• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Danelectro 63 Long Scale - My Mini Review

First off, I need to put a block on my computer for craigslist... I have this disorder where, even though I have all the basses I really need, I can't stop looking at CL daily... "Hello. My name is Robert and I am a G.A.S.-oholic"...

Picked up a Danelectro 63 Long Scale yesterday off of the list. Great seller, had the bass in my hands, tuned and plugged in a few minutes after we walked in. Plunked some notes, made sure everything functioned, cased and cashed out in about five minutes. I love these kinds of transactions!

Got the bass home and gave it a more thorough going-over for build issues, etc... I am a long-time owner of an early Longhorn RI, so I'm familiar with the Dano's design and construction 'flaws', (I actually dig their 'unapologetic' vibe). The 63 is really not so much a 're-issue', but more of a new bass with old-shcool appointments. It is built well, sturdy neck join, thick slab rosewood board, chunky masonite pickguard, (no breakout on the input jack with this baby!!)... The finish is a satin-y black that feels great and doesn't show a ton of prints. Smoked chrome bridge, tuners, and strap pins. Decidedly different that the Longhorn!

The biggest thing that I've read about these basses is that the pickups are supposedly more approximating the originals than the earlier basses, (late '90s). I will say that the output is a bit hotter and that the p'ups sound throatier than those on my '00 LHRI... More grunt than punch. They are different. Not better or worse, just a different sounding package.

My major electronics gripe is with the controls and switching system. Personally, I've never liked the 'Neck/Both/Bridge' type switches, but hey, that's just one guys' opinion... Obviously, it has it's place. I've grown accustomed to the Longhorn's concentric pots and have dialed in a tone on it that I cannot duplicate on the 63, (Neck: V = 10, T = 10 -- Bridge: V = 10, T = 0)... Also, the pots seem to me to be linear taper, with the first 10% being the most effective. At this point, I will say that I usually play a two-pickup bass with everything dimed, so this is almost a non-issue. The 63 has a great tone full up. I just don't find a very effective taper in the tone pot until nearly the zero position. That's probably a future mod... Each pickup soloed sounded clear and distinct like a good single coil should, though the output was somewhat reduced, (duh!!)... I'd probably never run either p'up soloed in a band context anyway, so another non-issue...

Another gripe, albeit it one that I knew going in, is that Danelectro used the same 63 body for guitar, short-scale bass, and long-scale bass... That first fret is way-the-hell-and-gone out there!! Quite a reach that will take some getting used to... A longer strap may help. BTW, has anyone else noticed their straps 'shrinking' as they age?? All my basses seem to sit higher on me these days :D The 63 will take some getting used to playing standing up, and it will probably be a bit before this turns into a more-than-one-set-a-night bass...

I was able to play it for a few songs last night during a jam at a friends place, and in a band setting it really sat well in the mix... Very even response and nicely voiced for rockin' blues, which is what was going on. Really responsive to plucking position, with decent variety. I had a tougher time today trying to comfortably thumb-pluck-palm-mute by the bridge, which is becoming a staple in my roots group, so I will have to work on that, but I can see this bass sitting well with my group. I'll be gig-testing it on the 26th...

I'll give it some time before making a final decision, but right now, this bass is screaming "I'm a keeper!!!"

-robert
 

Attachments

  • Danelectro001.jpg
    Danelectro001.jpg
    75.6 KB · Views: 529
  • Like
Reactions: Michael Vee
CamiloDíaz;7566488 said:
didn't Entwhistle declared somewhere that he recorded My generation on a Dano, but never toured with it due to the bass' lack of resistance to the general "gear smashing" they did at shows?

anyway, you GASed me out for good. Is either this one or a Tbird or an EB-3 this days for me, in terms of wishlist.

I thought that he never smashed his gear, he left that up to Pete and Keith...
 
CamiloDíaz;7566488 said:
didn't Entwhistle declared somewhere that he recorded My generation on a Dano, but never toured with it due to the bass' lack of resistance to the general "gear smashing" they did at shows?

