TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
This is what you said: "playing with a pick does really sound very differently than playing with your fingers, a more punchy tone with more emphasis on the attack of the notes,".You are the one making no sense, this is not even what we are discussing in this thread and it seems like you are settled to misunderstand what I say on purpose.
This is what you said: "playing with a pick does really sound very differently than playing with your fingers, a more punchy tone with more emphasis on the attack of the notes,".
I completely disagree and gave an example. You then backpedaled and started getting into specific finger styles.
I'm trying to break this down as simply as I can. You made a blanket statement to which I disagreed with and gave an example. You then effectively changed your story and made it less of a blanket statement (you specified). A technique commonly referred to as "moving the goal post".So I am not allowed to specify?
It matters what specific technique you use, finger style is not just finger style, and what technique you use does have an impact on the tone, however you can never sound exactly like using a pick using your fingers and all this relates to the topic of this specific thread where I assume OP is using traditional finger picking style.
Also please read the updated comment of mine you quote.
I'm trying to break this down as simply as I can. You made a blanket statement to which I disagreed with and gave an example. You then effectively changed your story and made it less of a blanket statement (you specified). A technique commonly referred to as "moving the goal post".
Oi vey! You made a blanket statement about pick playing that had nothing to do with the OP's style of finger playing. Again: "playing with a pick does really sound very differently than playing with your fingers, a more punchy tone with more emphasis on the attack of the notes". I disagreed. THEN you got specific. There are MANY different finger style techniques just as there are many different pick techniques. I totally agree that finger playing won't sound the same as pick playing and visa-versa but I absolutely disagree with your general statement that pick playing is punchier or more attack emphasized.What story, this is not a competition of who has the best story, it's a dynamic discussion.
And I didn't changed my "story", I specified.
My original comment was me assuming the OP used traditional finger picking style.
Then you came with examples of untraditional finger picking styles that sounds more like using a pick.
Which got me to specify including those alternative untraditional styles in my argument, while my conclusion remained the same:
No matter how you use your fingers it will never sound exactly like using a pick.
Should I rather have ignored your angle on the argument in my reply to you and have stated exactly the same once more?
Oi vey! You made a blanket statement about pick playing that had nothing to do with the OP's style of finger playing. Again: "playing with a pick does really sound very differently than playing with your fingers, a more punchy tone with more emphasis on the attack of the notes". I disagreed. THEN you got specific. There are MANY different finger style techniques just as there are many different pick techniques. I totally agree that finger playing won't sound the same as pick playing and visa-versa but I absolutely disagree with your general statement that pick playing is punchier or more attack emphasized.
I don't feel you are attacking me at all. You made a generalization that I disagreed with and you are have a very hard time coming to grips with that.I give up.
You win!
Happy?
This is hopeless.
I am trying to have a genuine discussion here, and you are more interested in making conspiracy theories of how I am attacking you and avoiding your input, which couldn't be farther from the truth.
I don't feel you are attacking me at all. You made a generalization that I disagreed with an you are have a very hard time coming to grips with that.
More like my table? As if I or anyone was clairvoyant enough to know about your assumption, Lol. How does one not get specific to a generalization? ANY example would be specific due to the very nature of a non-specific generalization.You are the one who got specific, which I replied on, changing my original angle a bit to accommodate your alternative angle on the story, while sticking to my main point that finger playing will never sound exactly like a pick.
As I already explained my original post was me assuming OP used traditional finger style, related to the actual topic of the thread.
Something we disagree on I understand, but no reason to call me out as someone who are just being contrary for the sake of it, which seems more like your table, honestly.
More like my table? As if I or anyone was clairvoyant enough to know about your assumption, Lol. How does one not get specific to a generalization? ANY example would be specific due to the very nature of a non-specific generalization.![]()
For 50+ years I have exclusively used a pick and cant play with my fingers, but I wouldnt let a drummer tell me how to play my own bass guitar. If you are happy with fingers show him your middle one and continue playing the way you play the best..with your fingers!So our drummer keeps pushing me to use a pick. Implying I'll be better if I use a pick. I keep telling him it has nothing to do with skill level and I always preferred using fingers... His reasoning is when he plays bass he uses a pick and he "sounds better than me" so For 50+ yearsI should use a pick.... Any way I can dumb it down for him?
This could open up a whole new can of worm in regards to what "traditional or un-traditional finger style" even is. There are a lot of players like Geddy or Steve Harris who have a lot of attack and punch (I can't think of a pick player who has more) who would possibly be considered more "traditional" than Entwistle.I mentioned what my assumption was several times in my replies to you, something you blatantly chose to ignore in your answers, I assume to get your point through.
Also is it so strange to assume one use traditional finger picking style, as I would claim 90% of all finger players use, you know relating to the actual topic of the thread, and not the alternative more exotic untradional techniques that you used as an argument.