use the EMG Invalid Link Removed or the EMG push / pull volume poti so I can use everything solderless?
Thank you so much
best regards, Chris
 
Hi JobuDRK79 - thank you for sharing your Experiences.
Can you please help me to implement my following wiring idea?

I have 2 active J-Bass pickups, 2 volume potis, a passive EMG-tone pot and the EMG BTC control (on a stacked pot)
I want to switch between the passive tone and the BTC control (in the way like active / passive). Can I use the EMG Invalid Link Removed or the EMG push / pull volume poti so I can use everything solderless?
Thank you so much
best regards, Chris
Hey Chris, Firstly it’s all EMG? All the pots and the pickups?
And secondly why do you want to run a passive tone with the active BTC? Most commonly an active bass only has a passive tone for when you switch from active to passive so you still have a control over the tone (usually a high cut). EMG pickups are active so just want to understand why you would want to implement a passive hi cut in the circuit if the BTC does it all?

Thanks mate✊🤓
 
  • Like
Reactions: in tune
Do you know where I can find a wiring diagram for a EMG PJ set using one solderless volume, one solderless tone and a standard MN 25k ohm pot?
Hey mate, not specifically however if you just go on the EMG website and check out their BTC circuit setup diagram you would just use the 25k blend in place in the circuit where the abc is. I usually have the volume last before the output. Blend then tone then volume…..the order of knobs on the bass is different but that’s the order under the hood. Is it an EMG active blend you have? And solderless? Or it’s some other brand part?
 
Hey mate, not specifically however if you just go on the EMG website and check out their BTC circuit setup diagram you would just use the 25k blend in place in the circuit where the abc is. I usually have the volume last before the output. Blend then tone then volume…..the order of knobs on the bass is different but that’s the order under the hood. Is it an EMG active blend you have? And solderless? Or it’s some other brand part?

I actually got it sorted out tonight. I used an Alpha MN25k-ohm pot and soldered the pickup leads to the center lugs. Outputs tied together diagonally and I left the other, opposite lugs floating. Ended up with a blend that works smoothly across the range of sweep and no volume drop in the center position. If anything, it seems like the center position is actually a little bit louder than either pickup soloed. This is on a bass with older EMG soapbars; one P and one CS and all connections are soldered.

It is too late tonight to test it at louder levels but I'll post back if there are any issues.

FWIW, I ended up ordering an EMG ABC for another bass that has new EMG pickups with the solderless connection kit. It should arrive later this week. I'm interested to hear how it differs from the one I wired up tonight.
 
Nice one mate! Let me know how you rate the difference. I know for sure you will have a completely even volume across the blend sweep with the ABC, that’s for sure.

Thanks! I was able to test that new blend pot at higher volume today and I am very pleased. The center position doesn't lose volume and there is a wide range of adjustment on the blend pot. If I had known that it would be this easy and would work so well, I don't think I would have spent the money on the ABC. Oh well. Maybe I will add an EMG BTS or something down the road. At least it will be really simple to change things around since it has the solderless connections.

Thanks for your advice!
 
Hey man, thanks for sharing your knowledge, that is what a community is about. Now let me abuse your kidness with a few of questions. I just upgraded my Schecter Deluxe with a 35p (neck) and a 35dc (bridge). I removed the shecter preamp and now I have 1 volume and 1 tone knob go each pup (4 knobs total). Major tone improvement in general, but I'm still struggling with EQ - maybe this is just getting to know better the new toy.

First question, would you recommended to switch the P to the bridge position? I just assumed it would make more sense to keep the P on the neck position for it being close to where it would sit on a P bass. But I didn't try the other way around to make an educated choice, my 35P is an older version not like the solderless wiring DC.

Second question, I feel very small changes when I crank either tone knobs, may I have mis-installed it?

Third one, maybe I neet a BTS or BTC system to bring the whole thing together? Will it change the tone or just simplify the blending and EQ setup?
 
