TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Thanks. I have an active EQ preamp in my bass, so you recommend active or passive DI?It really depends who is mixing FOH. If they work for your band you may have success with a sound you make via your helix. They still likely want a dry DI as well.
If you don’t know them and they work for a club or are mixing a festival they will definitely strongly prefer a dry DI. If you talk to them and they have the inputs they might try your wet signal. If it was me mixing I’d try your helix line and use it if it worked in the mix without too much struggle. I actually usually mic’d bass amps esp if the player uses fx as part of their sound.
Except that’s a wet out sound without a dry pre-helix soundYou don't need a DI since the Helix has a mono XLR output and performs full amp modeling. The Helix is your entire sound. This is assuming you don't use an amp on stage and only bring your Helix. If you use an amp on stage, you can send either the Helix XLR out, amp XLR out, or both if they want options.
Except that’s a wet out sound without a dry pre-helix sound
My signal chain is:As a sound guy.. I generally accept whatever DI feed I get from the guitars "gods" on stage.
For bass (had a discussion on this w/ my guitar player after last nights gig) about what stomp pedals he had vs a former bassist he worked used to have!
I will take a DI feed from pedalboard or amp and only use a separate DI if the tone is.... well sux!
For typical bass use - unless the music is highly stylized, the pro's I work with have bare bones bass feeds. No delays, reverbs, occasionally some grit/grunge.. but not much more.
For example, I have Cali 76 comp, chorus pedal and Khan DI. House sound guy last 3 nights (Midas M32 board) was over the moon about the Khan feed.
I don't even bring an amp. I'm 100% IEM so no need.
If you handed me an XLR from your Helix.. I'm good with that!My signal chain is:
Compression > Darkglass B7K ultra sim > ampeg SVT IR > compression
No fancy delay or reverb. I would love this all in pedal form but the helix keeps it simple and affordable.
Thanks for the vote of confidence!My signal chain is:
Compression > Darkglass B7K ultra sim > ampeg SVT IR > compression
No fancy delay or reverb. I would love this all in pedal form but the helix keeps it simple and affordable.
Agreed, the Helix is an all in one solution provided you program it appropriately. Adding a dry DI signal compounds other problems that can create much more serious issues when combined with the processed signal because of the latency present in the digital processing.If you handed me an XLR from your Helix.. I'm good with that!![]()
The Helix dry and wet sends should be latency compensated to work together.If no amp on stage... you can split and send a dry and a wet from the Helix no ?
As for adding a DI... Active bass, passive DI and the inverse. If you do small community, county fair festival type gigs it isn't a bad idea to have a good DI in your kit. Sound companies come in varying degress of sophistication out in the sticks... Being able to slap a JDI or J48 down just might be the ticket...
exactly: you can use the helix with a DI with one of the built in outputs and the wet signal going out from another one (plenty of tutorial on youtube to program the helix this way, if you do so: no problem with latency issues), if you have the wet signal from the helix and a DI box pre helix in your chain it could be you'll have latency issues, so no, you shouldn't waste money in an external DI box, you can do everything with what you have nowCombining “outside the box” (no latency) with inside the box” (latency) will be an issue.
The Helix dry and wet sends should be latency compensated to work together.
Combining “outside the box” (no latency) with inside the box” (latency) will be an issue.