• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Double-ball flatwounds write-up

Jun 25, 2008
987
308
As of last week I've tried every flatwound set avaliable in double-ball-end* on my Hohner Jack bass. So I've decided to make write-up ranking of the most important differences observed.

The strings are:
LaBella s500M .049-.109
LaBella S500L .043-.104
Optima Chrome 4099 .045-.100
Status .045-.105

Tension - high to low:
LaBella S500M
LaBella S500L
Optima Chrome/Status - TIE

Brightness - high to low:
Status
Optima
LaBella's

Notes on string-to-string balance:
The Labella sets exibit gradually higher tension toward the higher pitched strings, as does the Status set. The Optima is the exception having very even string-to-string balance.
It's really a matter of preference what's best for you, the gradually higher tension toward the higher strings is common in many string sets and works well for a groove orineted style of playing. If you do wide arpeggios and scalar runs you might prefer a more even balance though.

Subjective tonal observations:
The LaBella's are the kings of punch and will get you closest to the Motown sound. Fingerstyle playing gets you a very deep and almost thuddy tone and when you dig in there's always some zing to be had. Watch your neck and fingers with the medium set!
Optimas are a different, they're lower tension with lively mids and treble is more snappy than zingy. You loose some punch compared to LaBella's but gain growl and it's easier to rely on variations in technique for getting different tones rather than turning knobs. Tone is very well-balanced which makes them the most versatile for me at least.
Status flats are the brightest with lots of clank and zing, possibly due to having tapered cores. The low strings don't push low frequencies as much as the other sets but could be compensated for via good EQ.

Before anyone mentions how flats are meant to be enjoyed after being played in for tens of years I'll say this: I've used LaBella flats exclusively for 3 years chaging sets once a year, because they just become tonally limited at a point and clank will be more prescent than actuall harmonics of the note. The only set I'd consider leaving on indefinitely is the LaBella mediums but your fingers and neck pay the price.

*If hours of googling has done me any good. Please tell me if I missed any.
 
Forgot about these fellows!
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]

Anyone out there using flats on their headless bases?
I'll give the Picatos above a try soon and report.

I'll say again for flats Optmas are the beez-knees. Here's a short clip I recorded a while back: [Invalid or Expired Link Removed]

Slight OT aside I'll try GHS pressurewound available in double-ball as well, just because I like any string that's mellow and the alloy52. Most double-ball sets available are stainless rounds only 2-3 brands have nickel or NPS sets.

:bassist:
 
Impressions of the Picato flats fresh out of pack: Overall tension comparable to Labella light set. Very warm sounding E and A. Half-round like pingy D & G. Every string is taper core. Maybe turns in to an awesome upright-like or "60's" sounding set after being played in, maybe not. I won't bother finding out as I like a livelier/brighter flats set. In fact I'll leave GHS pressurewounds on until Optima sends me some sample low E after new years. The pressurewounds have the grunt and growl of a round with signifficantly less abrassive feel and tone.
 
Gave the Picatos another whirl before ultimately replacing them with pressurewounds. I have to add the Picato flats sound less thuddy and clanky than broken in Labellas so they could be of appeal to those who go for an overall very warm sounding flat. Easily the warmest sounding of all above flats out-of-pack despite taper core construction.
 
Not particularly intending to revive this old thread but just adding a bit of information for anyone reading it. I have LaBella S500L strings on my Washburn Status. I recently ordered some Labella Deep Talkin' Bass 760FL short scale strings for my Squier Bronco and thought from the gauge and materials that they might be the same strings, so I emailed LaBella to check. They confirmed that they are the same. Their response is below:

Thanks for your email. Yes, they're the same string just with double ball-ends. Please let us know if we can be of further assistance and thanks for playing La Bella!

Regards,
La Bella Strings
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: mikewalker
Sorry to wake an old thread, but I have a question that I can't seem to find an answer to anywhere.
I'm looking at possibly buying a used Steinberger style fretless bass, and usually I play light gauge roundwound strings (.40" to .95"). I know that it's better to use flatwound strings on a fretless bass, but I can't find any double ball flatwound strings in that gauge listed anywhere. Do they exist?
This will be my first headless bass, and also my first fretless bass.
Am I asking too much?

. o O (Are the lightest gauge, double ball end, flatwound bass strings really .43" to .104"?)
 
Last edited:
I'm looking at possibly buying a used Steinberger style fretless bass, and usually I play light gauge roundwound strings (.40" to .95"). I know that it's better to use flatwound strings on a fretless bass, but I can't find any double ball flatwound strings in that gauge listed anywhere. Do they exist?

I don't play a headless or a fretless, but I've read about a special adapter you can get for the headless that allows you to use regular strings. Have you looked into that?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4848277