TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Just finished "Team of Rivals" about Abraham Lincoln's cabinet, and "Pride and Prejudice" for light reading. I really enjoyed both.
Right now, re-discovering the great Robertson Davies and reading the Deptford Trilogy. Finished Fifth Business and moving on to The Manticore.
View attachment 3983386
This trilogy is one of my personal “touchstone series” of books that I reread every 5-10 years. Davies was in the zone when he wrote these! The Cornish trilogy was also great, but nothing tops Deptford.
Currently reading this:
View attachment 4130044
I often cringe at this type of book, but this one is really excellent and I am considering making it required reading for my grad students. It really resonates.
This trilogy is one of my personal “touchstone series” of books that I reread every 5-10 years. Davies was in the zone when he wrote these! The Cornish trilogy was also great, but nothing tops Deptford.
Currently reading this:
View attachment 4130044
I often cringe at this type of book, but this one is really excellent and I am considering making it required reading for my grad students. It really resonates.
Currently reading this:
View attachment 4130044
I often cringe at this type of book, but this one is really excellent and I am considering making it required reading for my grad students. It really resonates.
I loved the Cornish trilogy as well. Now finished the Deptford Trilogy (again) and I think you have to reach a certain age before these sorts of retrospective books make deep sense. Each, after all, is a late-life assessment by the three linked protagonists of their own lives, meshed with the counter-assessments by those characters around each of them. The series doesn't wrap up in a terribly satisfying way, but then life doesn't either.
A colleague of mine, a machinist turned political philosopher, says that he re-reads Plato's "Republic" every five years, and each time it's a different book. Not a letter has changed, but he has. Thus it is with important literature.
Exactly why these books are great. Dunstan and Liesl are two of my favorite character studies in literature, ever. Also, for so many characters to be archetypes in a book that introduces and explores the concept of archetypes only halfway through the middle book is a stroke of genius, IMO.
So true. This is why Davies, Kundera, and Durant (among a few others) keep getting reread at intervals. We can only see what we are ready to see, and only understand what we are ready to understand at any given moment. If we take in something at too early a moment, we are likely missing a large portion of it just through circumstance.