For over a decade on my 5-string I have played a 40CS in the mid (P) position and a 40JX in the bridge (J) position. My bridge pickup is routed so close to the bridge that I have flipped the pickup to have the stack coils in roughly a '60's J-bridge position. That extra little bit keeps the pickup from sounding brittle and mixes very well with the CS. Standard 9-volt installation: ABCX -> MV -> EXB -> MT -> Output. I find on stage the EXB to be much more useful on the fly than a typical bass-mid-treble preamp so I can grab and go, and not be fiddling with knobs, which would cause the drummer to have to wait on me instead of counting off the next song to keep the dancers on the floor. Finally, the EMG tone control at the end of the circuit, ever so slightly rolled off, takes out the rest of any residual hiss so my feed through a DI to the band's digital board is completely silent and clean so the sound man can slot me properly into the mix.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bass-shy
Hey man, thanks for sharing your knowledge, that is what a community is about. Now let me abuse your kidness with a few of questions. I just upgraded my Schecter Deluxe with a 35p (neck) and a 35dc (bridge). I removed the shecter preamp and now I have 1 volume and 1 tone knob go each pup (4 knobs total). Major tone improvement in general, but I'm still struggling with EQ - maybe this is just getting to know better the new toy.

First question, would you recommended to switch the P to the bridge position? I just assumed it would make more sense to keep the P on the neck position for it being close to where it would sit on a P bass. But I didn't try the other way around to make an educated choice, my 35P is an older version not like the solderless wiring DC.

Second question, I feel very small changes when I crank either tone knobs, may I have mis-installed it?

Third one, maybe I neet a BTS or BTC system to bring the whole thing together? Will it change the tone or just simplify the blending and EQ setup?
Hey buddy, no worries! Thanks for the message.
1: I really like a P in the bridge, especially the reverse coil (Spector style) like the 35 P is and the DC in the neck. It’s my taste though. I tend to use the balance between pickups a lot for my tone so enjoy a single or split in the bridge. Helps bring in that focus and tightness when needed. Having said that I also have a shortscale with exactly the set up you have now and like it because I wanted a more P like tone.

2: No, probably not mis installed, the EMG classic when used with the passive tone don’t tend to change much. Many people say the tone knobs do almost nothing. They are the 25k EMG pots?? I feel they do a bit, the active tone on the X series seems to work a bit better but I either don’t use tone or I use the BTC, not big on the passive tone

3: Yes, highly recommend. Personally having a blend control is a big part of my tone shaping, never liked two volumes. Also an active EQ is a cut and boost and I always found them more useful than just a passive treble roll off.

If I had the setup you have, I would leave the pickups as they are and just get the four knob pre amp (sounds like you have 4 holes in the bass?) and you won’t regret it. Then, go for the 18v mod. Will be a killer modern “PJ” that you can coax vintage sounds out of as well. Good all round bass
 
  • Like
Reactions: in tune and gcdoval
Hello fellow bassfolk🤟🤓

Ok soooooo, I am what I would consider a now long time devotee to EMG (multiple basses with EMG and also now over 30 basses converted) I have become a bit knowledgable about certain things so I would like to offer some help to those using/considering EMG and even some (dare I say it) personal opinions based on experinece and also create a bit if a “hub”.
I have now used every single piece of active gear (most multiple times over) EMG makes for bass in a wide variety of combinations, so here goes…..I will start with the 9v vs 18v thing and sharing my fave pickups and setup with EMG.
(Now, if you think its useful to tell me threads already exist covering any and all of these topics? Save your time, head over to another thread and share that wisdom with someone else.)

So the answer to the topic I have seen debated back and forth, does 18v make a difference? The answer is a resounding YES! Now let me clarify this, some pickups and setups the difference is more noticeable than with others however in every case the difference is there. And yes, it is head room, or maybe more easily explainable as enhanced or uncapped performance as far as someone who might not understand what headroom is.

