TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Hi meekee73_2008.
Italy is the home of Markbass, correct? What made you buy the tc rig?
yes man, correct but, in a very very few words, i've owned several things of MB (a cabinet, a little mark and a 1x12 combo) and IMVHO, it sucks...especially the cabinet: i really don't like what they're doing wiht neodymium speakers
I used to think that TC was another level of quality and, apart from some issues i've stated before, i'm still in that feel.
Michele
Just FYI. There are many, many, many posts by quite a few MB users who love the MB heads but, like you, don't really dig most of the cabs. I feel that way also.
If the TC doesn't work out, I would highly recommend revisiting the Markbass heads (especially the F1, F500 and the soon to be released LMIII) with other cabs. They sound sublime (if you like it clean and accurate) with Epifani and Bergantino cabs, in general. IMO!
i don't love MB heads either to be honest: in general MB really doesn't make my day
i was just re-listening to the recording of the gig where i used my new TC rig and i have to say that my bass really sounded good.
i think that both head and cabinet deserve another chance (or more than one) before i make a final statement
back to a comparison between tc and mb i think that, based on what i've tried of both brands, there's no contest: tc rulez
Michele
Cool. We all have different tone goals. You just didn't seem that jazzed with the TC stuff in your post above, and given the lukewarm response from others, I thought I'd throw the MB heads with different cabs idea out there. If I had only used and heard MB heads with their cabs, I wouldn't be nearly as positive myself. I love the simple, powerful, clean, accurate tone myself, but I don't use effects or 'tube emulation' and all that stuff.
i look at MB somewhat in a "suspicious way": they are young and, IMVHO, they're doing too many stuff recently: bass heads, cabs, guitar heads, P.A. and (recent news) they're going to produce stomp boxes too....we'll wait and see anyway
thanks for your contribution
Michele
People like Marco have been around for a long time. He didn't
just start with Markbass. So far, his concept and execution
have been very successful. If he has ideas and resources, why
wouldn't he want to expand his company and be even more
successful? Doing a number of different musical products
hasn't seemed to hurt Fender much. All the items you mention
easily fit under one business umbrella. Good luck Marco.
imho man: Fender is a thing apart..like cocacola etc..and, as far as i know, it's not going to produce P.A. for instance
MarkBass isn't that big..isn't it?
cheers
Michele

imho man: Fender is a thing apart..like cocacola etc..and, as far as i know, it's not going to produce P.A. for instance
MarkBass isn't that big..isn't it?
cheers
Michele
Look back at the 60's. Even then, Fender made instruments,
amplifiers, P.A's. Soon after, they offered the Fender Rhodes
piano. Vox did amps, instruments, pedals, etc.
My point is: If Markbass does one thing well, why can't it do
other things well also? I can assure you these new items won't
be out for quite some time. Markbass does a good amount of
r&d on their gear. We should be happy seeing a musical
instrument company doing well in this economic climate.
