Can my Squier ever be like my Lakland?

Those basses look nice, I like your style.

You have to tell us what style your going after and a then a few people will chime in.

You should have a few choices in pickups for a hundred bucks.

 

Perhaps you've wondered what caused the price differential between the Lakland and the Squier...

 

I absolutely love the Nordstrand NJ4's I put in my Jazz bass. Great vintage sound but enough punch to get through in the mix. I've never played a Lakland though, so I'm not sure how they would compare there. I got mine second hand, but still new in the package here on talk bass for somewhere between 100-150.

 

If you feed it well, and exercise it on a daily basis, maybe one day your Squier can become a man´s bass like your Lakie...

hahah kidding, as a matter of fact your Squier is an excelent instrument, i think that a Pup swap and a nice setup (w/ really nice strings like DR´s) will do ya.

 

Less than a $100 total or per pup? If it's per pup, the Aero type 1 pups will give it some serious grind like the DJ. I bought a Squier 70 VMJ as well, and sent it back after a couple of days. Just didn't do it for me, and I didn't want to spend any money on it.

 

I agree. I have a Squire VM Fretless and with TI Flats on it. Better but not there yet. I don't think the pups are what I want. I was thinking Bartolini. I have had DiMarzzio Ultra Jazz pups before and liked them, but I really like the Barts in my other bass.

I was thinking I should dump the Squire, but it does play nice and sounds OK and I need a fretless for my jazz gigs. Maybe it's time to spend $100 on some pups and see what happens.

 

And you wouldn't have to be spending money to make it sound better. I guess I just find this a bit perplexing with all the TB folks buying SX or Squier basses and trying to get them to sound like something that costs 5-10 times more. If it's for fun, then no problem I guess. But if you really want something that sounds and plays like the real deal, better to just buy it than do the upgrades. YMMV.

FWIW, the Aero pups would likely make it sound much, much better. But the Squier I had needed much more work than that. It had dead spots everywhere becuase of the wood choice and the neck pocket. Nut was insanely high, fret level was horrid, pots felt bad out of the box, hardware looked like it would corrode in the first year, no sustain to the notes at all....all in all about what I should have expected considering the cost. I would guess that some of these basses are better than others just because of the nature of how they're made. I'm certainly not opposed to budget instruments, especially if it's a "beater" bass, but I guess I'm just at the point where a beater bass is the same as the instrument I would take to the studio. I take care of my instruments as best I can, so I don't really worry about them getting destroyed or beaten. If that's what you're afraid of, then maybe something like a Squier will fit the bill, but I'd suggest that you prepare for a lot of compromises so that you can try to enjoy playing it. Once you've played an instrument like a Lakland, US or Skyline, then playing a Squier, even with the improved quality over the last few years, is going to be disappointing. Before you spend money on pickups, make sure that the rest of the bass doesn't need a lot of work as well.

Respectfully and IMO/E.

 

Your Squier can be just like your Lakland! Case in point: A friend of mine was faced with a wife inspired moratorium on new guitar purchases. She had put her foot down, and there were to be no more large guitar related purchases. Over the course of a few months, my pal discretely, one by one, purchased the most expensive boutique components for a custom strat. He then, part by part and over a period of time, replaced every bit of his Lake Placid Blue Tokai Strat copy with parts by Fralin, Warmoth, Callaham..... including a gorgeous Mary Kay Blonde swamp ash body from Warmoth. When the transformation was complete, he brought the guitar to a gig. During a break his wife came up, complimented the band's sound, and asked her husband "Is that a new guitar?" and he, in all seriousness replied, "No Babe, this is my blue Strat."

So, based on this experience, in short any guitar or bass can easily be mad to sound and look like any other guitar or bass, either over a period of time, or in one quick swap.

 

Proves my point. I guess if you want to swap each individual part out, including the body and everything else like this guyd did, you can have a nice instrument. I'd rather just go buy the Strat, or the Lakland, or the whatever. Like I said, if you do it for fun then it's different. But if you start out with a HUGE compromise like Squier, and then have to spend $1000 on parts to make it play like a Joe Osborne or Darryl Jones, what's the point?

 

I put quarter pound pickups on mine and run it through an outboard sadowsky preamp. I like it better than my friends Sadowsky.

 

Without beig able to put my hands on your bass it is hard to answer the question properly. The VM basses are darn good for what you pay for them, but the Lakland has had the time and effort put into it, to make it sing.

Your VM may just be a really good bass, hiding behind a poor setup. I personally find that you can't really unlock a jazz style basses true potential until it is really setup well. Then you really need to play with pickup balance and find a, or, the sweet spot range for that bass.

I personally find the SD pickups in those basses pretty darn good. They have good bottom end, and with the right amount of bridge/neck pickup balance/adjustment, you should be able to achieve a tone window to work from. This is all dependant on the personality of your bass as far as where that window falls.

How would you compare the acoustic tone of the two basses? Are they close or vastly different. I would assume fairly different given the body woods, and body thickness. Then there is the difference in the necks as well.

It is not as simple as saying try string/pickup "X" I use them and there great. They are great on that bass with it's personality. While you can generally have an idea of how something will work, you don't really know till you hear it on your bass.

Can you be more articulate in your description as to what you are hearing is different in the two basses? You say the Squier feels good, but say it in a way that leads me to believe it is not quite where you want it to be.

I think that in the end you can tweak the Squier into a darn good playing sounding bass, but you need to approach it with clear thoughts as to exactly what aspect your trying to hit with each adjustment. Will it ever be exact, no, and I don't think you meant that anyway. I think that it can be so good that you will really aprreciate it, and maybe not want to take it to those rainy gigs either.

I've used the Gotoh 201 bridge in the past. I thought it was a well made bridge, and looked great. Tonally, after trying some other bridges, I'm underwhelmed by them. Personally I'd opt to use the Gotoh vintage style bridge, and make a few tweaks to it.

Most of all have fun with this. I love doing this kind of work with my basses.

 

Some of the Squiers I've played were nice for their price, and others not so much. I've not seen one that approached the playability of a Lakland, especially stock, but one might exist.

Those are all very good reasons to do it. I just wanted to warn you against turning a beater into an expensive bass by putting a bunch of upgrades into it. Unless that's what you want to do, then it's all good. If I had $1000 into an instrument, I wouldn't want it to say "Squier" on it though! And I'm not ashamed to play them. I bought one expecting to do just that, in public and all.

 

Have you tried an outboard pre?

 

you should put darkstars in it...