• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Benefit gig & moral quandary — WWTBD?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Whatever happened to innocent until proven guilty?

...is a principle in criminal law (only) by which the full force of criminal penalties cannot be exercised against a person until their guilt has been proven to the standards of judicial evidence (beyond a reasonable doubt).

Has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with whether a band, or anyone else, considers it appropriate to be associated with you.

Society has, and SHOULD have, lots of sanctions against wrong and harmful behavior other than criminal conviction.
 
My thoughts:

  • You're not under investigation (nor is anyone in your group)
  • You didn't book the person that is.
  • Working under the assumption that if this person is found to be in violation of anything, they will face disciplinary action, it really falls under the responsibility of the person that booked the gig.
  • You already committed.
Play the gig keep your head down. If anyone asks - "this is the first I'm hearing of it, and I can't give an opinion about something that I know no facts."
 
  • Like
Reactions: JRA and Oddly
To be objective, what is the most harm to your reputation? Doing the gig with said person under investigation or cancelling? Personally I would do the gig as word of dropping out might be more harmful to your reputation in the long run, but I don’t know your community.

Also, remember that you haven’t done anything wrong. It’s not really your problem
 
Status
Not open for further replies.