• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Drum machine like Alesis SR-16 but with better interface?

I was playing around with an online Roland 909 the other day (check it out at HTML-909) and started to wonder... Does anyone know of a good drum machine that has better samples than this but a nice interface like this? I'm coming from an Alesis SR-16 and it's good for what I use it for, however I'd really like something with an interface like this where I can just have the bar laid out in front of me and click on the specific subdivisions. Ideally, it would then be possible to record over this without quantization to get a real sounding drum track (for example, do kick and snare with sequencer, then record hi-hat hits with a trigger). With the SR-16, I have to slow down the beat to be really slow and then tap in the drum hits, which is fairly time consuming. Being able to switch on and off the quantization to get a realistic sound is important, which the Roland 909 doesn't seem to do. Also, the samples on the 909 aren't very good. Does anything like this exist, or should I just stick with my SR-16?
 
SR-16 is still around because of how useful they are. There are newer ones, but few are significantly "better" IMO.

This is due partly to how much you can do on computer now.

If I'm reading you correctly, it sounds like you need a DAW with a sequencer. Are you wanting to trigger live instruments via MIDI, or software instruments? And by bar, do you mean piano roll? A DAW with a sequencer can both trigger and record at the same time. It can also export midi data with samples to a WAV file, so you don't have to "play" the samples and then record. But you could if you want to, by recording to a separate audio track in the DAW, either triggered via MIDI, or played live. MIDI data in a sequencer is just your computer "playing" data, like a player-piano. The sequencer triggers whatever you assign it to triggers - samples or a midi-capable instrument like a keyboard/synthesizer.

All a drum machine does is trigger samples in the machine, or export midi data so it can trigger other instruments, like drums or keyboard samples, or be controlled by another sequencer (like from the PC). Drum machines are really great, but are becoming obsolete, since all of this and then some can be done via a PC or tablet.

In a DAW you just need some type of controller to enter midi notes, and then samples to be triggered by the notes. You can use a mouse to enter notes, or a USB controller/keyboard.

EDIT: I just remembered something. The 909 is even older than the SR16.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: basslust
Thanks. What I meant by laying out the bar in front of me is basically giving me sixteen spaces on which to base a rhythm like in the sequencer I mentioned. I want to be able to start with the guts of a drum beat, say the bass drum and main snare hits, using a sequencer, then record the hi-hats, etc, in real-time. The SR-16 can create the exact output that I want in terms of mixing quantized and non-quantized drum hits to make realistic sounding drums, but it is missing the sequencer interface that makes it much easier to set up the bulk of the rhythm. I'm not too familiar with MIDI, but is this something that would be pretty easy to do with MIDI pads and Pro Tools? What would be a recommendation for a MIDI controller that could do this?
 
Thanks. What I meant by laying out the bar in front of me is basically giving me sixteen spaces on which to base a rhythm like in the sequencer I mentioned. I want to be able to start with the guts of a drum beat, say the bass drum and main snare hits, using a sequencer, then record the hi-hats, etc, in real-time. The SR-16 can create the exact output that I want in terms of mixing quantized and non-quantized drum hits to make realistic sounding drums, but it is missing the sequencer interface that makes it much easier to set up the bulk of the rhythm. I'm not too familiar with MIDI, but is this something that would be pretty easy to do with MIDI pads and Pro Tools? What would be a recommendation for a MIDI controller that could do this?

I should probably apologize for this long post - I'm assuming that since you were using a drum machine emulator online, that you are interested in utilizing a computer to help with your drum tracks, perhaps in conjunction with a drum machine. If not, you can disregard most of my post.

First and foremost, you need a piano roll, which is a visual representation of a "keyboard" scroller for the 16 "channels" (now more) of MIDI data. Any typical modern software sequencer has a piano roll - you can use a controller or a mouse to assign MIDI "notes" to the piano roll, using a controller (even a mouse can work). And most DAW programs (Pro Tools, etc...) include a sequencer that integrates with a piano roll. The DAW then can use the MIDI data in the sequencer to play software instruments (that utilize samples) and synths. Drums can be virtual instruments, too. I use Reaper, which includes a piano roll and sequencer, and a virtual drum program (plug in) by Addictive Drums (a limited free version no longer available, I believe). I don't use a controller because I really don't need one. I just use a mouse to point/click, drag/drop, etc...

If I understand you correctly, this is how I would do it. I would set up a basic rhythm track in pro-tools, by assigning MIDI notes to the scroll for however long you want the song to me time/measure wise - kick, snare, hi-hat, ride and/or crash (MIDI is non-destructive, so you can always take away or add later. A MIDI track is not a sound file). Set up the live drums to record to audio tracks in the DAW, hit record, and play. The DAW will run the sequencer, which plays the MIDI drums tracks (remember, MIDI is not a sound file), and records you playing along with it. Easy peasy.

You do not need your SR16, or any other separate drum machine to do this.

MIDI was invented long before DLE (digital linear editing) was available. It was, in essence, previously how computers were used in music production before DLE. Computers were not used to record and edit, but to "play" music. MIDI is the data computers used to play music. MIDI is not sound. It is note off and on commands. Brilliant in its invention. But kinda primitive in its implementation. MIDI is actually straight forward, but it is non-intuitive for modern computing as it pre-dates the graphical user interface (GUI) and DLE modes of production.

DAWs are now "in-the-box" virtual production environments. Playing, assigning, sequencing, recording, mixing, and editing can all occur within the DAW. No separate instruments are even needed, apart from any non-virtual instruments you may want to record. Depending on computing power and software limitations, you can theoretically do it all simultaneously.

MIDI is just on and off commands for each channel of data (16 in general MIDI). A MIDI controller does not play music. You just use it to assign MIDI data. It's the sequencer that plays music by send data and "playing" a MIDI-capable instrument. Some controllers can be used in real time, but I've never done it.

The SR16 is a midi-capable machine. It has a built-in sequencer, and a limited amount of samples in the form of drum sounds. Since it's MIDI-capable, you can use it to SYNC with other MIDI instruments, to control, or be controlled. For example, theoretically you can save a pattern on SR16, hook it up to a computer via MIDI connection, and it can "play" drum sound samples stored on the computer. Conversely, you can use a sequencer on the computer to play the drum sounds stored on the SR16. A MIDI keyboard with onboard synth sounds works the same way. Most modern MIDI keyboard controllers are not synthesizers, however. They can control and/or play software synths in the DAW, but make no sound on their own.

But again, since DAWs include sequencers and virtual instruments, you do not need it to do what you want to do.

As computers and DAWs became more powerful, the need for separate, dedicated drum machines has dwindled. There are only few left on the market. And they are, IMO, not light years better than the SR16, because they are neither computers nor DAWs, if that makes sense.