I was more implying that the style of music as a whole requires no talent.
THAT sir......is one of the stupidest f*****g things i have ever heard anyone say. ever.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I was more implying that the style of music as a whole requires no talent.
Sure it's simple. But if simple = no talent, I'd go ahead and say rock, not limited to grunge, is a talentless genre. And if you're one of those snobs... cool, more power to you. I'm sure you are basing this one the 1 or 2 Nirvana songs you've heard.
exactly that!! that's what any close minded a**hat would judge off of. and krist novoselic isn't even a bad bass player either! love buzz, lounge act, etc. were all AMAZING basslines, but god forbid any moron that hates nirvana or grunge for that matter just proves that they haven't even looked into the genre with depth just cause of a few popular songs that they've heard. i guarantee anyone here that says krist novoselic sucks hasn't even heard anything that isn't popular by nirvana....it's madning, and quite pathetic.
if you think grunge takes no "talent", than apperently you haven't looked into the alt. rock scene of the 00's. at all...cause just 1 grunge band can blow nickelback and all of it's clones so far out of the water, it isn't even funny.
alice in chains had two bassists.
Not to say you're wrong, but you're whole argument falls apart when you run into some that actually HAS listened to a lot of material from said artists (such as Nirvana) and still hates them.
I knew quite a number of people back in high school that could not stand most of the people mentioned in this topic - particularly Nirvana - after listening to the majority of their material. According to them, they tried to give grunge as whole a chance, over and over again, but it just didn't work and the sound was a pain in the neck to hear after a while.
Eddie Jackson do it for me when it comes to that scene.
Is that Eddie Jackson from Queensryche? I really don't know the parameter for Grunge but I assume it's most of the rock based music in the early 90's. If that's the case what about Justin Chancellor and the other, original bassist for Tool?
Me.Ament, by miles. Mostly for his versatility and melodicism, and the sheer fact that Pearl Jam are still relevant now.
His fretless stuff, especially, is stunning ("Oceans", anyone?), and his 12-string work has become seminal - I mean, who doesn't pick up an 8- or 12-string bass and try the "Jeremy" riff?

My vote is for Soundgarden bass player and founding member - Hiro Yamamoto.
Not liking a particular genre of music is not the same as saying the musicians suck. I don't like all that growly death metal, but I know it takes some talent to play it.
I was more implying that the style of music as a whole requires no talent.
Not to say you're wrong, but you're whole argument falls apart when you run into some that actually HAS listened to a lot of material from said artists (such as Nirvana) and still hates them.
I knew quite a number of people back in high school that could not stand most of the people mentioned in this topic - particularly Nirvana - after listening to the majority of their material. According to them, they tried to give grunge as whole a chance, over and over again, but it just didn't work and the sound was a pain in the neck to hear after a while.