Mixed speakers and RH head and nobody is losing their mind yet? TB, who are you.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Haha I also am referring to the fact that the TC RH is probably the most divisive amp in TB history. There are threads full of posters cursing TC and swearing off all their products for all of perpetuity because of the inflated power ratings. I just thought combine RH + mixed speakers and people would lose their mind. The TB of 2015 would. Y’all gone soft.LOL...yeah like @honeyiscool says, "Where's the don't mix cabs group?"
Ok, I'll start it - The old 410 on top 115 on the bottom is less than an ideal match in many, but not ALL cases. Story goes that there can be significant sonic cancellation from different dispersion patterns and slightly different phase between the 10" speakers and the 15" speakers. It used to be the 15" speakers had the best low end. Now days, the 10" speakers can often give you lower and tighter bottom end. So the 115 shouldn't be an automatic, "I need that for the low end". It just doesn't hold water any longer.
Now, having said that, the old 410+115 combination can sound really good. I used to use an acoustic B410 and a GK115bpx that sounded great together. That may just be lucky though because they weren't specifically designed to be used together. Nonetheless, I gigged with that set-up for years and it worked quite well, especially after I got my Eden WT500/800 where I could hook each cab up to its own power channel and use the balance knob to balance out the sound between the two cabs. The GK115bpx is an extremely boomy cab and the acoustic B410, not so much.
You are much more likely to have good results with different cabs from the same manufacturer than you are by piecing them together like I did. I use an acoustic 410 on top of an acoustic 115 at our rehearsal space powered by an Eden WT600 amp and it sounds good. Not as good as my Eden WT500/800 into my DNS-410 cab, but still plenty good enough sound to gig with.
Most of the major manufacturers design their cabs to work together. One of the best "multiple cab combinations" I've heard was an Eden D212XLT with an Eden D210XST on the top - very complimentary sound from that combination. If you have questions about compatibility of speakers from specific manufacturers, don't be afraid to contact them and ask. If you have any questions about Mesa cabs compatibility, just ask @agedhorse here on TB. He designed the Mesa amps and cabs and is very upfront about what works best within his product line.
The nice thing about not mixing cabs with different speaker sizes is that 10" speakers with 10" speakers always sound good. 12" with 12" always sound good. There is no phase cancellation problems or any dispersion cancellation problems. It's possible to get a little bit I suppose when mixing cabs from different brands because the speakers aren't exactly the same, but the problems are minimal. So there's no question whether a 410+ 410 or a 210+410 will sound good.
So, that should satisfy, or at perhaps start that discussion about mixing cabs for this thread.
View attachment 3524558
Honestly I feel like 12s are where it’s at. They’re physically quite ideal. One of them can often outperform a 210, two of them can keep up with a 410 and can be sort of a mini fridge, and they are not as big as 15s and can have much smaller cabinets. They’re really a great physical middle ground where size, weight, and power meet.Building on @Rip Van Dan's post I want to back up and ask O.P.: Why is it that you think of a 1x15 plus 4x10 as a "dream rig"? The usual answer to that question is the belief that you need the 15 for lows and the 10s for mids and highs, so the combination is ideal. This simply is not true of modern bass cabs: You can find just as many deep-sounding 2x10s and 4x10s and bright-sounding 1x15s as the other way around. I don't know anything about the cabs he's looking at -- they might be great as far as I know -- but I wouldn't recommend choosing a cab just because it seems to come closest to the 115+410 "dream rig." Instead, I would just look for cabs that you like the sound of -- whether they include 10s or 12s or 15s or something elsee -- and buy two of them if you need that much rig.
For me 10s are "where it's at" -- because a pair of vertically stacked 2x10s is ideal for my purposes. Four 10s gives me more than enough volume for my needs, but the ability to arrange them into a tall 4x10 array has lots of other advantages. A pair of 12s would probably be enough for my volume needs, but I love having some speakers up closer to my ears without needing a stand of some sort. On the other hand, a pair of 2x12's would be way more sound (and added weight and size) than I need.Honestly I feel like 12s are where it’s at. They’re physically quite ideal. One of them can often outperform a 210, two of them can keep up with a 410 and can be sort of a mini fridge, and they are not as big as 15s and can have much smaller cabinets. They’re really a great physical middle ground where size, weight, and power meet.
Dr. Thumpenstein, thank you for the recommendation, I will consider it.
Bulldog, I dont have the option to try out the Cabs where I live. Otherwise I certainly would.