• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Basswood vs mahogany

Hi guys, can anyone tell me how big different from each other might be those two woods? I love sound of friends SR505 which is mahogany body with bubnga/jatoba I think, even not plugged in. But watching old japanese SR probably from basswood (i think) and maple neck. I was happy with my RG550 and 570 but those were guitars not basses...

I am fan of deep, warm darker sound of bass and wondering if EQ might be enough to get similar result when plugged in. Thanks. :)
 
I am not a fan of basswood but mahogany is OK by me. Every bass I've played with basswood just sounds kind of blah to me. I am not by any means a "tonewood" type of guy but I've never dug basswood on basses or guitars.

Well, thing is, this SR I am looking at, is passibe, so maybe the wood makes bigger difference here. But hoping the P near the neck would be pretty beast. Read post from the guy with same passive model his sound was huge... so hoping it is gonna be my case too. Used only models with big MM type humbucker SRX, Bart Mk1 and MK2. Liked all of them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Outtaseezun
Well, thing is, this SR I am looking at, is passibe, so maybe the wood makes bigger difference here. But hoping the P near the neck would be pretty beast. Read post from the guy with same passive model his sound was huge... so hoping it is gonna be my case too. Used only models with big MM type humbucker SRX, Bart Mk1 and MK2. Liked all of them.
If you have a bass with MK1 you´re fine. The 505 won´t give you anything new then. But a nice SR PJ Bass would be a nice adition imo.
 
If you have a bass with MK1 you´re fine. The 505 won´t give you anything new then. But a nice SR PJ Bass would be a nice adition imo.
Having btb470 now with MK2, but I do not like the bass that much. Sound and look is great... But feeling I am fighting still with it. Maybe it is action only tho. Maybe it is only high nut, compared to other. But still I think it is combination of longer scale and thicker neck so looking into SR. Or back to SRX.
 
Having btb470 now with MK2, but I do not like the bass that much. Sound and look is great... But feeling I am fighting still with it. Maybe it is action only tho. Maybe it is only high nut, compared to other. But still I think it is combination of longer scale and thicker neck so looking into SR. Or back to SRX.
But then you definetly know the sound. So you can decide what to do. As you can see: i like the SRX...
 
But then you definetly know the sound. So you can decide what to do. As you can see: i like the SRX...
Well, noticed it now,
actually i have lost in auction yesterday when tried to get SRX430 (had before SRX400 but sold it...) So now it is SR with PJ and then I do not know how it is gonna sound. But I guess with Ampeg head and cab, it will shred and tear anyways. BTW. I think that SRX was mahogany body with maple neck. So still the sound of SR in basswood will be different a bit. We shall see. I think still playability for me is the main point...
 
  • Like
Reactions: bench
Martin, Gibson, Taylor, Guild, Collings, Santa Cruz, other boutique acoustic guitar builders....

Not a single acoustic guitar company / builder uses basswood

(Maybe some lower quality / inexpensive models exist, but certainly zero high quality builds are basswood)

Yes there are basswood electric guitars and basses - perhaps the more important the pickups and electronics, the less important the wood ?

Maybe I was better off decades ago when I played what I liked and knew nothing about tonewoods, building techniques, etc

FWIW, probably less than nothing, I do not consider basswood a "musical wood"
 
I have a MTD K6 with a basswood body. It is a monster. No issues with the wood at all. Not promoting bass wood, I do have a lot of other basses, but the bass wood works fine for that bass. It is nice that my 6 is my lightest bass. I think of mahogany as being heavy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wakizashis
I have a G&L CLF L1000 with basswood and it sounds fine to me. I think the MFD pickup, substantial bridge and other elements of the design more than makeup for a wood some think isn’t very good. I have an ash L2000 and can’t say it sounds better because of the wood.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Flog and Wakizashis
Wood barely makes a difference in solid body instruments and varies a lot from regions, from trees and even from location in the tree it is cut from. Some want to believe that it matters a lot and that a very vague species denomination like mahogany offers particular characteristics in spite of the above. None of what they have to say is worth consideration.

This has not been my experience at all! I have been playing and tinkering with basses for nearly 30 years and I have absolutely heard differences coming from the tone woods even with the same electronics! The wood is not THE defining element in the overall tone, but I do personally note the differences.

Case in point, basswood is why I cannot fall in love with the tone of Music Man Bongo basses (even though it's my avatar...). However, Stingrays sound so much better to me and those use ash bodies. Both use the same pickups and the Bongos have more versatile preamps (4-band). It's also not the pickup placement that makes the difference for me because I very much prefer the pickup placement of the Bongos.
 
I've owned MusicMan in both mahogany (Stingray and Big Al) and basswood (Bongo). I thought basswood was every bit as good and lighter than mahogany. (I did like the Bongo tone.) I understand basswood has unattractive grain so they tend to be solid colors. But builders use it because of its tone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wakizashis
I had a neck through that was part mahogany, it was a beautiful bass. I can not say that it sounded any better. My own experiences, wood type is a very far distant 4th behind strings, pickups, electronics in affecting the sound. I would not sweat the wood type very much. I simple turn of the tone control can resolve that.
 
Last edited:
Case in point, basswood is why I cannot fall in love with the tone of Music Man Bongo basses (even though it's my avatar...). However, Stingrays sound so much better to me and those use ash bodies. Both use the same pickups and the Bongos have more versatile preamps (4-band). It's also not the pickup placement that makes the difference for me because I very much prefer the pickup placement of the Bongos.

No, they do not use the same pickups, nor have they ever used the same pickups. Nor is the preamp the same. Not even the new Special Stingray uses the same neodymium pickups like Bongo, not to mention the older alnico ones (or ceramic in some instances of Stingray 5s). So you basing your dislike for Bongo on "basswood" is ridiculous to say the least. Stingrays used ash, poplar and even alder. I've had them in several wood combinations and they always sounded like Stingrays. Oh, and Bongo (single H model) has the pickup placement in the Music Man "sweet spot", meaning the same as Stingrays. Bongo HH/HS is a different story though (H closer to the bridge), so I can't be 100% sure which one you're referring to.
 
Basswood looks a bit plain with transparent finishes but apart from that I like it. I know it's supposed to dent easier than other woods but honestly, if you've got a problem with denting basswood instruments you'll probably dent other woods too.

One of my best sounding P-basses is basswood (MIJ Traditional 60s). MusicMan use basswood. Many boutique luthiers use basswood. And many cheap entry level mass manufactured brands/models use basswood which is probably where it got it's bad reputation. Basswood obviously come in different qualities, just like any other wood.

I've got nothing against mahogany either but all my mahogany basses are Gibsons or Epiphones and they all have a far too ideosyncratic tone to draw any conclusions about the wood.
 
janka-scale.jpg