One of my fave things is the EMG original P. I love it just on its own without any tone, just a volume, or with the BTC control set to the ON/ON position on the internal dip switches so the treble is not a treble it’s more a high mid boost at around 2.5k.

Anyway, so running this in either scenario with just a 9v is meaty and chunky and has those extended highs and lows we all love or hate from EMG. But the beast is chained, capped….when you dig in or slap or play with a bit of energy the “compressed” effect as most like to refer to it kicks in. It’s literally just the pre amp doing its best to produce the transients you are hitting it with but it just doesn’t have the juice or “head room” to do so. Now, one of my students plays very lightly, so with him I did the experiment of swapping from 9 to 18 also as a test and guess what? There was also a difference in the fundamental tone. So here come these magic words….colourful, open, untethered….even in this case the sound just got slightly richer, deeper, broader. It’s not a night and day scenario which is why some people still say they hear no difference but it is certainly discernible, no doubt.

As you strat to add other pickups in the circuit and start using pre amps and boosting and cutting it tends to also make a big difference in the “open” sense of the sound.

Now to address a few more things.
1: The X series
2: The sterile/compressed/scooped comments that EMG seem to get slugged with

1: I do not consider the X series at 9v to be the same as the classic at 18v. I must now add an opinion and matter of taste, I much prefer all the pickups in original format over the X series. It’s just my taste. Now, let’s talk the P pickup again. The X pickup on 9v does have the more “open” sound, not so “compressed” as the classic at 9v, which is similar to the classic at 18v however to my ears they are tonaly quite different and they are of lesser output. Oh, btw, another common misconception is adding the extra 9v makes the pickup louder or the batteries last longer….those are both false and untrue.

2: EMG pickups are all different, obviously, so let’s again look at the P but can be said for many of their offerings. I see lots of the scooped/sterile/compressed comments.
So one by one:
-Scooped: no, not the case. Yes, more treble and bass than many P bass pups on the market but the old idea, it’s easier to take away than add? You CAN make the P sound vintage by removing or EQ’ing out some of that bottom and treble, no issue. So in this case they are not scooped at all, more like “flat response”

-Sterile: well, again, in the case of the P, more accurate might be articulate and clear….that is for sure. Sterile is again a taste thing and I think a lot of the time a misdiagnosis of the clarity/articulation combined with the extra top end. But hey, that’s just my humble opinion. One persons sterile is another’s mess.

-Compressed: Yeah, as stated above at 9v you can hit a roof when it’s pushed, which makes it sound limited and the general colour of the note at 9v has everything feeling more tighter and compact, which lends a feeling of compression. This could actually be quite useful to some players, for others a nightmare. But yes, at 9v again just in my opinion, compressed is a very valid description. Hence I only run at 18v.

Now lastly, if anyone has any questions or observations? Go for it. I have tried so many things with my EMG gear I am sure I can either help with questions or offer an opinion if desired.

My favourite pickups and setups are as follows:

1: Just a classic P with a volume and 18v.

2: Ceramic J in the bridge and a PA or P in the neck with the BTC knob and ABC balance (I don’t like volume/volume setups)

3: Ceramic J bridge and DC neck with BTC and ABC.

4: Dual DC with BTC and ABC.

Like yourself, I'm a huge fan of EMG pickups and preamps. I currently have 4 different EMG equipped basses. I had a 5th that I moved on from, just because it was redundant with my collection and a friend in need required a gigging bass.

My addiction began in 2004 when I had a USA Hamer Cruise 2TEK 4 string routed for a 40J neck and 40DC bridge. It was my main bass for almost 20 years and I still have it. 18v BQS system.

The Chinese Peavey Grind 4 string had dual 40DC's, which is the one I no longer have. 9v BQC system.

I have a Brubaker Brute JX-4 I installed with a pair of JX's. 9v BQS system.

Kiesel.Vanquish multi scale 4 string. Dual 45TWX. This is my favorite, both in terms of comfort and tone.

