• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

bass body: afzelia vs. padouk

One, two, five... (three, sir)... three...


The most valid answer is, make two otherwise identical basses and then tell us.

I don't know of any luthiers who have made a large quantity of mostly similar basses, using both woods, who could offer an educated opinion.

Many people offer completely foundationless, internet-repeated opinions. And even there, not so much on afzelia.
 
I've built my first two "serious" basses with these woods...

The first one had Afzelia body, Ovangkol neck, Bolivian Rosewood fingerboard and Kent Armstrong pickup. The second one had Padouk body, Ovangkol neck and Pau Ferro fingerboard with Bartolini pickup.

Even unplugged the Afzelia bodied bass had more high mids and mids while Padouk had more bass and high frequency (with an awesome slap tone, I must add).
The body affects the sound on bolt-on and set-in basses while (IMHO, of course) wings have less influence on neck-thru 'cause the strings vibrate on the neck wood and the wings only take a small part in that (if any).
 
I've built my first two "serious" basses with these woods...

The first one had Afzelia body, Ovangkol neck, Bolivian Rosewood fingerboard and Kent Armstrong pickup. The second one had Padouk body, Ovangkol neck and Pau Ferro fingerboard with Bartolini pickup.

Even unplugged the Afzelia bodied bass had more high mids and mids while Padouk had more bass and high frequency (with an awesome slap tone, I must add).
The body affects the sound on bolt-on and set-in basses while (IMHO, of course) wings have less influence on neck-thru 'cause the strings vibrate on the neck wood and the wings only take a small part in that (if any).

thanks, now that's helpful.

now, thread closed.
 

Latest posts