• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

EMG Active P/J Sets

Unless I've forgotten how to google, there's remarkably few YouTube videos out there demoing or comparing EMG's bass pickups, specifically the P and PJ sets. I'm looking into a P/J set and I've read into the differences between the PJX, PJAX, and PJCSX - I understand the physical differences (ceramic, alnico, ceramic under steel, and the X vs non-X preamp) between all of them, and I understand on paper what those differences mean, but "on paper" doesn't always translate to reality very well.

I'm looking for something with strong lows and low-mids, but with clarity ("muddy" is a four letter word as far as I'm concerned). One of the main reasons I prefer a P or PJ setup over a Jazz setup is that most Jazz pickups are lacking in bottom end for me and don't have as much punch as I would like. I follow the "it's better to cut than boost" approach so as a general rule I'd rather have to roll back any boomy lows or cutting highs that might be present rather than having to boost the signal up to make up for a lack of them. I play exclusively flatwounds, if that makes a difference.

Having said that, my guess is that the PJAX set would be my best choice, but I would definitely appreciate any input you all could offer.
 
I've tried them all and I prefer the regular PJ set. None of the X-series do it for me. Extended highs and lows are not an improvement over the normal EMG tone IMO. The alnico pickups do have more mids but are somewhat muted in the highs. I found I could back off the tone control of the regular PJ set and get similar results. The CS were also more polite, not my thing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 59jazz and gamb