• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Ampeg V4B- the good, the bad, and NOS tubes

Always liking to change things isn't a bad thing is it?

When you had your fan installed, did you keep the back panel in place? A lot of people like to remove these to keep things cooler.

Yes I kept the back panel. The fan was at the front of the chassis angled to "blow" at the center of the quad. The rear panel helped to diffuse the air flow. Did not aim for thermal efficiency from the airflow, the compromise worked well enough. It ran cooler than with the 7027As w/o a fan.
 
The NOS 7027 are really rugged tubes....I've collected tubes for 25+ years but unfortunately have very few 7027....Angela.com used to have a bunch.

That's what I would run...the others I have plenty in my stash but the NOS 12au7 are really common and easily obtained for relatively cheap.
 
Thanks for the info. I'm wondering about adding a fan on mine.

Was the amp an early or later model? The early pre 74 model (top) was more blocked where the tubes are. The later model had the screen. I assume that they did this to help heat dissipation.

Mine was the early (1973). Would have to rethink with the "newer" rear panel. Lost my password with photobucket when the laptop died, one of these days I'll recover it.
 
It isn't like there was a space issue and they couldn't fit a 12AX7 and a 12AU7 in there. Ampeg wasn't the only company to use that tube in an amp for some strange reason. It looks like R2D2.

Yes more than enough room. Magnavox used them in TV sets, but wouldn't release the rights to other set manufacturers. Not the best plan considering SS devices were knocking hard at the door.