He actually took several passes at recording the song on a Dano Longhorn but kept breaking strings... Couldn't find replacement strings, so had to buy new basses, (so the legend goes)... Ended up recording the tune with a Jazz Bass... This is the only Entwhistle/Dano encounter I am aware of...

FWIW, while it certainly isn't as 'stout' as a Fender-type, there's nothing really 'delicate' about any Dano I've ever held... They'll stand up to normal day-to-day use as well as anything else... Abuse is something else altogether!

-robert
 
I thought that he never smashed his gear, he left that up to Pete and Keith...

;) You should see his "Bass Collection" book. It's full of references to gear that he trashed and he even has a framed, display case with about 30 pieces of a Warwick Buzzard in, which he smashed repeatedly into the ground during one show. It was given to him by his road manager (IIRC), as a testament to "The Wrath of The Ox" :D!

RIP, John :atoz:
 
I'd advise replacing that cheap POS bridge screw with a real screw before it breaks and you have to drill it out. Mine did it and I've read about others.
Other than that, I am really enjoying this bass. Plays great. Its sound kinda reminds me of the Rickenbacker I used to own (stolen).
 
I got one a couple of weeks ago when MF had their memorial day sale. I've also owned a couple of Danos so I knew what to expect. After 1 gig and lots of plays in the house, this is my take:

What I love:
  • The price. Paid $161 new after saying the MF code word "hero".
  • The looks. People stare at this thing. Some laugh.
  • The sound IMO is freaking awesome. Deep, dark, thick, throaty, punchy, authoritative. The band loved it. I ABed Hodads with an American P deluxe several times at gigs way back, and both the band (a different one) and I were amazed. It just seemed to offer so much more sound on every level.
What I like:
  • The feel of the neck. I like the satin finish a lot.
  • The action is good.
  • The simplicity. Most of my basses are active with lots of EQ options.
  • The weight. I don't even feel it on my shoulder. Didn't notcie the longer neck thing the OP speaks of. Wasn't an issue for me.
What I don't like:
  • Neck is unstable. 85 degrees ---> air conditioned place reaks havoc on the setup. Had the same issue with my Hodads.
  • Ya gotta take the neck off to adjust it, which makes the above a much bigger issue.
  • 60 cycle hum. Can't use this bass in front of my computer. Something is up with my apartment though as passive basses roar when plugged in here. Bass was fine on the gig.
  • Not the greatest bass for slapping, but capable of a real sweet old school slap kinda thing.
  • Not thrilled about the guitar tuners. Have to thread them like a guitar and it just didn't seem right. Not confident that they're not going to slip, although they haven't.
 
Turock: I have a vintage 'popsicle-stick' bridge coming from AllParts. I'll definitely check the screw mounts when I replace it. Thanks for the heads-up! Also, I too had a Rickenbacker stolen... Sad affair :(

Bluesy Soul: I've never spent any dedicated time with the DCs, but I have run across them a couple of times in jam situations... They sounded very similar to my Longhorn, with a clear bottom, (probably due more to scale-length and round-wound strings than anything else). The two DCs that I played had the same 'reach' issue, for the same reason... Similar bodies for both guitar and bass, (which is how I knew that this bass would feel long beforehand)... For me, it will just be a 'getting used to' deal.

The '90s DCs had the same electronics package as the Longhorns, (which, thankfully, Danelectro is reviving with the 'Dead-On' Danos :hyper: ), so I would believe that the same parallels could be drawn. I'm not a fan of the 63's controls, but again, that's solely my own opinion.

One thing I did do after posting last night was to dime the controls on my Longhorn and side-by-side the two. Even taking into account the scale length and different strings, the Longhorn sounded tamer by comparison than I would have expected. To my ears, the 63's pickups appear to be a step in the right direction... Those pickups loaded into the Longhorn would be an interesting experiment...

The bass is definitely light-weight, if for no other reason than the Evets/Danelectro construction philosophy regarding hollow-body-plywood/masonite as a viable alternative to solid wood. I can't argue with 'em there!!