Kiesel Zeus multi scale 4 string. 45PAX(r) neck, 45 TWX bridge. This is a VERY close 2nd place favorite in both comfort and tone

I personally haven't noticed any difference in regards to 9v vs 18v. However not really a scientific comparison as I've never had the same exact pickups operating on a different voltage. All basses have seen lots of use. I play between 40-80 gigs per year with regular rehearsals.

I don't record as much as I used to, but have gone through 2-3 year stretches recording a high percentage of gigs. I also run sound for my bands if it's a venue not providing reinforcement. The Kiesels are my main basses (18v) but The 9v Brute is used at most songs for a couple tunes as it's my Eb standard bass. I know more volts equals more headroom and not volume. It's a pure coincidence that the dual JX equipped Brute running at 9v is noticeable (not wildly) louder than any of my other EMG basses.

Pics for attention.
 

Attachments

  • 20211225_095506-COLLAGE.jpg
    20211225_095506-COLLAGE.jpg
    719 KB · Views: 24
I am not sure I fully graps the benefits of the ABC/ABCX with active pickups. Do you still get insertion loss even if both pickups are already buffered because they are active?

Also apparently the ABC allows you to blend passive and active pickups together, but do the regular EMGs actually blend well together this way or is there a big volume mismatch?

---
But anyway I am thinking of putting some EMG pickups and pres in one of my PJ basses since it's solder free and affordable, though unsure of whether to go with the Geezer Butler set or one of the active one like the Frank Bello or some mix and match or maybe even some sort of active/passive hybrid if there is any advantage
 
Last edited:
Hey Chris, Firstly it’s all EMG? All the pots and the pickups?
And secondly why do you want to run a passive tone with the active BTC? Most commonly an active bass only has a passive tone for when you switch from active to passive so you still have a control over the tone (usually a high cut). EMG pickups are active so just want to understand why you would want to implement a passive hi cut in the circuit if the BTC does it all?

Thanks mate✊🤓
The J-Set sound different when you run them only with a passive tone pot, and so I have the option between active with a Bass/Treble control and “passive” only with the tone knob. And all my holes in the Bass are filled 😊
 
I am not sure I fully graps the benefits of the ABC/ABCX with active pickups. Do you still get insertion loss even if both pickups are already buffered because they are active?

Also apparently the ABC allows you to blend passive and active pickups together, but do the regular EMGs actually blend well together this way or is there a big volume mismatch?

---
But anyway I am thinking of putting some EMG pickups and pres in one of my PJ basses since it's solder free and affordable, though unsure of whether to go with the Geezer Butler set or one of the active one like the Frank Bello or some mix and match or maybe even some sort of active/passive hybrid if there is any advantage
Hey mate, no you get no insertion loss at all using the ABC or ABCx with their active or passive pickups. However you can not use the ABCX with passive pickups, only the ABC and the standard ABC does not play nicely with the X series.

I will offer my option only here, it’s not gospel. I actually like the EMG Geezer, its the only passives I like from them, dont think you can go wrong if you want that more “classic” PJ and by that I not only mean tone wise but the classic situation where the J is no real match volume wise for the P at appropriate height settings which is par for the coarse with “traditional” PJ.

The Frank Bello is an X series set.
My suggestion is get the BTC active system that already comes including the ABCX. That way you have a choice of list of variations of P and J from the active selection, if you end up not liking the bello. If you go passive EMG and want a system and buy the BTC active/passive system you can then use any X series pickups.
Me? I would and have gone all active.
I can get the Geezer tone out of my active pickups but can’t get my active tone out of the Geezer set.
 
Me? I would and have gone all active.
I can get the Geezer tone out of my active pickups but can’t get my active tone out of the Geezer set.
And this pretty much answers the real most important question. I already primarily use active preamps anyway and like a wider frequency range, but may want a classic bass sound sometimes. If the actives can get in a similar territory to traditional sounds then that's a huge plus.