• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Decent USB Interfaces and Software Recommendations?

I use Universal Audio, which is probably more than you want to spend. I haven’t read all the posts yet, but the one interface you should be looking at is AUDIENT. Those sound really good - clearly better than the standard fare.

Idk brother, have an audio engineer friend who went full Audient and wishes he had gone UA instead. Their hardware and software play so nicely with MacOS I feel like UAD and Waves Plugins along with an Apollo Twin are on everybody's desks these days.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gizmot
I've been using a Motu M2. Works for me...has useful features.
They also make an M4.

Link Removed
Link Removed
I own a MOTU interface and I'm struggling with the drivers and many other people in their Facebook user group do as well. I wouldn't recommend it.

OP Maybe you can find a RME AI that fits your budget. RME is know as one of the companies with the best drivers support in the business.
 
This is an important bit: You want to monitor your live bass playing before it goes into (and back out of) your DAW, becasue otherwise you get latency (sounds like slapback delay), and it's hard to play things in time with already recorded tracks.

with a reasonably good setup, software monitoring works okay and it's been so... uhm, for a decade, I think.

for instance, I'm using a Thunderbolt audio interface and my round-trip latency, including the plugins, is much less than a single Shure wireless.

in fact, I never used hardware monitoring in last 10 years, software monitoring works good enough for me.
 
Idk brother, have an audio engineer friend who went full Audient and wishes he had gone UA instead. Their hardware and software play so nicely with MacOS I feel like UAD and Waves Plugins along with an Apollo Twin are on everybody's desks these days.

Yeah - there's no doubt that UA has got their act together and everything works well. When I read the OP, I thought the author wanted something that sounded really good and didn't cost a lot and I believe that Audient fits the bill for that. If someone has problems, it's probably because of software and DAW issues, not necessarily because of the interface.
 
Yeah - there's no doubt that UA has got their act together and everything works well. When I read the OP, I thought the author wanted something that sounded really good and didn't cost a lot and I believe that Audient fits the bill for that. If someone has problems, it's probably because of software and DAW issues, not necessarily because of the interface.

I completely understand where you're coming from as far as Audient making some pretty decent audio interfaces. But due to the fact that a producer I know has a full all-out Audient setup and constantly goes on about wishing he had just gone UAD in the first place is probably biasing me, but just saying maybe he wants the best of the best even if its expensive if its a serious investment that you're pretty much never gonna upgrade then I think its worth the money to have a quad-core tube-preamp powerhouse as the central focal point of your A/D conversion... the DSP technology, preamps and converters are just so unreal....
 
I think its worth the money to have a quad-core tube-preamp powerhouse as the central focal point of your A/D conversion... the DSP technology, preamps and converters are just so unreal....

well, there're no tube preamps in Apollo, please don't spread misinformation. there's just a digital emulation of them, but not the actual tubes.

if you got to spend $2k on an audio interface, it should sound very good. in fact, they all do in this price range, not only the Apollo. but it's the wrong post to debate, which of them is better, as OP wanted something under $400.
 
Last edited:
I have a very basic studio setup, started with a Tascam US-122. I upgraded to a Scarlett 2i and then again to a Tascam US16x08 to have 16 tracks. I use Cakewalk as a DAW and have been very pleased with it. The Scarlett is a decent unit with quality basic features. The Tascam 16x08 is not bad and works fine for the recording I do. there are all kinds of products out there, support for WIN 11 may be something to look at.

I recommend Cakewalk because it is a full featured product (originally Sonar) for Windows, and has many free plugins with the basic install. The learning curve is not bad and it is totally free, it also has an online module where you can share your recordings either privately or publicly. The online mixer interface is pretty basic, but it's there and you can import your projects from the full DAW. There are quite a few YouTube tutorials out there with new videos arriving all the time as the product becomes more popular. Check out Creative Sauce on YouTube. You might want to look at what DAW drivers are supported on WIN 11. Lots of DAW options out there. I went from Audacity, to Cubase, to Cakewalk and haven't looked back.

One note to be aware of, plugin's need a fair amount of memory (32GB is recommended for multi tracking with plugins). Wasn't sure how familiar you were with DAW software and how "fat" the WIN11 OS is...

** For multiple headphones, you can always add a headphone amp - the Behringer HA-400 is $29.00 and supports four sets of headphone with individual volume controls.

Good luck and enjoy!
 
Last edited:
+1 for the Audient - Almost ANY Audient. I have a channel two issue with my EVO, but I wanted an all in one solution (not having to mic a guitar amp and not using computer DSP for amp/cam sims) for recording bass and guitar and everything else so I picked up an Audient SONO which has a basic tube pre-amp INSIDE it and uses TWO NOTES cab sims (included) and has a dedicated re-amp out which was a requirement for me as I wanted to use some of the pedals I have for mixing purposes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gizmot
I have not posted on TB for months. I really haven't had much to say based on the increased number of trite discussions and posts I see lately. However, I have a soft spot in my heart for the recording forum.

I will chime in here with something I have said before. When choosing equipment and budgeting, people rarely take a holistic approach. What does that mean? It means looking at the whole picture and examining the whole system, not the individual parts.

What is the best XXX for the money? Wow, if I choose to spend XXX more I can get the upgraded unit and that is better, right? You always want the best. I call foul.

To sum this up, "When you put lipstick on a pig... It is still a pig". Think about your whole system, starting with your "Studio". If your studio is an office, bedroom, corner of basement then you will are only going to approach a certain level of quality regardless of how much you spend. "Hey, get that Neumann mic, it is great!". Wrong. If you are recording in an untreated room, all you are going to do is capture all the crap in your room and the poor sound treatment. Buy the best interface with the best A/D converters, it will sound great!" Wrong for the same reasons.

You need to match the lipstick with the pig. Look at your weakest link whether that is your space or your talent and adjust accordingly. If you are recording in an untreated space then I see little reason to spend more than $200 for an interface and $200 on a mic, etc. A very good whole working sound recording system should cost a person less than $1,000 in total for a typical home recording set up. And guess what? It can sound pretty damn good! You don't need the best mics or best interfaces or best A/D. They will be lost on you and a waste of your money. Who cares what your A/D converter noise floor is when your ambient noise is huge? Ditto the sensitivity and eq curve of your mic. There are plenty of <$300 mics that are fine (unless you are a star singer in an isolation booth). Latency issues? You will solve more of those with a good computer with memory and CPU than by the interface. I haven't had serious latency issues since the system I had running on a Pentium and XP. I simply don't have latency issues.

You want better than a $1,000 dollar studio? Then you need to upgrade the pig, not the makeup. You need to upgrade your space - work on sound treatments and space design. Then get better lipstick for your enhanced pig. At the same time you also need to work on improving your musical skills and recording, editing and mixing skills. I consider those to be part of the pig as well.

My pig has pretty nice lipstick and sounds ok. I have upgraded as time and my talent permits. Most of my gains in quality have not come from my gear or space, rather than from my improved recording and mixing skills as I have learned how to use what I've got. I use a Scarlett 18i20 (upgraded from a 2i4 last year) and Pro Tools (which I spent my Covid isolation time learning how to use).