Hope this helps,

-robert
 
I got one a couple of weeks ago when MF had their memorial day sale. I've also owned a couple of Danos so I knew what to expect. After 1 gig and lots of plays in the house, this is my take:

What I love:
  • The price. Paid $161 new after saying the MF code word "hero".
  • The looks. People stare at this thing. Some laugh.
  • The sound IMO is freaking awesome. Deep, dark, thick, throaty, punchy, authoritative. The band loved it. I ABed Hodads with an American P deluxe several times at gigs way back, and both the band (a different one) and I were amazed. It just seemed to offer so much more sound on every level.
What I like:
  • The feel of the neck. I like the satin finish a lot.
  • The action is good.
  • The simplicity. Most of my basses are active with lots of EQ options.
  • The weight. I don't even feel it on my shoulder. Didn't notcie the longer neck thing the OP speaks of. Wasn't an issue for me.
What I don't like:
  • Neck is unstable. 85 degrees ---> air conditioned place reaks havoc on the setup. Had the same issue with my Hodads.
  • Ya gotta take the neck off to adjust it, which makes the above a much bigger issue.
  • 60 cycle hum. Can't use this bass in front of my computer. Something is up with my apartment though as passive basses roar when plugged in here. Bass was fine on the gig.
  • Not the greatest bass for slapping, but capable of a real sweet old school slap kinda thing.
  • Not thrilled about the guitar tuners. Have to thread them like a guitar and it just didn't seem right. Not confident that they're not going to slip, although they haven't.

Thanks for posting Joe... Excellent points! A few personal 'observations' and one oversight...

  • The 'long-reach' probably also has some 'body-type' origins... I believe that I may be a significantly 'rounder' type than average :D
  • I was amazed at how little hum I was getting, although it was present no matter what pickup configuration I was in... Less than the Longhorn, certainly. The place I'm playing next week is a notorious 'hum-factory', so I'll call that the acid test...
  • My Longhorn has been 'set-it-and-forget-it' as far as adjusting the neck, so I'm hoping for more of the same from this bass. Yeah, pulling the neck to adjust is a PITA, but a known part of the Dano thing... I guess I'm calling it a non-issue for me... Barring any stability issues, that is...
  • I didn't consider the slap aspect as I'm not a slap-stylist on electric, but yeah, I can totally see it... The string profile is fairly flat, and that pickguard is thick, thick, thick! Not a lot of room to get under the string...

-robert
 
Thanks, rllefebv. Your impressions and comments are much appreciated.

I've encountered bass players for a few regional and B-level national acts who use Danos, usually Longhorns or DCs and usually in blues or blues-based bands. In every instance, the player loved the bass and it sounded fantastic in the mix. Deep, thick, yet cut through, etc.

I hadn't encountered any 63s yet, except in the music store. If I decide to get any Dano, it looks and sounds to me like swapping out the bridge (for the aftermarket 4-saddle version) and the tuners might be in order. Has anyone eliminated there "hum" problem with shielding? Is there much to shield !?

Bluesy Soul :cool:
 
I think the unstable neck is partly due to the slab board. I was all set to buy one until my friend got one. It sounds and plays great, but I don't see the bass having a long gigging life before the neck is shot with the amount of relief its getting.
 
Bluesy Soul -- The 63s actually come with the adjustable, 4 saddle bridge. I'm going the other way and swapping for a vintage style 'popsicle-stick' bridge from AllParts... Mine also has very little hum...

bluewine -- Yes, they have truss rods. You have to totally remove the neck to adjust, (which admittedly is a hassle), but it's there...

GE -- We'll have to see on the neck. I have had any number of basses with slab boards, and haven't had any problems. The neck on my Longhorn has had a single adjustment and hasn't shifted at all in the six years that I have had it. If only I could say the same about my '96 P!! This 63 is wearing a .105 E string and the relief is pretty great, exactly where I would have set it. I will be keeping any eye on it... If it turds out, I'll order a short scale neck from DanGuitars...

I just came up from putting it through it's paces on my gig-rig, '71 Ampeg V4 into a Musicman 115HD... Oh Yeah... Plenty of tone!

-robert