• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Are silks supposed to line up?

Nov 21, 2021
380
962
Disclosures
None
I just put on these LaBella 760FL set. Surprised that one of the silk lines doesn't line up with the others. My previous flats, and current tapes are in a nice row. Wondering if there is a reason these don't? Curious if it bugs you when they don't line up?
PXL_20240106_234609679.jpg
I am the first to admit this is not an important issue.
 
I just put on these LaBella 760FL set. Surprised that one of the silk lines doesn't line up with the others. My previous flats, and current tapes are in a nice row. Wondering if there is a reason these don't? Curious if it bugs you when they don't line up?View attachment 5308595 I am the first to admit this is not an important issue.
Totally normal for long-scale La Bella flats, and disclosed by them upfront here:
https://www.labella.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/La-Bella-Strings-Bass-String-Guide-2-1.pdf
 
I just put on these LaBella 760FL set. Surprised that one of the silk lines doesn't line up with the others. My previous flats, and current tapes are in a nice row. Wondering if there is a reason these don't? Curious if it bugs you when they don't line up?View attachment 5308595 I am the first to admit this is not an important issue.

If you look at where the silks start on A-D-G, and where the E tuner post is, you can tell the E string would be too long if it were the same length as the other three. La Bella wants to make sure only the thinner silked part of the E string wraps around the post. I actually like their design.
 
I have often used a through the body anchoring for an E string, and top loaded the rest, because I wanted to make sure th efat part of the E string didn't warp around the tuner post. When I did that, it looked like this.

At this point i'm playing 5's. I have Boomers (red silks) on one bass, but...I use a GHS Bassics 130 for the B string - it matches the rest of the set sonically better than the Boomer 130 (go figure). On that bass, I have silks on 4 strings, no silk at all on the B. I'm OK with that; this is a bit less of an issue.
 
At this point i'm playing 5's. I have Boomers (red silks) on one bass, but...I use a GHS Bassics 130 for the B string - it matches the rest of the set sonically better than the Boomer 130 (go figure). On that bass, I have silks on 4 strings, no silk at all on the B. I'm OK with that; this is a bit less of an issue.

I've been mix-and-matching the low B's on my fivers in order to achieve a better tonal balance as well.

GHS PW L7200 200113-2.jpg
 
If you look at where the silks start on A-D-G, and where the E tuner post is, you can tell the E string would be too long if it were the same length as the other three. La Bella wants to make sure only the thinner silked part of the E string wraps around the post. I actually like their design.

They could have had the silks run down further on the other 3 strings; the reason they did what they did is they use the same design for the top 3 strings in both the long and extra long sets (only the E string changes) - they're saving sku's - not having to make as many variations. I buy Kaliums, and everything from .094" and down in gauge is the same string regardless of scale.
 
They could have had the silks run down further on the other 3 strings; the reason they did what they did is they use the same design for the top 3 strings in both the long and extra long sets (only the E string changes) - they're saving sku's - not having to make as many variations. I buy Kaliums, and everything from .094" and down in gauge is the same string regardless of scale.
Thanks, I was wondering why they did it that way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wyrdlow
I just put on these LaBella 760FL set. Surprised that one of the silk lines doesn't line up with the others. My previous flats, and current tapes are in a nice row. Wondering if there is a reason these don't? Curious if it bugs you when they don't line up?View attachment 5308595 I am the first to admit this is not an important issue.
No, not really
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wyrdlow
If you look at where the silks start on A-D-G, and where the E tuner post is, you can tell the E string would be too long if it were the same length as the other three. La Bella wants to make sure only the thinner silked part of the E string wraps around the post. I actually like their design.
Yes, it's entirely intentional and definitely good design.

Though ... now you've got me running around looking at the headstocks on all my basses - most of which have D'Addario Chromes - to check if they line up, too. And they do. Except ... on my Ibanezes, the G strings don't line up, and I'm assuming due to the staggered tuner positions on their headstocks.
 
Last edited:
Wow... it never occurred to me to even notice this. Now I'll never be able to look at my basses the same way again.

But wait... all this careful planning on the part of esthetically conscious string manufacturers goes out the window as soon as you cut off excess string length, doesn't it?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Peter - Oregon