• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Experience: My Transition Through Several PJ Basses

This is my first post on TalkBass, and I felt compelled to write it because so many threads here have helped me

I have been playing bass for almost 30 years, always as an amateur—heavy metal band in my teens, and later a stable rehearsal/jam band just for fun. My musical “home base” is classic rock and heavy metal, though over time I added some funk and a bit of jazz/pop. But at my core, I'm a Rock/Heavy Metal player.

I started out with a very inexpensive Faim bass from Argentina made of guatambú (Balfourodendron riedelianum)—extremely heavy. After that came my first real PJ: a 1999 Ibanez SR300DX made in Korea, which I sold this year (SR300DX). Over the years I added a Music Man StingRay 5 HH (US made, 2013), then a Fender American Standard Jazz Bass (US made, 2012).

When it came time to fill the PJ void, I wanted a real quality upgrade, with one non-negotiable (At least, that was my preliminar thought): a 38 mm nut. I fell in love with the Jazz Bass neck very late in my life, unfortunately. After a lot of reading, I bought a Lakland Skyline 44-64 GZ B-Stock, fully aware of the mixed opinions on that model. But after a few months of use—and digging deeper into the specific unit I received—it just did not convince me. I returned it and bought another B-Stock, but this time a Sandberg VT4, after seriously considering a Japanese Fender Hybrid II (2024) with a possible pickup swap to EMG GZ.


What I Learned Along the Way

1. My old Ibanez SR300DX was better than I ever gave it credit for


The quality of the 1999 Korean SR300DX PJ was much higher than I assumed. After trying new Ibanez and even some higher-priced brands, I realized:

  • It had a surprisingly stable 2-piece neck with a quarter-sawn-style cut.
  • The active DX pickups interact extremely well with modern amp sims.
  • Overall construction quality was very respectable for its era and price.
2. Lakland Skyline 44-64 GZ (2023, black)

I had read repeatedly about its heavy weight, usually reported between 4.7–5.0 kg. Even the German distributor listed 4.6–4.7 kg.

Mine weighed 5.05 kg exactly. Even for home-studio use—and despite being used to heavy basses—it was simply too much from balance perspective and manipulation.

Other issues:

  • String height at the 12th fret on the E string could not go below 2.8 mm.
  • The truss rod sounded loose, and tapping the neck produced an unpleasant resonant overtone (this I think it was a manufacturing issue)
  • I knew the neck was plain-sawn, but I was surprised by how “outer-ring” the grain looked—not necessarily bad visually, but paired with the truss rod issue, it raised concerns.
  • I tried to find out what exact wood species was used for the neck—this info is not available anywhere.
  • Lakland states that Skylines are “inspected and finalized in Chicago,” but the ones sold in Europe are done in Germany. So that labeling felt misleading.
The good part:

The EMG GZ pickups + ebony board + heavy ash body combination is great. Bright, aggressive, punchy—excellent for what I wanted tone-wise.

But between the weight, QC inconsistencies, and the confusing branding/outsourcing situation, I felt the instrument should cost significantly less (at least 30% of the B stock, 50-60% of a new)...moreover considering all the SIRE models like P8 or P10DX from the same origin in the market (it was also a brand that I considered together with Sadowsky MetroExpress)

3. Sandberg VT4 California II

After lots of back-and-forth, I finally gave up the 38 mm nut and accepted Sandberg’s 39.5 mm (which I had already tested on other units). Also, B-Stock, ebony fretboard, but with a visibly more uniform/black appearance despite they have type of wood (which means not the same specie).

What stood out immediately:

  • Transparent wood-spec info, including a proper quarter-sawn neck.
  • Despite being solid ash as well, it weighed 4.2 kg—almost 1 kg lighter than the Lakland.
  • The active/passive versatility is excellent.
  • Overall playability and build quality are simply outstanding (String height at the 12th fret on the E string 2.1 mm, nice balance and ergonomy).
Maybe the Delano pickups do not have the same raw output as the EMG GZ, but that is easily compensated for with gain staging.


Final Thoughts

I hope this little journey—from the Ibanez to the Sandberg—helps someone else who is looking for their next PJ. Every instrument taught me something, and in the end, I found the one that really matches what I was looking for.
 
Sandbergs are wonderful basses. I’m glad you found what works for you .
Have you ever tried a Yamaha BB ? They make great PJ models. Especially the vintage 80’s BB3000 and BB2000.

Fender Duff McKagen models seems to get good reviews as well.

My favorite all time PJ are the original Yamaha BB models and the short lived EBMM Caprice. The output was a little low but the tone and playability and build quality rival boutique.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gino t
Sandbergs are wonderful basses. I’m glad you found what works for you .
Have you ever tried a Yamaha BB ? They make great PJ models. Especially the vintage 80’s BB3000 and BB2000.

Fender Duff McKagen models seems to get good reviews as well.

My favorite all time PJ are the original Yamaha BB models and the short lived EBMM Caprice. The output was a little low but the tone and playability and build quality rival boutique.
During my search I tried several options, obviously including Fender PJ models such as the Duff Custom, the Charvel San Dimas, as well as the classic Yamaha BB434 and BB734 (the newer Indonesia-made series). Out of all of these, the BB434 stood out for me, and I started looking for a Japan-made one. I think that if I hadn’t found the Sandberg B-stock in such great condition, I would have gone with either the BB434 or the Fender Hybrid II J -Japan 2024, both of which are very competitively priced and would have made it easy to swap in the EMG GZ pickups if I wanted. When I tried the Yamaha BB734 that was on display, I have to say the quality didn’t feel that great for the price (knobs, overall construction), but it could have just been that particular unit. I have also tested a Fender Aerodyne but it was in really bad condition and I didn’t like the neck ( even with 38 mm but, i didn’t like the curvature/radius and a how feels playing with fingers in right hand using my style). I didn’t find any BB3000 or 2000 closer to my home to test them but they have a great reputation and the consequently high price according my budget as well for a second hand unit. I have also realised that enjoy higher radius for the necks
 
  • Like
Reactions: LadyLoveStingRay5