• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join free Log in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

EQ bypass vs. flat EQ

Nadja

Nadja

Jun 6, 2010
6
0
Barcelona
www.myspace.com
#1
My Markbass head (TA-503) runs perfectly for me with flat EQ. There is an optional footswitch that controls the mute function and allows to bypass the EQ section (both the 4-band EQ and the VLE and VLE filters). I'm wondering if there is any audible difference between having the EQ flat and the filters at zero on one side, and bypassing the the EQ/filters section on the other. The footswitch is expensive and I woudn't buy it only for the muting.

Has someone compared both situations, maybe in another amp, or knows what to expect?
 
#4
Thanks for the answers.

I see, the idea is to be able to switch between a flat setting and a filter/EQ configuration. I was thinking that since pedals without true bypass can degrade a bit the signal, maybe there was some benefit in bypassing the EQ section. Also, I had in mind that the Momark modular Markbass system allows for a dummy no-EQ module so there could be some interest in having the preamp going straight to the power amp.
 
#5
Nadja said:
Thanks for the answers.

I see, the idea is to be able to switch between a flat setting and a filter/EQ configuration. I was thinking that since pedals without true bypass can degrade a bit the signal, maybe there was some benefit in bypassing the EQ section. Also, I had in mind that the Momark modular Markbass system allows for a dummy no-EQ module so there could be some interest in having the preamp going straight to the power amp.
Click to expand...
this is a big problem with gear talk on the internet...things that don't matter get blown up into things that people think really do matter.
 
#7
naturalkinds said:
Neat that that MB head apparently has an EQ bypass. The only amp I've been acquainted with that has that feature are the Glockenklang heads.
Click to expand...

My Carvin BX1200 (as I do believe all the BX series do) has an EQ bypass. Nothing really new about it.

As to the OP, bypassing should = flat. It's been my experience that they are the same. I've never had an EQ set flat that when engaged sounded any different than when bypassed. That is the purpose of bypassing...to not have any frequencies boosted or cut when not in use.
 
#11
naturalkinds said:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't it only the GRAPHIC EQ on that amplifier that can be bypassed? I just had a look at the specifications on that amp, and it doesn't appear that you can get a signal chain going straight from the preamp to the poweramp on that head.
Click to expand...

Yes, only the Graphic EQ. I thought that was the point.

If one wants truly flat, then only use a signal boost into a power amp. Any preamp will color the tone. Of course, then you have the whole speaker cab messing up the flat signal after the fact.
 
#12
Sundogue said:
If one wants truly flat, then only use a signal boost into a power amp. Any preamp will color the tone. Of course, then you have the whole speaker cab messing up the flat signal after the fact.
Click to expand...

Sure a preamp will colour the tone. There's a big difference between the colour a UA preamp feeds into the signal chain and the colour an Avalon preamp imparts. And let's not stop at the speaker cab. What about the acoustic environment? That colours the sound exiting the speaker enclosure, too!

Look. No one disputes that a preamp colours the tone. That this is so is not at all relevant to the question of whether an EQ module whose role is to boost or cut certain frequency groups can be defeated in a signal chain. Which is what I was commenting on in my initial post here.
 
#17
A strange place to express discourse nihilism about technological esoterica is on a thread devoted to it.

Yeah, yeah, yeah. The only thing that matters is the musician, and the sound comes from your fingers, and the Little Mark II sounds a lot like an SVT.

Subtleties disappear in a mix or a real world, but it's frustrating to hear members disparage those interested in these finer differences on account of the fact that subtleties disappear in a band setting. Some of us, you know, are interested in design features of amplifiers, like EQs that can be disengaged from an integrated systems. And a forum on amplifiers thread seems like a very rational place to discuss it.

But yeah, yeah, yeah. If I'm worried so much about sound, I should probably go start practicing, or... [insert your overly-espoused TB truism here].
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spruce Knob
#19
naturalkinds said:
A strange place to express discourse nihilism about technological esoterica is on a thread devoted to it.

Yeah, yeah, yeah. The only thing that matters is the musician, and the sound comes from your fingers, and the Little Mark II sounds a lot like an SVT.

Subtleties disappear in a mix or a real world, but it's frustrating to hear members disparage those interested in these finer differences on account of the fact that subtleties disappear in a band setting. Some of us, you know, are interested in design features of amplifiers, like EQs that can be disengaged from an integrated systems. And a forum on amplifiers thread seems like a very rational place to discuss it.

But yeah, yeah, yeah. If I'm worried so much about sound, I should probably go start practicing, or... [insert your overly-espoused TB truism here].
Click to expand...

+1 :D
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom
Back